Take note on the chassis. When I saw it on the turntable, I could never take a real good look at its hardware, but the little I saw, looked all feasable. Here it shows it better.
Vid
>>>For Sale? Clicky!<<<
-----The orginal Mr.Goodwrench on the JBO since 11/99-----
dam it , there should have been a large smokey burn out in that vid , LOL
car looks nice rolling down the road
That car looks mean coming down the road
Rest In Peace, Saint.
Truth > God
I was waiting for donuts or at least some WOT the whole time
Looks nice, nothing spectacular in my mind. But what is with Steven Kim about eating stuff??
dan
the more i see this the more i like it
make it run on E85 and im there dude
1989 Turbo Trans Am #82, 2007 Cobalt SS G85
damnit! i wanted more exhaust and maybe some tire smoke. i guess that'll have to do, though. it looks a lot better off the showroom floor
Andy
it's not how fast you go, it's how you get there that counts.
ZZP XP cam, 1.6 rockers, 105# springs, speedbuilt FWI, 3.3" modular pulley, TOG headers,
3" exhaust, flomatched injectors
'97 GTP 14.06@100.6mph pre cam w/ 3.5" pulley, I/E
Loooove it
~2014 New Z under the knife, same heart different body~
______________________
WHITECAVY no more
2012 numbers - 4SPD AUTOMATIC!!
328 HP
306 TQ
Inari wrote:I think it looks ugly
x2
There had been some good concept ideas floating around on the web for the last couple of years, as usual, GM picks the worst of them to actually build.
that interior is awful. it looks like it was taken out of a car from the 60s. if thats the interior it comes to showrooms with, i wouldnt drive it on a bet.
Round 1 Heat v Bulls 4-2 HEAT
Round 2 Heat v Nets 3-1 HEAT
SAC Forums
SmoothCavi (Brendan) wrote:... it looks like it was taken out of a car from the 60s. ...
uh... that's the point
Andy
it's not how fast you go, it's how you get there that counts.
ZZP XP cam, 1.6 rockers, 105# springs, speedbuilt FWI, 3.3" modular pulley, TOG headers,
3" exhaust, flomatched injectors
'97 GTP 14.06@100.6mph pre cam w/ 3.5" pulley, I/E
WORK wrote:SmoothCavi (Brendan) wrote:... it looks like it was taken out of a car from the 60s. ...
uh... that's the point
hahahahahahaha, no kidding.
"Formerly known as Jammit - JBO member since 1998" JBOM | CSS.net
That exterior looks just like that new Camaro........ what a coincedence.
SmoothCavi (Brendan) wrote:that interior is awful. it looks like it was taken out of a car from the 60s. if thats the interior it comes to showrooms with, i wouldnt drive it on a bet.
I don't think anyone buys a Camaro for the luxurious interior styling that they're known for.
^^^ Exactly, hell, if I had a chance of getting a car that has 400+ horsepower, I wouldn't care if it was a completely bare interior with just a milk crate screwed to the floor, I would still buy it. That and perhaps a nice foam cushion so my rear end doesn't get the checkered pattern indented on it.
AAAARGGHHH I get 1:06 into the video and it stops grrrrr.
Alex wrote:^^^ Exactly, hell, if I had a chance of getting a car that has 400+ horsepower, I wouldn't care if it was a completely bare interior with just a milk crate screwed to the floor, I would still buy it. That and perhaps a nice foam cushion so my rear end doesn't get the checkered pattern indented on it.
Pretty much what I always say.
I'd rather take a Blown big block Chevy, gutted and nothing more than the bare essentials to monitor and drive over an interior with real woods, carbon fiber, the finest leathers, and all that other BS.
SmoothCavi (Brendan) wrote:that interior is awful. it looks like it was taken out of a car from the 60s.
LMFAO!!!
I hate to see the look on you're face if you ever sit in a real musclecar.
why wont chevy go under already with things like that
Im out there Jerry and Im LOVIN EVERY MINUTE OF IT
yenkosuprcar wrote:SmoothCavi (Brendan) wrote:that interior is awful. it looks like it was taken out of a car from the 60s.
LMFAO!!!
I hate to see the look on you're face if you ever sit in a real musclecar.
*What the @!#$?!?! Bench seats?!?!?*
