Chambered mufflers - Performance Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
Chambered mufflers
Monday, October 30, 2006 1:53 PM
How much of a sound and performance difference will a 2 chamber vs. 3 chamber mufler make

I have a pacesetter ceramic eco header, 2.25" magnaflow high flow cat, 2.25" manderal bent catback piping, I still have to pick a resonator and mufler. From taking a few pics and measuresments I figure a 29" (I know 27" is a more common size, I'll prolly go with that) resonator will be a good fit, and for a mufler I'm debating between flowmaster 40 series (2 chamber) and flowmaster 50 series (3 chamber). No fart cans here, this is for the daily driver so I want to keep it as quite as possible without giving up power, so back to the original question..... How much of a sound and performance difference will a 2 chamber vs. 3 chamber mufler make?




Re: Chambered mufflers
Monday, October 30, 2006 3:29 PM
the more chambers the quieter and deeper it is, really depends on how its made. flow can be prettymuch on par with a straight through design again depending on manufacturer. there are also alot of other things to look at like physical size (concludes how close together the chambers are). I myself run 3 chambers and they can get plenty loud when you "honk" on the go-pedal. two's seem to be too loud when i'm on the hwy.


_______________________
** Flat Broke Racing Inc.**
Re: Chambered mufflers
Monday, October 30, 2006 6:57 PM
um, i had the understanding that flowmasters, all series of them, are loud and annoying.

you need a 25" dynomax super turbo. last time i say it.



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Sold my beloved J in April 2010 -
Re: Chambered mufflers
Monday, October 30, 2006 7:14 PM
it preaty much came down to super turbo or 60 series (meant for 4 cylinders and small 6 cylinders, 3 chamber design), I've heard people say both sound liek @!#$ and I've heard people say both sound good. I'm still trying to deciede between the 2, I've heard flowmaster 40 series and dynomax super turbo both on an axle back eco with an otherwise stock exhaust. Both sounded good, the 40 sounded quiter of the 2 and the 60 is serpossed to be considerably quiter then the 40 series. But the Dynomax has offset inlet center outlet which is what I want. The 60 series has center inlet center outlet or center inlet offest outlet. I've yet to find an eco with my same exhaust setup so I can hear it

and there is no 25" dynomax in any size, bigest body for 2.25" inlet is a 14"


but I think I decieded I'm gonna use THIS as my resonator



Re: Chambered mufflers
Monday, October 30, 2006 7:35 PM
I did just find a 20" mufler, overall length is 25" if thats what your thinking of, the mufler itself isn't that big though, but the more I look the more I'm liking that one



Re: Chambered mufflers
Monday, October 30, 2006 7:46 PM
Ok so heres the layout

I have the paceseter ceramic coated header
I have the Magnaflow high flow cat
I have this that I'm using the for the 2.25" manderal bent piping


and


I want this Magnaflow 4" round 22" long mufler as a resontor
I want Dynomax Super Turbo # 17747 or # 17767 (I don't know what the difference is, specs are the same)
I want a gay looking galvanized 2.25" turndown as a tip, no bling, no 4" outlet, stock and stupid looking








Edited 1 time(s). Last edited Monday, October 30, 2006 7:57 PM


Re: Chambered mufflers
Monday, October 30, 2006 8:22 PM
Apexi- turbo muffer, soooo deeep and sounds soooo good, thinking about what my car use to sound like gives me a chubby!! Mine was straight from the turbo back, 3 inch, with the apexi muffler, sounded amazing, loud obivously because it was straight 3 inch, but it was really deep and sounded great. I dont like to brag, but to me, my car was the best sounding cavalier i have ever heard, with my taste anyway. One of my friends, he owns a 3rd gen camaro, and he kept telling me that no matter what, you couldnt ever get a 4cyl to sound good....he was pleasantly suprised, and thought that my car sounded better than his small block!
Re: Chambered mufflers
Monday, October 30, 2006 8:25 PM
turbo back 3" strightpipe with a fart can doesn't even remotely aply to this thread, thanks anyway though



Re: Chambered mufflers
Monday, October 30, 2006 9:04 PM
Darkstars wrote:Ok so heres the layout

I have the paceseter ceramic coated header
I have the Magnaflow high flow cat
I have this that I'm using the for the 2.25" manderal bent piping


and


I want this Magnaflow 4" round 22" long mufler as a resontor
I want Dynomax Super Turbo # 17747 or # 17767 (I don't know what the difference is, specs are the same)
I want a gay looking galvanized 2.25" turndown as a tip, no bling, no 4" outlet, stock and stupid looking


That's somewhat what I have. Personally I don't like the sound of flowmaster mufflers. They resonate at the muffler.

Right now on the car I have a 2.25 inch comp. bend exhaust, 12 in resonator, magnaflow (non polished) muffler, with a "non-flashy" turndown like you described. It could be quieter (if that's a word,lol), but with the large resonator and super turbo muffler you are putting on it should be fairly quiet.

Just my two cents.



Re: Chambered mufflers
Monday, October 30, 2006 9:14 PM
It isnt a fart can, not hardly. It is a muffler. Sounds absolutly nothing like a fart can, not here sir. Apexi WS2, great muffler.
Re: Chambered mufflers
Monday, October 30, 2006 9:18 PM
Also, dont go with flowmasters....I had a flowmaster 60 series on before the WS2, I didnt like it at all. Resonated beyond believe, and it was quite a bit louder than the WS2, but I just read your posts again, and you want it stock looking out the back, i guess the WS2 isnt goign to help you there.

Re: Chambered mufflers
Monday, October 30, 2006 9:27 PM
^^^ in my head I was thinking of the N1, my bad.


and yeah as close to stock looking as possible and quite as possible without sacrifcing power. this is for the my beater/daily driver cav, I already have one cav I would get pulled over in all the time hahahah I don' want this one to end up the same.


and btw the Dynomax has a 90 day money back gaurantee if your not satisfied so I think that just made up my mind. Problem is I don't know when I'll actually get aorund to installing all this, originally I was thinking in the spring sometime before autoX season starts.



Re: Chambered mufflers
Monday, October 30, 2006 9:34 PM
I have a similiar setup to what you are talking about.. I can try to get a sound clip or video of it..I love the way it sounds..has a nice little rumble when you get on it..but most people don't even know I have an aftermarket exhaust.



Re: Chambered mufflers
Monday, October 30, 2006 9:36 PM
^^^ thats what I want to hear

which resontor are you running and do you still have stock header?



Re: Chambered mufflers
Tuesday, October 31, 2006 5:05 AM
you're on crack if you think the 20/25" dynomax is a "small" muffler. its practically the same size as stock. just flows better. i have the 17747. the 67 i believe has an extra bracket or something so it can be used as a bolt on for specific cars, hence why its also more expensive. i originally had the 14/18" muffler and the interior resonance was ungodly. when i switched it out to the larger muffler, it was such a difference that i was actually debating whether i had gone TOO quiet. but i later got over it. my setup is pacesetter, cat 94035, 26/31" thrush resonator, 2.25" piping, and then the 17747. i honestly think its as quiet as you're gonna get (it does have a slight rumble to it, but nothing like most other setups), without going to an actual oem muffler like walker or something.



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Sold my beloved J in April 2010 -
Re: Chambered mufflers
Tuesday, October 31, 2006 5:50 AM
Viper98912 wrote:you're on crack if you think the 20/25" dynomax is a "small" muffler. its practically the same size as stock. just flows better. i have the 17747. the 67 i believe has an extra bracket or something so it can be used as a bolt on for specific cars, hence why its also more expensive. i originally had the 14/18" muffler and the interior resonance was ungodly. when i switched it out to the larger muffler, it was such a difference that i was actually debating whether i had gone TOO quiet. but i later got over it. my setup is pacesetter, cat 94035, 26/31" thrush resonator, 2.25" piping, and then the 17747. i honestly think its as quiet as you're gonna get (it does have a slight rumble to it, but nothing like most other setups), without going to an actual oem muffler like walker or something.




I didn't say it was small, I saying it isn't that big... as in the muffler itself wasn't a full 25" when you look up the 25" muffler. I thought the you were saying the muffler body was surpossed to be 25". 20" is not as big. Make sence?

Also do you have asound/video clip of yours? originally I was thing about a glasspack but I didn't expect it to do as much as the actual magnaflow muffler I listed earlier in this thread.



Re: Chambered mufflers
Tuesday, October 31, 2006 6:34 AM
My setup(2.2ohv):
SS header
High flow cat
Glasspack
Dynomax Super turbo
Turndown instead of some gay looking tip
Crush bent piping

I'm pleased with it. It has a nice rumble to it at idle and doesn't get very loud under acceleration. Resonance is not an issue. The muffler doesn't flow as good as a straight through coffee can by any means though (noticable drop in power after it was put on). As far as the magnaflow vs. glasspack, I would go with the glasspack since it probably weighs a lot less.



Re: Chambered mufflers
Tuesday, October 31, 2006 6:40 AM
i agree it is a little hard to differentiate and compare mufflers by body length or overall length. i've had to use both on jbo before because ppl get confused between mufflers.

ANYWAY
i've noticed over the years that posting audio of exhausts is a really bad way to make comparisons because audio always sounds different than real world. but anyway, here's a clip that i took in my interior. the first part of the clip is around 3/4 throttle, and the rest of it is light throttle. it honestly sounds more resonant than it really is in real life, i guess the only comparison to it would be to compare the loudness of the blinker clicking and the dash (and suspension) banging around when hitting a pothole. the mic was also catching a lot of noise from the engine bay. hope it helps.

Linky goes vrooooooom



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Sold my beloved J in April 2010 -
Re: Chambered mufflers
Tuesday, October 31, 2006 6:47 AM
the exhaust is all in how it is set up, muffler selection and placement, resonator placement, piping size, etc.

The exhaust on my car is loud as hell at idle, its quiet as stock almost when your cruising around and lightly accelerating and when you honk on it, its loud as hell but not raspy its deep and mellow.

http://www.jegs.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?lang=-1&catalogId=10002&storeId=10001&categoryId=13795

if these are the mufflers your talking about, i promis you wont be dissapointed!


_______________________
** Flat Broke Racing Inc.**
Re: Chambered mufflers
Tuesday, October 31, 2006 6:29 PM
Viper98912 wrote:i agree it is a little hard to differentiate and compare mufflers by body length or overall length. i've had to use both on jbo before because ppl get confused between mufflers.

ANYWAY
i've noticed over the years that posting audio of exhausts is a really bad way to make comparisons because audio always sounds different than real world. but anyway, here's a clip that i took in my interior. the first part of the clip is around 3/4 throttle, and the rest of it is light throttle. it honestly sounds more resonant than it really is in real life, i guess the only comparison to it would be to compare the loudness of the blinker clicking and the dash (and suspension) banging around when hitting a pothole. the mic was also catching a lot of noise from the engine bay. hope it helps.

Linky goes vrooooooom



that helps alot. I'm going with same muffler and resonantor as you


btw I LOL'd at the pothole hahahah that sounded BAD


anyways thanks alot, much apreciated



Re: Chambered mufflers
Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:14 PM
dynomax super turbo ftw! quiet@idle, good flow at WOT.


1971 camaro 427 --- here!

Stock... and loving every minute of it.

Re: Chambered mufflers
Monday, November 06, 2006 11:33 AM
just bought the muffler and resontor



Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search