Have any of you heard the latest ? Apparently another womens body has washed up where Lacy's body was found and along with evidence that was surpressed during his first trial Scott Peterson MAY be getting another one! The defence is claiming to have numerous witnesses that saw lacy walking the dog and getting grabbed and shoved into a brown van. And get this! The police looked for and found the van, but because it was parked in front of an abandoned building thats known for drugs the cops were too fearfull to enter to do a full search even tho it was reported that a pregnant women matching Lacy's description was seen by several people being forced from the van and into the building!
I know he was a cheating piece of crap but it looks like maybe he actualy didn't kill her!
So it looks like we may be in for a part 2 of his trial.
What do you guys think?
Semper Fi SAINT. May you rest in peace.
screw that..the @!#$ is guilty...he needs to fry regardless...The trial took too damn long and got too much news coverage to begin with.
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b120/onlyatmidnight12/hurt.jpg
im a @!#$ pussy ass liar! i lied to my girlfriend over and over, sat around with her friends naked and stayed home downloading porn...she loved me and i hurt her...i deserve to be alone and unhappy...no wonder every girl i try to love leaves me...i suck.
Her blood and hair were found on his boat...he did it.
On another note, her mother has been fighting to gain control of her insurance policy even though it was suppose to go to Scott, a judge finally appointed her the money, which I am glad of. He doesnt deserve money or a trial, he deserves to sit in jail and think about what he did for the rest of his life.
Slug,........ No I don't remember any hair found in his boat or blood for that matter. They did find hair and blood in the garage and on a pair of plier I think. The whole case was circumstantial as no one PROVED he did it. It was just bunches of maybes on the prosecutions half.
Gonzo, I'm all up for a good bad guy fry but this case has stunk from the start. They have NO hard evidence. This is the reason I think he got life instead of the DP. Please correct me if I'm wrong as this was years ago and I'm a bit fuzzy on all the details.
Semper Fi SAINT. May you rest in peace.
So is this an episode of CSI and that's why people care about this?
______________________________________________________________
ToBoGgAn wrote:we are gonna take it in the ass and like it, cause thats what america does.
Slo2pt2 (Projekt Unknown?) wrote:One my SON is ADHD N.O.S and Autistic Spectrum Disorder. I will nto medicate him he will battle throught this himself and learn to control it.
No another dead woman washed up that fits the Lacy murder profile and Scott is locked up so it couldn't have been him this time. So that leaves 2 possibilities, 1 Scott didn't really kill her as hes claimed all along or 2 they have a copy cat on their hands.
Semper Fi SAINT. May you rest in peace.
Well, I think he did it. But if another woman was found it could get interesting.
Jackalope wrote:No another dead woman washed up that fits the Lacy murder profile and Scott is locked up so it couldn't have been him this time. So that leaves 2 possibilities, 1 Scott didn't really kill her as hes claimed all along or 2 they have a copy cat on their hands.
Or a third possibility... Maybe Scott killed more than one woman and his second victim is just now surfacing.
I agree that this whole case has been shakey from the start. My opinion is that he was convicted because the jury couldn't get past that he was a cheating husband whose wife turned up dead, regardless of any evidence.
This is one of those times where the death penalty wasn't the right choice. The whole Tookie debate was different, he was 100% cold blooded killer, Scott may be innocent after all this is over.
John Wilken
2002 Cavalier
2.2 Vin code 4
Auto
Jackalope wrote: The police looked for and found the van, but because it was parked in front of an abandoned building thats known for drugs the cops were too fearfull to enter to do a full search even tho it was reported that a pregnant women matching Lacy's description was seen by several people being forced from the van and into the building!
I don't buy this. If the cops found a van matching the description they would check inside the building, they wouldn't let some druggists stop them. If it was only one or two cops there, they would call for every available cop in the area to help them out, swarm the place. Scott did it, he killed her and death is to good for him, he needs 50 more years of nightly "visits" by big, angry men.
Zero, I'm only retelling what was said on the news I don't know. But if the state thinks they may have made a mistake then the case should be re-opened.
Semper Fi SAINT. May you rest in peace.
I've seen some of the evidence (in news reports, take it for what it's worth), and it doesn't all add up pointing to him being the killer.
I think he was convicted because he's a real bastard, and his behaviour afterwards was very suspect. I'm not saying he did or didn't, but IIRC the prosecution was talking about how cement weights were used to weigh down the body, but all the piers that were made were recovered, that sticks out foremost in my mind.
Anyhow, I don't know the full detail of the case.
Jimmy: IIRC the unexplained leave was when Bush went from the Texas ANG to the Alabama ANG (where there were no aircraft???) to try and get a friend of his father's elected to the Senate, I might be wrong there, but, I do know that he was "unobserved" and didn't fulfill his entire credit requirement for the commitment until he got a 75 unit credit at the end of the commitment... This at the time when it was routine that you'd fulfill a 4 year credit within 2 years or so.
I don't know about the authenticity of the documents, but it's clear that he was still valliently defending the skies of Houston from Viet Cong only as long as it was expedient.
Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.
Thats what I was getting at Gam. He did a lot of bad / stupid / wrong things but there wasn't anything directly linking him with her murder and with new evidence that has come out as to how the police covered up some very relivent facts in this case then it should be re-tried.
Jimmy, I am fully aware that not everything in the media is 100% correct but I find it strage how a post about Scott Peterson can all of a sudden turn to Bush. Odd isn't it ?
But to answer your question as to the missing time Gam is correct Bush was with a friend of his fathers working for his campaign. There is now and has always been some contension over this as he swears he was on leave and so did a retired senior officer from his command but it seems those papers that could prove he was are curiously missing. Cover up ? Who knows.
Semper Fi SAINT. May you rest in peace.
Jackalope wrote:Zero, I'm only retelling what was said on the news I don't know. But if the state thinks they may have made a mistake then the case should be re-opened.
I didn't mean for my post to come across like I was accusing you of lying or anything, I wasn't. Sorry.
Jack: A Bush, Cover something up?!?! SAY IT AIN'T SO, PETE!!!
I've read that the state invested quite a lot of money in his trial, and if there was a problem with that, then someone better get ready for a whole LOT of egg on their face. BTW, Copy-cat murders don't happen too often, if he killed someone else, they're going to have quite a time figuring out what happened given that it's, what 4 years hence? After 3-4 months, the evidence is more anthropological than anything due to environmental intrusion and general deterioration.
Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.
Zero, didn't take it the wrong way man, Its all good.
Gam, I know a president cover something up and not be 100% honest ?!?!? What IS the world coming to ? Next they'll be arguing the definition of the word "IS"
Again, I agree completely. If someone suppressed evidence that proves Scotts innocence and the state went thru all that then I personally believe heads will roll ( no pun intended ) But now they have another murder that matches Lacie's and they are scrambling to come up with how and why's. All the while the press are beginning to circle seeing the impending doom and political blood bath to come.
Semper Fi SAINT. May you rest in peace.
Well, until something surfaces to exculpate him, he's staying where he is.
Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.
I still think he did it. I don't care... if I was married, even if I wasn't in love with my husband anymore and was cheating, if he turned up missing I'd be miserable. Not to mention right before they arrested him, he changed his hair color and was trying to leave the country. Innocent people don't flee if they did nothing wrong. And the simple fact that he was more worried about his affair than his missing/dead wife... Scott's own SISTER was even interviewed and she said there was many things leading up to him being the killer. I still think he did it.
And those are the most damning reasons for him to spend the rest of his life in jail they really aren't that good. I agree with you guys, BUT seeing how someone else just turned up dead like Lacy how could Scott have done this one as well ? And that brings us back to # 1 he didn't do it. OR # 2 copy cat killing.
Semper Fi SAINT. May you rest in peace.
Fallen: odd behaviour does not a murderer make. I've only seen some of the evidence, and a lot of it is based on his behaviour. He acted like he was guilty, but we can't be certain it it's because he was guilty of murder or guilty of infidelity. I'm not in the psych feilds, so I can't say for certain. And not-guilty people DO run, if you look somewhat involved, you can become guilty with bad or missing evidence, and missing evidence means that there is room for interpretation, and that's what gets more innocent people convicted than anything. Don't believe everything you see on Law & Order or CSI.
I guess it's a good thing that I can't be selected for Jury duty... I hold evidence to close scrutiny, and if it doesn't suss out, it's not definitive. I guess it's also good that I'm not a Detective or Inspector.
Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.
DAMN WE AGREE AGAIN !?!?!?!? What is the world comeing to ?
Semper Fi SAINT. May you rest in peace.
I think it's because I'd lose my job if I allowed a false-positive to to get through.
Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.
Could be.
Semper Fi SAINT. May you rest in peace.
No, definitely.
I've heard about officers that were re-assigned to desk jobs because they lost ACLSD accredidation due to a screw-up with evidence.
Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.
