Journal of Automobile Engineering wrote:Gasoline–ethanol mixtures may be prepared by
the addition of a certain percentage of ethanol to the
gasoline. Ethanol is completely miscible with water
in all proportions, while gasoline and water are
immiscible [11, 14, 15]. This may cause the blended
fuel to contain water and further result in corrosion
problems on the mechanical components, especially
on the components made of copper, brass, or
aluminium. To minimize this problem in the fuel
delivery system, the materials mentioned above
must be avoided [11, 21]. Ethanol can react with
most rubber and cause a jam in the fuel pipe.
Therefore, it is advised to use fluorocarbon rubber as
a replacement for rubber [11]. Gasoline–ethanol
mixtures, which contain up to 20 vol% ethanol, can
be safely used without causing any damage to engine
parts of the vehicles designed to operate on gasoline
CheesyPackerFan wrote:I am here to spread the truth about E85. Argue all you want, but what is below has been proven.
A common misconception is that E85 will hurt your injectors, kill your fuel pump, and eat through your fuel lines. That is not the case. The only thing you need to do is retune the car OR increase the fuel pressure to provide about 27% more fuel at all times. People can argue all they want to defend replacing everything, but it is a waste of your time and money. The whole idea came from when they first started putting methanol in gas to increase octane when the country went to unleaded fuel. Methanol will eat away all your rubber seals and corrode your fuel lines, but ethanol will not.
Damage can result from ethanol if you do not compensate for the extra needed fuel, and damage from extream heat can hurt the internals of the engine and cause spark knock. Fuel ratios would need to be about 9 to 1, but on a regular wideband you still go by the 14.7 concept. That is because of how widebands and narrowbands read the fuel mixture... they read the oxygen content. Either way, spark knock is very deadly, any tuner knows that.
Ethanol is more powerful than gas, and a great alternative to racing fuel. With a octane rating of 105, you can run more spark advance without risking spark knock.
After about 500miles into the switch from gas to E85, you will need to change your fuel filter. Ethanol is like a natural cleaner, sort of like injector cleaner. All of the deposits in the tank will be sent to the filter.
Like I said, there is no use arguing as what I am saying is already proven. I am simply just trying to spread the word.
Whalesac wrote:CheesyPackerFan wrote:I am here to spread the truth about E85. Argue all you want, but what is below has been proven.
A common misconception is that E85 will hurt your injectors, kill your fuel pump, and eat through your fuel lines. That is not the case. The only thing you need to do is retune the car OR increase the fuel pressure to provide about 27% more fuel at all times. People can argue all they want to defend replacing everything, but it is a waste of your time and money. The whole idea came from when they first started putting methanol in gas to increase octane when the country went to unleaded fuel. Methanol will eat away all your rubber seals and corrode your fuel lines, but ethanol will not.
Damage can result from ethanol if you do not compensate for the extra needed fuel, and damage from extreme heat can hurt the internals of the engine and cause spark knock. Fuel ratios would need to be about 9 to 1, but on a regular wideband you still go by the 14.7 concept. That is because of how widebands and narrowbands read the fuel mixture... they read the oxygen content. Either way, spark knock is very deadly, any tuner knows that.
Ethanol is more powerful than gas, and a great alternative to racing fuel. With a octane rating of 105, you can run more spark advance without risking spark knock.
After about 500miles into the switch from gas to E85, you will need to change your fuel filter. Ethanol is like a natural cleaner, sort of like injector cleaner. All of the deposits in the tank will be sent to the filter.
Like I said, there is no use arguing as what I am saying is already proven. I am simply just trying to spread the word.
I must have read over that part on my first read through. Do you even know the energy content per volume of straight ethanol? I can assure you it is about 60% of gasoline...but you are correct regarding spark knock.
Quote:
Your vehicle will have the ability to run on straight gas, straight ethanol, or any combination of the two. The most popular combinations are E85 (85% ethanol and 15% gasoline) or your everyday gas (10% ethanol and 90% gasoline). Please remember that the FFI Platinum will automatically sense the gas to ethanol ratio and make all of the adjustments necessary for a seamless FlexFuel experience.
Charles (the haha one) wrote:o you took away the edit button haha no fair haha
What I ment to say is that well everything that goes around the internet about how bad e85 is and how it will eat through anything. This video goes to show that e85 does the exact oppisite it helps keep things clean and doesnt eat away at the rubber.
I'm not sure how it exactly works but your cars computer already has the abillity to sense differnt fuels as it can change your A/F if your running reg old 87 octane or premium 93 octane.
But like I said I will be ordering a kit from that web site if gas heads back up. e85 was at most 2.60 a gal this summer in my area compared to the 3.75 it was for just reg 87 and almost $4 for premium
Charles (the haha one) wrote:haha see like I said I dont know exactly how it works. Its true it may not be the best for an engine but its a step in the right direction. I emailed Ron just to ask a few questions and I will see what he says when he gets back to me.
Ian Brydon wrote:Charles (the haha one) wrote:haha see like I said I dont know exactly how it works. Its true it may not be the best for an engine but its a step in the right direction. I emailed Ron just to ask a few questions and I will see what he says when he gets back to me.
How exactly is it a step in the right direction? A new "wonder fuel" that requires more volume to accomplish the same things that normal fuel does. It burns cleaner, but you burn more of it. How far ahead are you really? It costs the same/volume, but you get less mileage out of that same volume, so it costs you more to use. Have you ever looked into what is involved in producing ethanol fuel? The amount of fuel burned and emissions created in that process pretty well wipes out any benefit to the environment that may have existed. You may be able to run increased timing, but we've had C16 race fuel for years already, so this is nothing new.
Do more research before forming your conclusions. Do you really believe WMD was the reason for the war in Iraq? The parties who fund the research can have the results read however they would like.
Taetsch Z-24 wrote:I'll stick with 110 leaded.
(No, O2's are not an issue for me.)
Chris