does anyone know if there would be and major difference in a straight silcone connector from a hump style connector (charge pipes).......as far as any major distruptions in air flowing.....i have been planning the route for my piping and i am planning on using 2 hump style connectors to give me some movement when the engine is rocking....(yes i do have mount)..
When you say hump style, do you mean the "reducer" connectors, the ones that go from one size to another size (2 1/2" to 2" or vice versa)?
www.kronosperformance.com / 732-742-8837
NJHK (The JBO Negro) wrote:When you say hump style, do you mean the "reducer" connectors, the ones that go from one size to another size (2 1/2" to 2" or vice versa)?
What shifted said... the hump is for flexing when the engine shifts front to back from idle to WOT....
Thats all I needed to now, I didnt know if there was any major difference in the two besides the hump being for flexing.
Thanks guys.....
LOL nevermind what I just said then...I guess I'm the confussed one.
www.kronosperformance.com / 732-742-8837
if they werent so expensive, i woulda used 2 of them...its really the way to go. Any engineered OE system, or high end aftermarket system uses something to account for flex. I highly doubt that using a hump hose instead of a straight would affect anything at all power wise.
