THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf??? - Other Cars Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Tuesday, July 12, 2005 7:53 AM

Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Tuesday, July 12, 2005 8:10 AM





pirates kick ninja asses, f00
Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Tuesday, July 12, 2005 8:36 AM
WHAT IN GODS NAME IS THAT!!!

A BEAUTIFUL CAR RUINED!!!!



Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Tuesday, July 12, 2005 8:46 AM
Damn I want to put wings on it and fly it !



Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Tuesday, July 12, 2005 9:11 AM
As I look through the pics the car reminds me more and more of that Delorian from Back to the Future, hahaha.



Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Tuesday, July 12, 2005 9:17 AM
wow

Have a good one,
Justin


Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Tuesday, July 12, 2005 12:51 PM
It looks like that same driveway and house, that the guy was selling the thrust powered red Dakota.

Anyone remember that one?






Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Tuesday, July 12, 2005 5:32 PM
YEah but does it have NAWS


Do I really need a signature?
Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Tuesday, July 12, 2005 6:20 PM
It doesnt need NAWS, its thrust powered!

GOSH!!!



Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Tuesday, July 12, 2005 6:24 PM
holy crap.
I like how he talks about how its not a big deal about getting rid of it.
Its hard to believe this is real.





How many steps to heaven, Doc?
...Ah, metaphysics.
Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Tuesday, July 12, 2005 7:43 PM
Suddenly I got the urge to watch back to the future. I wonder if that is on DVD for cheap...

Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Tuesday, July 12, 2005 8:16 PM
No wonder it isn't fast for a jet car. The engines are turboshaft designs for a helecopter. Meaning they were not designed for high thrust. If he hooked up an adequate trasmission system to them he would have 2 x 800 HP and could get much more speed out of it. It's either BS or just a really crappy design. Here's what GE has to say about the T58 turbine.

"The T58 turboshaft engine -- the engine that would power the United States' first jet helicopter, the engine that would power the Sikorsky Sea King helicopter that recovered the Apollo astronauts, and the engine that still powers Marine One, the helicopter of the U.S. president since the Kennedy administration -- was born in 1953 with the award of a $3 million contract from the U.S. Navy. Under the terms of the contract, GE was to develop the XT-58 "baby gas turbine" that the company had proposed as a powerplant for helicopters. The engine was to weigh 400 pounds and was to produce 800 shaft horsepower (shp)."

PAX
Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Tuesday, July 12, 2005 8:45 PM
DAMN YOU HAHAHAHA!!! I was going to make a funny about that... (It would have gone: when did the USN start hemorraging Sea Kings??)


It's a remarkably good photochop, nonetheless.


<a href="http://www.canada.ca"><img src="http://img63.exs.cx/img63/6743/ca.gif" alt="Canada.ca" border="0"></a> <a href="http://www.truthout.org">All the News that's not fit to broadcast at CNN, FOX, NBC, ABC or CBS</a>
<img src="http://img133.echo.cx/img133/1871/silywalk7pi.jpg">
"Never offend people with style when you can offend them with substance."
--Sam Brown
Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Wednesday, July 13, 2005 6:16 PM
lol hes no good at photoshop

i like how the different angles dont match, ie the top and side



happy happy joy joy

Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Thursday, July 14, 2005 2:09 PM
At first I thought photoshop but its real hard to tell because all of the pics stay pretty consistant aside from the first odd one.



Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Thursday, July 14, 2005 6:15 PM
it has t tops, sweet.


-Borsty
Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Friday, July 15, 2005 4:49 AM
Sorry to spoil your joke GAM.. It's just that axial flow engines are my favourite. No recipricating mass.. It just makes more sense to me.

PAX
Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Saturday, July 16, 2005 9:59 PM
nobody is that good a ps. that has got to be real.

-Brandon

Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Sunday, July 17, 2005 6:10 AM
Just needs to black, then it could be the next batmobile.



YEAH I WENT PREMIUM. SO BITE ME!
Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Sunday, July 17, 2005 8:21 AM
redecocav wrote:nobody is that good a ps. that has got to be real.


Tons of graphic artists are better than that at PS. Ever read National geographic? I bet you can't tell what's real from what's not. They do small things to make their photos more interesting, like there photo essay of the Titanic, it had tropical fish in the picture.. There are no tropical fish in the north atlantic, but it made for a nice layout. Ad materials are almost always chopped, etc etc etc.. It's everywhere.

On top of that, those are shaft turbines designed for helecopter use, not thrust turbines. They would produce very little thrust, and anyone using them would hook them up to a trasmission and extract the nearly 1600 HP available. Notice the speeds are low for a jet car? That's cause it's not a jet car.

PAX
Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Tuesday, July 19, 2005 8:18 AM
" based upon some of the questions I have had asked, be prepared to sign a long liability waiver."

hahahaha




Anything worth doing is worth doing right. -Hunter S. Thompson


Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:00 AM
Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:20 AM
Sweet Vids! I was thinking it looked real to begin with. Only other thing I can think of is that someone had the same car and tried to do a paintshop rep of it, by why go through the bother and then spend money posting on ebay?





Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Monday, July 25, 2005 5:02 PM
I sent that ebay auction to my brother a few weeks ago because I thought he would think it was cool. Then today he sends me a Pix Message...



I guess his friend bought it! It is a local company Toy Junkies


<img src="http://www.j-body.org/registry/batman/personal_pic.gif">
Re: THRUST POWERED MR2?????wtf???
Monday, July 25, 2005 5:03 PM
Well, all I can say is, those are the wrong turbines for the job.. He must have gotten them cheap.. On top of that, if he used a transmission, he'd have 1600HP on tap.. Seems pretty dumb to me.

PAX
Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search