GM S/C Exhaust - Boost Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 10:51 AM
Hey fellas Im doing the unthinkable. I'm finally putting exhaust on my car.
If you know me thats a big deal.
Now the question is 2.25 or 2.5?
Keeping in mind that sound is a huge deal and the 2.25 set-up is damn near free.
Whichever one I end up with it will have at least one resonater.
So what do you think?



Save a Tranny, Roll-on
15.3@88m.p.h.(I/E)
15.2@94m.p.h.(S/C'd)
15.5@89m.p.h.(Stock GTP)


Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 10:57 AM
dam i run better times than you s/c'd , LOL

and im a auto , 14.52@94 is my best

im running a pacesetter header coated , 2 1/4" cat , and rk/magnaflow 2 1/4" catback , ive got all 2 1/4" piping , and no resonator

ive got to add 1 badly though its pretty loud


im pretty happy with the 2 1/4" piping







Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 11:14 AM
If you don't go with 2.5" you'll regret it......

Hell, even without hte s/c you should go with 2.5"



Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 11:20 AM
ya i know 2.5 is probably the way to go.
I guess I was debating wheter the sound to performance ratio would be worth it.
Any input?



Save a Tranny, Roll-on
15.3@88m.p.h.(I/E)
15.2@94m.p.h.(S/C'd)
15.5@89m.p.h.(Stock GTP)

Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 11:38 AM
YES!

You want your S/C to breathe dont you? Don't be budget minded when it comes to your car. If your gonna do something, do it right hte first time around



Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 12:17 PM
not really budget minded as much as sound minded
but i get your point. 2.5in is the way to go
Thanks



Save a Tranny, Roll-on
15.3@88m.p.h.(I/E)
15.2@94m.p.h.(S/C'd)
15.5@89m.p.h.(Stock GTP)

Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 12:20 PM
thats what ive had on my car since a month after i bought it lol.....im even thinking of going 3" with the mods i plan on doing.....



2000 Camaro V6.
| SLP Loudmouth | CAI Intake | HID's |


Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 12:21 PM
a 1.5 second gain in the 1/4 mile is nothing to sneez at

the 2 1/4" is working great for me


my only complaint is the muffler rk spec out from magnaflow , and no resonator


i will be adding a 18" resonator soon


i think unless your spending all the time at the drag strip , 2 1/4" is a good way to go


once i put a M62 , and more than 10 psi at it , ill stick to 2 1/4"







Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 12:24 PM
BlackZ2401 wrote:If your gonna do something, do it right hte first time around


Yep, I should have went with 2 1/4in instead.



>>>For Sale? Clicky!<<<
-----The orginal Mr.Goodwrench on the JBO since 11/99-----

Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 12:42 PM
i got some peiced together exhuast and i love it now.

stans header, no cat, 45inch 2.5inch glasspack, RK 2 1/4 around the gas tank over the axle and then a 2.5inch dynomax muffler.

that set up i am the happiest with by far as for sound and performance.




Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 1:03 PM
I have the stock manifold, no cat. converter, 26" cherry bomb glasspack as resonator, and a Magnaflow wide-open series muffler with an LS Sport tip welded on. All of it is 2 1/4" though I still have stock axle bend .

I love it, I'll get a header someday, just in no real rush to right now.






Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 1:14 PM
^^^ your missing the GP that is going for headers right now


SHAME ON YOU JOE






Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 1:29 PM
I was just going to say that Jake is using a Dynomax Superturbo and if sound is you concern a Dynomax Super Turbo and a resonator will be you best bet.


2004 Grand Prix GTP (Competition Group)
SOLD-->1999 Z24 5M-#30 to register on JBO
"You can please some of the people some of the time but you can't please all the people'
all the time


Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 2:28 PM
[quote=97cavie24ls(JDM&00s/c sedans™)]^^^ your missing the GP that is going for headers right now


SHAME ON YOU JOE
I'm not a big fan of Pacesetter nor some of their employees .

Kidding! Guess it's worth getting the ceramic coated header. Maybe .





Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 2:30 PM
Joe Schulte (JoeDM) wrote:[quote=97cavie24ls(JDM&00s/c sedans™)]^^^ your missing the GP that is going for headers right now


SHAME ON YOU JOE

I'm not a big fan of Pacesetter nor some of their employees .

Kidding! Guess it's worth getting the ceramic coated header. Maybe .


hmmmmmmmm

bash , bunch of stickers and a black cavalier


hmmmmmmmmmmm


muhahhahahahahahaaaa







Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 3:25 PM
I think any boosted J (regardless if it is charger, or turbo) should have 3 inch exhaust no questions. I really think 2.5 is the nest for N/A (on the 2.4's).

I would agree for sound a dynomax super turbo would be good, and I would not put a resantor.



FU Tuning



Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 3:33 PM
I've heard otherwise. some people have in fact complained about losing a bit too much lowend for unboosted 2.5.

I have 2.25 and am gonna keep using that once I get my charger, Nothing wrong with it at low boost levels. once you start breaking 10 psi's and such I think should people be really worried about 2.5 or even 3. on a supercharged engine. But what the hell do I know I don't even have a charger yet


T_T......



Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 3:52 PM
BLWN Z24 wrote:not really budget minded as much as sound minded
but i get your point. 2.5in is the way to go
Thanks


If you're so worried about sound, get the biggest resonator you can fit and call it a day.



www.kronosperformance.com / 732-742-8837

Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 4:36 PM
Inari wrote:I've heard otherwise. some people have in fact complained about losing a bit too much lowend for unboosted 2.5.

I have 2.25 and am gonna keep using that once I get my charger, Nothing wrong with it at low boost levels. once you start breaking 10 psi's and such I think should people be really worried about 2.5 or even 3. on a supercharged engine. But what the hell do I know I don't even have a charger yet


T_T......


I will agree on a N/A with only a intake, 2.50 is too big, but if you do a header and full exhaust TB etc.. you will gain. My car did not lose anything at all.



FU Tuning



Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 7:48 PM
well considering the cobalt cup cars raced last season with a 3" exhaust making very close to 300 whp


and the racing season next year , they are doing 2 1/2" exhaust


that should tell you 3" is way to big for street use on a s/c

and 2 1/2" is big for a n/a motor


also hahn like to use 2 1/4" on the turbo cars









Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 8:41 PM
[quote=97cavie24ls(JDM&00s/c sedans™)]well considering the cobalt cup cars raced last season with a 3" exhaust making very close to 300 whp


and the racing season next year , they are doing 2 1/2" exhaust


that should tell you 3" is way to big for street use on a s/c

and 2 1/2" is big for a n/a motor


also hahn like to use 2 1/4" on the turbo cars

No that does not mean that. Like we have all said many times before, every set-up is different. I know of about 3-4 2.4's running 2.5 exhaust on n/a cars and they are stronger than when they ran with 2.25 exhaust. Couple of those cars without cats as well.



FU Tuning




Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 11:21 PM
Interesting.... cause I had 2.5" exhaust when I was n/a . Only other mods were intake and 62mm throttle body and I ran a 15 flat.



Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Friday, December 16, 2005 11:27 PM
I know I only gained 2-3 whp from going to 2.25 to 2.5 but I lost tq all over the band...



LE61T PTE6262 Powered

Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Saturday, December 17, 2005 4:47 AM
I <3 my torque.





Re: GM S/C Exhaust
Saturday, December 17, 2005 5:51 AM
i went from a 2.25 to a 2.5. I did a pacesetter header and 2.5" from the down pipe to the exhaust there was a difference in the set up for the better exactly how much i am not sure. But a definate gain from the bottom end to the top end.


2004 Grand Prix GTP (Competition Group)
SOLD-->1999 Z24 5M-#30 to register on JBO
"You can please some of the people some of the time but you can't please all the people'
all the time


Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search