Hey guys, I am having one hell of a hard time trying to get this 2003 cavy to run. I am trying to fake a 2 bar MAP in this thing and for the life of me it will not run and I have no clue as to why. The car is a customers car and it's a 2003 cavy with the eco. I installed the Saab turbo setup for him last week and now I am trying to get it to run! I have done 2 and 3 bar fake tunes before with absolutely no issues, but this car is making me want to shoot things.
I need some help or some suggestions as to where to go from here, I have some idea's but I am starting to grasp at straws now and since this is a customers car I would like to get it back to him asap.
Here is what I have done so far. Went through his stock file and changed all the tables that have to be changed for a fake 2/3 bar map (Hi Octane Spark, Low Octane Spark, PE Hi Octane spark, PE Low Octane Spark, Base Idle Spark, IAT spark, ECT Spark, Launch Spark, and MAP min value). I am also using an old style 2 bar MAP sensor with the old pigtail that I wired in color for color (this might be my issue but I am not sure as I can't seem to find a wiring diagram for a 2003 and nothing is turning up when I search this site for it). When you try to start the car it will start and run fine for about 2 seconds and then it falls on it's face and dies. When it first starts the MAP reads fine at about 20KPA but when it starts to die the map comes up into the 40's before it dies. The MAP sensor just sitting at atmospheric pressure reads 54KPA which would be about right on a 2 bar sensor. At first I thought it might be a vacuum leak somewhere but with the old one bar sensor connected the car idles perfectly. As far as the PCM goes I have dug pretty deep into it. I changed the VIN in this car to match Andy's file (same year sunfire that I tuned a 2 and 3 bar setup on) and then uploaded Andy's file to his car. Went through the security learn process and when I fired the car it did the exact same thing.
I used Andy's old 2 bar tune so in therory it should of fired up and ran with no issues since both cars are the exact same years. Now one thing I was able to track down is that Andy's PCM never had the PCM recall in 2004 to be reflashed, the car that I am working on right now had it done. I am now wondering if it was encrypted and some of my changes are not taking effect?
Now here is the strange part of things that is really throwing me for a loop. If you unplug the harness connector from the MAP the car will sit and idle all day long and run pretty good, same happens if you unplug the vacuum from the MAP sensor. When this is done everything on the scanner shows pretty good with the exception of the O2's being very rich (950mv's) which is understandable because with no connection at the MAP it is going to want to add fuel (54KPA on the MAP). Now if I plug either the electrical connector or the vacuum line back in the car dies right away, doesn't even try to stay running. I can keep it running if I play with the throtle but just barely and it runs like a bag of hammers. One thing I did notice though was that when the MAP is connected the 02's readings are not correct. The 02 sits around 451-452 and doesn't move from there yet the wide band is showing 11.6:1 (although it is an innovate wide band and I am not certian that it is accurate (for future reference don't buy this wideband, waste of time compared to the rest on the market)) and you can see that it is running very rich by the black smoke out the tail pipe. You unplug the MAP and O2's return to normal in the scanner. I am now wondering if there is a problem with the way I have the MAP wired into the car. I am wondering if somehow the MAP and new connector are stealing a ground from the O2 sensor which would explain why the O2 readings are not right when you try to connect the new MAP. I have searched everywhere for a wiring diagram for this car and can't find one anywhere, even my shop program doesn't have it.
So there you have it, if anyone has any suggestions at all I am all ears.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edited Friday, July 18, 2008 5:25 AM
Quoth the Raven 'Nevermore
raven@accesswave.ca
Raven Autosports
55 McQuade Lake Cres,
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
(902) 850-3330
10.82@132
Do you have a wideband connected to it currently? If so what are the AFR's on it? The J's use map reading for fuel at idle, so using the 2 bar map sensor is throwing things off. I had this happen on a 99 Z24 we installed the GM charger on. When we hooked up the 2 bar map it was ran like crap until I tuned the fuel. My guess is fuel at idle. It is really idling at one KPA but getting fuel for a different KPA because of the 2 bar map.
FU Tuning
Yeah I do have a wide band and it is showing 11.6 ish when running (with or without the MAP connected so I am really not sure if it is correct or not), but that should still be able to run though. I have seen plenty of cars that will idle at 10:1, granted lots of black smoke but still run. It also doesn't explain why my O2 readings go to hell once the MAP is connected (O2 should be moving constantly and with the black smoke it should be a high number (900+mvs) but it's not, it sits around 450 which to me says there is either something wrong with the sensor or the wiring. This car also won't run at all with the new MAP, not even for 3 seconds. Even with a very rich idle table it still should be able to run. I tried pulling a tone of fuel from the idle and low RPM tables and it did nothing, same result.
Quoth the Raven 'Nevermore
raven@accesswave.ca
Raven Autosports
55 McQuade Lake Cres,
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
(902) 850-3330
10.82@132
1st check the obvious. I had the same situation, Car would start up run and would then go pig rich and idle any adjustments to the table would result in the same problem. Figured it to be the tune and was messin with it all day before I Tracked the problem down to the ground wire on the back of head to the left side of the head i believe that is where it goes. Check to make sure that and other grounds are good unless you didn't touch any on the turbo install.
I had basically all of the same symptoms you've listed above.
I am starting to think it is a wiring issue as well. The thing is that when I pulled it in (turbo was on the car but still had the one bar installed and the stock file) it ran fine, no issues at all. I wired in the new MAP sensor, changed the tune and all the problems started. There is only three wires out of the MAP and as far as I can tell it is wired right. Pin A on the connector is the org/blk wire, Pin B is Ltgr/blk and PIN C is gray. I am kind of thinking a ground issue but I haven't done anything other than wire in the new MAP and make some changes to the PCM. I am still at it now, just tried switching pin A with Pin B at the map connector to make sure but again it does the same thing. And the thing is this car will not Idle...at all!!! If the MAP is connected it starts and the dies right away. It is wired back to the way I had it now so I will keep looking.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edited Friday, July 18, 2008 7:14 AM
Quoth the Raven 'Nevermore
raven@accesswave.ca
Raven Autosports
55 McQuade Lake Cres,
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
(902) 850-3330
10.82@132
if you need me to look anything up let me know i have the GM Service Information. What you had for the map it showed too on SI
JBO since July 30, 2001
I actually have the exact same problem trying to get my 3 bar working with HPtuners, (i know you've heard that before) But yeah, it idles for about 2 seconds then dies. Consistently, but the 1 bar will work fine on the same wires. I wish I could help, but i honestly haven't figured this one out yet. So hopefully the solution will relieve both our troubles, however my car is a 99, so the solution may not be the same. ( I dont know much about eco's) For mine I have to switch the harness to work with the new map sensor, so I use the green GM three prong one. Is it the same deal? What Map sensor do you use?
Quote:
Went through his stock file and changed all the tables that have to be changed for a fake 2/3 bar map (Hi Octane Spark, Low Octane Spark, PE Hi Octane spark, PE Low Octane Spark, Base Idle Spark, IAT spark, ECT Spark, Launch Spark, and MAP min value).
Take a look at the idle VE and low RPM VE tables, most of the ones i've seen are MAP based, and it looks like you skipped over them.
4cyltuner.com - Information Source For 4 Cylinder Tuners
Buy stuff from CarCustoms Ebay! Won't be disappointed!
Shifted wrote:Quote:
Went through his stock file and changed all the tables that have to be changed for a fake 2/3 bar map (Hi Octane Spark, Low Octane Spark, PE Hi Octane spark, PE Low Octane Spark, Base Idle Spark, IAT spark, ECT Spark, Launch Spark, and MAP min value).
Take a look at the idle VE and low RPM VE tables, most of the ones i've seen are MAP based, and it looks like you skipped over them.
If this works I will fly out there and kiss you, lol.
With Andy's car I didn't touch those tables at first, his car was already running very rich so it didn't really matter. I just backed everything down from there but I didn't scale them originally. I did just add 40% to the VE offset and it now idles for about 20 sec with good scan results till it does the samething and then stalls out. I am going to go back through and rescale those VE tables and see what happens. Thanks.
Quoth the Raven 'Nevermore
raven@accesswave.ca
Raven Autosports
55 McQuade Lake Cres,
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
(902) 850-3330
10.82@132
ok I looked back through and there was two tables that do reference the MAP (Idle and coastdown). I rescaled both tables and now it looks like I have a theift issue, lol. I am still using Andy's file and last night when I did the relearn I only had to do it two cycles and it fired up when normally you have to do three. I am doing the relearn procedure now and then I will see what happens.
Quoth the Raven 'Nevermore
raven@accesswave.ca
Raven Autosports
55 McQuade Lake Cres,
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
(902) 850-3330
10.82@132
Well that didn't work out very well, I rescaled those tables and I'm still getting the same results. The only positive thing that I did was two changes ago when I bumped the VE offset uptoo 40% it ran for about 20 sec before dieing out. One thing I didn't mention was that I am still using the stock injectors (going to swap out for larger but they are not here yet). The inj setting are untouched due to this and I can't really see them being an issue as to why the car won't run. Going to keep plugging away at it to see if I can figure this thing out.
Quoth the Raven 'Nevermore
raven@accesswave.ca
Raven Autosports
55 McQuade Lake Cres,
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
(902) 850-3330
10.82@132
I gave Raven a call... couldn't explain this stuff over the interweeb the way I want but he's going to try some things and get back to us.
He DID get the car running with the idle ve table raped at 40% offset so the computer wants fuel.... which leads us in the right direction.
Pretty sure all the info I gave ya will point you in the right direction James! Let us know how it goes!
Just so you all know...
I advised him to:
- Put the idle VE table to stock.. for some reason it does NOT read in 2 bar when faked.
- Undo the 40% offset on the VE tables and put it back to stock.
- Raise the injector constant size around 40-44% and go from there... for some reason the constant needs to go up. Anybody that wonders why you need to do this: view the Stock LD9 table and the GMSC table. Injector constant N/A is 2.0250 and the new 2 bar tune with BIGGER injectors (Constant should go DOWN) is 2.6xxxx.... This didn't make sense to me for a long time until I tried a fake 2 bar.
- The car is hesitating and the car is going heavily lean on the wideband when he blips the throttle right now... I told him to view his faked 2 bar low RPM timing tables... I'm dead sure that in the faking of the 2 bar it's overlooked that the timing down low at idle is affected by squishing the chart. Commanding 5 degrees of timing at 1000rpm @ 30 kpa isn't going to give anybody good throttle response! lol
- Be sure to copy all modified tables to the alcohol tables. For some reason those stupid tables are referenced! So don't forget to change them to match everything else.
I hope that helps anybody that tries this one day.
I'm no expert / professional tuner I just went through all of these same issues when I faked my 2 bar a month ago. Getting the car running is actually the hardest part, surprisingly.
I haven't been able to work on mine due to the car being down... but I hope to get back at it after the bash. (For those of you who are waiting on my LD9 fake)
-Chris-
-Sweetness-
-Turbocharged-
Slowly but surely may some day win this race...
Well I tried some of what you said but I am still having no luck..it is now commanding 3 degrees of timing at idle which I don't under stand because if you look at my timing tables you can see it should be around 20 degrees. I have another customer in the bay now that I have to do an exhaust on but after that I will be getting back to this. I think I am going to start over with his stock file and go from there, I have changed the PCM so much now that I am starting to doubt my changes. I will let you know how I make out.
For anyone interested and wants to see the file itself let me know...I will email it to you since I can't post them up here.
Quoth the Raven 'Nevermore
raven@accesswave.ca
Raven Autosports
55 McQuade Lake Cres,
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
(902) 850-3330
10.82@132
Damnit I wish I had HPT here I'd get a look at it for you. Heck I wish I had even my fake 2 bar hpt file here for you to get a look at.
3 degrees of timing at idle is going to stop the car from running.... take a look at your base tables, and at your base idle table.... you're commanding that somewhere in the PCM...
I sent you an email anyhow... like I said let us know as you move along I'm sure we can help you get it up and running. I wish you were closer I'd stop by and work on it with ya.
-Chris-
-Sweetness-
-Turbocharged-
Slowly but surely may some day win this race...
I dont have HPT with me at the current moment, but I wanna say need to go to your idle base spark modifiers and check those... Can't think of the exact table name off the top of my head but i believe it may be in the spark retard section....
P&P Tuning
420.5whp / 359.8wtq
I haven't disabled closed loop for the fact that it needs all the help it can get right now. Originally when I did it I did put it into open loop but it had the same result. I then put it back in closed loop and haven't changed it since. I was wondering about the inj constant multi as well, I would be able to have a larger effect on the file by changing them. I have done pretty much everything mentioned above and I am still having the same issues, granted now it runs fine for about 15 sec before it falls on it's face, good timing down low but you hit the gas and it drops...everything in the tables is saying it should be around 17-18 but the reality of it is different. I am going to start from the original file now and go from there, I have made so many changes now I can't be sure anymore. I will start from scratch and let you guys know how it turns out.
Quoth the Raven 'Nevermore
raven@accesswave.ca
Raven Autosports
55 McQuade Lake Cres,
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
(902) 850-3330
10.82@132
raven wrote:I haven't disabled closed loop for the fact that it needs all the help it can get right now. Originally when I did it I did put it into open loop but it had the same result. I then put it back in closed loop and haven't changed it since. I was wondering about the inj constant multi as well, I would be able to have a larger effect on the file by changing them. I have done pretty much everything mentioned above and I am still having the same issues, granted now it runs fine for about 15 sec before it falls on it's face, good timing down low but you hit the gas and it drops...everything in the tables is saying it should be around 17-18 but the reality of it is different. I am going to start from the original file now and go from there, I have made so many changes now I can't be sure anymore. I will start from scratch and let you guys know how it turns out.
I would load the stock file back on and see what happens. Reason I asked about closed loop, is it sounds like it runs fine for a few until some kind of change (like going into closed loop). So I was thinking get it from going to closed loop so it runs off the tables.
Were you referring to the IPW vs Vac multi field?
This sounds soo much like the issue I had with the 99 Z24. Running the 2 bar map killed timing resolution on the low end. Since it was a Gm charger we decided to stay with a 1 bar map to keep more resolution in the lower end. If it is not going to see more than 10 psi I would do the same, more than 10 psi you really need the 2 bar to get more resolution in the higher boost levels.
FU Tuning
James man....If u need my laptop and files gimme a call i can be in the city in 40 min....with coffee's ,,,lol
491whp, 393wtq
11.93@ 127mph
Raven Autosports (902)850-3330
John Higgins wrote:raven wrote:I haven't disabled closed loop for the fact that it needs all the help it can get right now. Originally when I did it I did put it into open loop but it had the same result. I then put it back in closed loop and haven't changed it since. I was wondering about the inj constant multi as well, I would be able to have a larger effect on the file by changing them. I have done pretty much everything mentioned above and I am still having the same issues, granted now it runs fine for about 15 sec before it falls on it's face, good timing down low but you hit the gas and it drops...everything in the tables is saying it should be around 17-18 but the reality of it is different. I am going to start from the original file now and go from there, I have made so many changes now I can't be sure anymore. I will start from scratch and let you guys know how it turns out.
I would load the stock file back on and see what happens. Reason I asked about closed loop, is it sounds like it runs fine for a few until some kind of change (like going into closed loop). So I was thinking get it from going to closed loop so it runs off the tables.
Were you referring to the IPW vs Vac multi field?
This sounds soo much like the issue I had with the 99 Z24. Running the 2 bar map killed timing resolution on the low end. Since it was a Gm charger we decided to stay with a 1 bar map to keep more resolution in the lower end. If it is not going to see more than 10 psi I would do the same, more than 10 psi you really need the 2 bar to get more resolution in the higher boost levels.
Yeah thats exactly how it sounds..like something in the computer (closed loop) is referencing some other tables and it's dieing. I am convinced that there are a lot of tables that are not showing in HPT. I know with the software I use for my 3800 I have triple the tables available to me. I will throw it into open loop next time around and see what happens. Also I was referring to the IPW Vs Vac...from my understanding it is a multiplier of the base fueling based off MAP with lower numbers richening the mixture. Since it is a multiplier I should be able to get better results quicker using this...would you agree?
How safe would it really be though to run into boost and just be using the last cell in the tables for fueling? From my understanding the one bar sensor will not see boost and you are just going to run off the end of the table, using the last cell for everything above 100kpa. Is there enough lee way to be able to run off that last cell?
Quoth the Raven 'Nevermore
raven@accesswave.ca
Raven Autosports
55 McQuade Lake Cres,
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
(902) 850-3330
10.82@132
UNDREDAWG...? wrote:James man....If u need my laptop and files gimme a call i can be in the city in 40 min....with coffee's ,,,lol
lol...if you need an excuse to come up to the city then by all means come on up. Double Double please.
Quoth the Raven 'Nevermore
raven@accesswave.ca
Raven Autosports
55 McQuade Lake Cres,
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
(902) 850-3330
10.82@132
Before I go back to the stock table I decided to throw it into open loop and stil the same results....15 sec and then dead. Going back to the stock file now, going to redo the 2 bar maps.
Quoth the Raven 'Nevermore
raven@accesswave.ca
Raven Autosports
55 McQuade Lake Cres,
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
(902) 850-3330
10.82@132
Well I think I am getting somewhere now. I started with the stock table and redid the tables for the 2 bar leaving the stock idle table alone. I then went back through the timing tables and changed the 20 and 30 KPA colums down to 3600 RPM back to the N/A numbers. I also comprimised on the base idle table and added half of the original figure back in. From there I set the injector constant to .22780 and brought the idle up to 1000. The car now starts but it is rough, after about 30 sec or so it actually calms down and runs fairly well, idles at 1000 and MAP is showing 20 - 24kpa. The ignition is still very low (8-12 advance) at idle and it does hesitate when I rev it but I can hold a steady rpm and the timing is good (25-35) from 2500rpm to 3500rpm and sounds good. Going to keep going with this and see what I can do.....at least now it actually runs
Quoth the Raven 'Nevermore
raven@accesswave.ca
Raven Autosports
55 McQuade Lake Cres,
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
(902) 850-3330
10.82@132
Brought the injector constant up to .25810 (45% increase) and the car is now starting nicely, still low ignition readings (10-12 advance) but idles steady and a little on the rich side of things. Going to see if I can bring the idle timing up a little bit more and then on to getting the wide band to show me the proper signal since it never moves off 11.62:1 lol. I will just keep this thread going from start to finnish. I will have this car on the dyno one week from Wednesday and I am very interested to see what this setup can do on a stock eco.
Quoth the Raven 'Nevermore
raven@accesswave.ca
Raven Autosports
55 McQuade Lake Cres,
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
(902) 850-3330
10.82@132