KevinP (Stabby McShankyou) wrote:
and I'm NOT a pedo. everyone knows i've got a wheelchair fetish.
Quote:
And while were on topic about things declining Democracy as we know it does not exist. We live in a MediaOcracy (canada and usa). Patriot Act and anti-terrorist act have left us with no rights. Large corporations own everything and control everything and there isnt anything we can do about it. welcome to the future. The media actually convinced people 9/11 was a terrorist act when in fact it was the US Government behind it. This is no "conspiracy" as that word is mainly used to make truths into beliefs and biased views.
Knoxfire wrote:To take this seriously...
Why is the end of democracy a bad thing? Democracy has never guaranteed freedom. Just ask the people living in Nazi Germany in the 40's or Russia today how they feel about the democracies they live in. Also, the United-States has always been a fairly weak democracy. In your presidential elections you usually have TWO choices. Two, if I may remind you, is thissssss close to just having one; and one is the same as having none. In Canada we have four valid choices for prime minister for example. A democracy just means that you elect people to act "in your best interest" and your best interest is up to them to decide, if you know what I mean.
Also, peak oil? Meh, no more oil simply means no more industrial age. Granted, this could precipitate a third world war when the reserves get low, but again who cares? Always bet on human greed to trump anything else. The oil economy's collapse will only mean that the people who control it will move on to some other way of making money. They want to stay fat and rich, count on that. And a war economy is no way to have stable wealth. Yeah, you'll get rich but it's like staying warm by burning your house. Do that for too long and you'll get a hell of a surprise. A war economy is just a way to keep the OTHER guy from making money too and forcing both of you to toss good wealth after bad in a war until the one who manages to keep the most wealth wins.
Lastly, I think people have been bred to rely on the government too damn much. Don't like this modern age of being watched? Fine. Sell everything you own, hide some food money, and go live on the street. No one will bother you. You can live for more than thirty years on less than ten grand that way.
Everyone seems to want everything at the same time. You can't have luxury, freedom, stability and wealth all at once unless you were born a millionaire. So forget it.
We have one freedom in the world, just one, and it's something that a lot of people don't have. The freedom to be a rat in the walls of the west. We are spectacularly fat and wealthy and wasteful here and there are plenty of crumbs for a clever rat to live off of.
Shifted wrote:Quote:
And while were on topic about things declining Democracy as we know it does not exist. We live in a MediaOcracy (canada and usa). Patriot Act and anti-terrorist act have left us with no rights. Large corporations own everything and control everything and there isnt anything we can do about it. welcome to the future. The media actually convinced people 9/11 was a terrorist act when in fact it was the US Government behind it. This is no "conspiracy" as that word is mainly used to make truths into beliefs and biased views.
And that just made me laugh, you really need to get some kind of education, because anybody with an IQ can see right through that mainstream conspiracy theory bull@!#$.
Myles wrote:Knoxfire wrote:To take this seriously...
Why is the end of democracy a bad thing? Democracy has never guaranteed freedom. Just ask the people living in Nazi Germany in the 40's or Russia today how they feel about the democracies they live in. Also, the United-States has always been a fairly weak democracy. In your presidential elections you usually have TWO choices. Two, if I may remind you, is thissssss close to just having one; and one is the same as having none. In Canada we have four valid choices for prime minister for example. A democracy just means that you elect people to act "in your best interest" and your best interest is up to them to decide, if you know what I mean.
Also, peak oil? Meh, no more oil simply means no more industrial age. Granted, this could precipitate a third world war when the reserves get low, but again who cares? Always bet on human greed to trump anything else. The oil economy's collapse will only mean that the people who control it will move on to some other way of making money. They want to stay fat and rich, count on that. And a war economy is no way to have stable wealth. Yeah, you'll get rich but it's like staying warm by burning your house. Do that for too long and you'll get a hell of a surprise. A war economy is just a way to keep the OTHER guy from making money too and forcing both of you to toss good wealth after bad in a war until the one who manages to keep the most wealth wins.
Lastly, I think people have been bred to rely on the government too damn much. Don't like this modern age of being watched? Fine. Sell everything you own, hide some food money, and go live on the street. No one will bother you. You can live for more than thirty years on less than ten grand that way.
Everyone seems to want everything at the same time. You can't have luxury, freedom, stability and wealth all at once unless you were born a millionaire. So forget it.
We have one freedom in the world, just one, and it's something that a lot of people don't have. The freedom to be a rat in the walls of the west. We are spectacularly fat and wealthy and wasteful here and there are plenty of crumbs for a clever rat to live off of.
Thanks to contributing an intelligent relevant post unlike some other people.
Nobody likes what will happen so we just gotta learn to live with it. Europe's gas prices are sky high because russia supplies them. If we had prices like that over here we would be in better shape. we are going to see a war of resources and its started already. Iraq for instance. The media actually has people thinking there were WMD, then it was about democracy (more bs lies). They are there for oil.
We are entering a new age soon.
Does anybody realize when loans are lent for automobiles, mortgages, credit cards they create bank notes with your signature. Creating money can only do one thing and thats bring debt to society so in the end theres just lots of debt. Its how banks have been operating since the early 1900s sadly enough.
Im still living my life and getting on with my activities. When gas prices go up ill drive less.
Shifted wrote:Myles wrote:Knoxfire wrote:To take this seriously...
Why is the end of democracy a bad thing? Democracy has never guaranteed freedom. Just ask the people living in Nazi Germany in the 40's or Russia today how they feel about the democracies they live in. Also, the United-States has always been a fairly weak democracy. In your presidential elections you usually have TWO choices. Two, if I may remind you, is thissssss close to just having one; and one is the same as having none. In Canada we have four valid choices for prime minister for example. A democracy just means that you elect people to act "in your best interest" and your best interest is up to them to decide, if you know what I mean.
Also, peak oil? Meh, no more oil simply means no more industrial age. Granted, this could precipitate a third world war when the reserves get low, but again who cares? Always bet on human greed to trump anything else. The oil economy's collapse will only mean that the people who control it will move on to some other way of making money. They want to stay fat and rich, count on that. And a war economy is no way to have stable wealth. Yeah, you'll get rich but it's like staying warm by burning your house. Do that for too long and you'll get a hell of a surprise. A war economy is just a way to keep the OTHER guy from making money too and forcing both of you to toss good wealth after bad in a war until the one who manages to keep the most wealth wins.
Lastly, I think people have been bred to rely on the government too damn much. Don't like this modern age of being watched? Fine. Sell everything you own, hide some food money, and go live on the street. No one will bother you. You can live for more than thirty years on less than ten grand that way.
Everyone seems to want everything at the same time. You can't have luxury, freedom, stability and wealth all at once unless you were born a millionaire. So forget it.
We have one freedom in the world, just one, and it's something that a lot of people don't have. The freedom to be a rat in the walls of the west. We are spectacularly fat and wealthy and wasteful here and there are plenty of crumbs for a clever rat to live off of.
Thanks to contributing an intelligent relevant post unlike some other people.
Nobody likes what will happen so we just gotta learn to live with it. Europe's gas prices are sky high because russia supplies them. If we had prices like that over here we would be in better shape. we are going to see a war of resources and its started already. Iraq for instance. The media actually has people thinking there were WMD, then it was about democracy (more bs lies). They are there for oil.
We are entering a new age soon.
Does anybody realize when loans are lent for automobiles, mortgages, credit cards they create bank notes with your signature. Creating money can only do one thing and thats bring debt to society so in the end theres just lots of debt. Its how banks have been operating since the early 1900s sadly enough.
Im still living my life and getting on with my activities. When gas prices go up ill drive less.
1. Read this: http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/company_level_imports/current/import.html
You see where Iraq is on that list? Saudia Arabia is #2, and Canada almost doubles it (see Total imports per day, bottom list). So America, being in Iraq for oil, to take the #2 oil country? If our motives were oil, don't you think we would have annexed Saudi? At least have made it a province? Have you seen oil imports from there go up AT ALL since Desert Storm started? No. If America wanted to take over a country for oil, it sure would be Canada. Largest undefended border in the world, one of the smaller military forces, very small navy, very small air-force, etc.
2. Loans... there hasn't been enough gold to back up the paper and coin money since long before the 1930's. Its not how the banks have been operating, its how EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD has been operating. You think Canada, Japan, China, Europe, etc have any tangible backing to ANY of their money? Hell no.
Really by coming here and posting all of this bull@!#$ I don't have to question your intelligence, you are putting it out there for everybody to see.
Quote:
1. Read this: http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/company_level_imports/current/import.html
1. You see where Iraq is on that list? Saudia Arabia is #2, and Canada almost doubles it (see Total imports per day, bottom list). So America, being in Iraq for oil, to take the #2 oil country? If our motives were oil, don't you think we would have annexed Saudi? At least have made it a province? Have you seen oil imports from there go up AT ALL since Desert Storm started? No. If America wanted to take over a country for oil, it sure would be Canada. Largest undefended border in the world, one of the smaller military forces, very small navy, very small air-force, etc.
Myles wrote:Shifted wrote:Myles wrote:Knoxfire wrote:To take this seriously...
Why is the end of democracy a bad thing? Democracy has never guaranteed freedom. Just ask the people living in Nazi Germany in the 40's or Russia today how they feel about the democracies they live in. Also, the United-States has always been a fairly weak democracy. In your presidential elections you usually have TWO choices. Two, if I may remind you, is thissssss close to just having one; and one is the same as having none. In Canada we have four valid choices for prime minister for example. A democracy just means that you elect people to act "in your best interest" and your best interest is up to them to decide, if you know what I mean.
Also, peak oil? Meh, no more oil simply means no more industrial age. Granted, this could precipitate a third world war when the reserves get low, but again who cares? Always bet on human greed to trump anything else. The oil economy's collapse will only mean that the people who control it will move on to some other way of making money. They want to stay fat and rich, count on that. And a war economy is no way to have stable wealth. Yeah, you'll get rich but it's like staying warm by burning your house. Do that for too long and you'll get a hell of a surprise. A war economy is just a way to keep the OTHER guy from making money too and forcing both of you to toss good wealth after bad in a war until the one who manages to keep the most wealth wins.
Lastly, I think people have been bred to rely on the government too damn much. Don't like this modern age of being watched? Fine. Sell everything you own, hide some food money, and go live on the street. No one will bother you. You can live for more than thirty years on less than ten grand that way.
Everyone seems to want everything at the same time. You can't have luxury, freedom, stability and wealth all at once unless you were born a millionaire. So forget it.
We have one freedom in the world, just one, and it's something that a lot of people don't have. The freedom to be a rat in the walls of the west. We are spectacularly fat and wealthy and wasteful here and there are plenty of crumbs for a clever rat to live off of.
Thanks to contributing an intelligent relevant post unlike some other people.
Nobody likes what will happen so we just gotta learn to live with it. Europe's gas prices are sky high because russia supplies them. If we had prices like that over here we would be in better shape. we are going to see a war of resources and its started already. Iraq for instance. The media actually has people thinking there were WMD, then it was about democracy (more bs lies). They are there for oil.
We are entering a new age soon.
Does anybody realize when loans are lent for automobiles, mortgages, credit cards they create bank notes with your signature. Creating money can only do one thing and thats bring debt to society so in the end theres just lots of debt. Its how banks have been operating since the early 1900s sadly enough.
Im still living my life and getting on with my activities. When gas prices go up ill drive less.
1. Read this: http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/company_level_imports/current/import.html
You see where Iraq is on that list? Saudia Arabia is #2, and Canada almost doubles it (see Total imports per day, bottom list). So America, being in Iraq for oil, to take the #2 oil country? If our motives were oil, don't you think we would have annexed Saudi? At least have made it a province? Have you seen oil imports from there go up AT ALL since Desert Storm started? No. If America wanted to take over a country for oil, it sure would be Canada. Largest undefended border in the world, one of the smaller military forces, very small navy, very small air-force, etc.
2. Loans... there hasn't been enough gold to back up the paper and coin money since long before the 1930's. Its not how the banks have been operating, its how EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD has been operating. You think Canada, Japan, China, Europe, etc have any tangible backing to ANY of their money? Hell no.
Really by coming here and posting all of this bull@!#$ I don't have to question your intelligence, you are putting it out there for everybody to see.
I think you missed my point.
America can't literally take the oil from iraq, but control it because it would be in volation of UN rules which it doesnt seem to listen to anyway so yeah I think they are stealing some oil over there for sure. They break every other law out there why not some more. The united states is/have been building military bases overseas. Why wouldnt they be stockpiling oil for themselves. Good strategy if you ask me.
I could care less what some people on the internet think of me as it has no relevance. Ignorance is bliss as some say.
Quote:
because we can get back our freedom
Taetsch Z-24 wrote:We WILL NEVER run out of oil.
Thats all.
Chris
RandomGuy 171 wrote:GEORGE BUSH HATES BLACK PEOPLE!
Rodimus Prime wrote:yea there will be an end to oil and it will be during this century
GAM (The Kilted One) wrote:Peak oil is an interesting theory.
Might I draw attention to the fact that it's still a THEORY. The biggest problem with oil at this point is that the high-pressure fields are fewer and farther between, and most of the newer fields that have been found are low-pressure ones that require different extraction methods.
Hell, the Alberta oil sands can sustain Canada and the US on their own for the next 75 years given today's growth rates. That means turning off every other source of oil.
2 new refineries are scheduled for construction in Canada, and there are 4 new fractionation refineries set for Khazakhstan (sp?) if my memory serves me. To top that off, China has plans to build new high-efficiency and high-volume refining facilities over the next 10 years to meet domestic supply, as it stands, they're buying most of their refined chemicals from Canada/US and Mid-East companies and shipping/piping them in... (If you want in interesting bit of conspiracy theory, look up how the Taliban hitched up plans to build a pipeline from Khazakhistan to China.)
Should we try and get off oil as a primary energy source? OF COURSE. It's finite, it's pollutive and destructive, and it's a bitch to clean up.
Solar/Wind/Tidal generation of electricity is the answer... but we still need all that liquid carbon, we just oughtta use it a little more carefully.
GAM (The Kilted One) wrote:Sure *we* will if we never develop another energy source that renews itself faster than oil.
However, for the amount of CO2 that gets released when an oil based energy source is used: We'll likely never have to worry about it because the CO2 will hit a toxic level in the atmosphere... especially when *we're* destroying the rain forest at a rate that basically guarentees 90% of what was available in 1960 will be gone, and the CO2 removal (let alone the biodiversity) capacity will be gone as well.