The first Modular powered 05 mustang went in the tens.
The guy bought an 2005 Mustang and 40 days later he had it ready.
First run pulled off a 10.87@133... at the end of the day his best run was 10.07@135
here is the article
http://www.mustangweekly.com/2005/april/fo.../forty-lead.asp
IHO Mustangs suck a fat one so I didn't bother reading the article have no idea if its gays so doen't bitch if it is.... I just leached this off another forum
link doesn't work...... @!#$ mustangs, @!#$ them in there stupid asses
hahahaha yea i agree, i hate them also
1989 Pontiac Sunbird GT.. soon to be a 13 second car
I used to think I hated them but then I realized I just hate the fox body because every dousche bag that drives one thinks it's the fastest thing on 4 wheels. 3rd gen Camaro owners are often the same way though.
So they don't suckass as bad as the last generation in regards to mod potential? (excluding 03+ cobra of course).
Darkstars wrote:link doesn't work...... @!#$ mustangs, @!#$ them in there stupid asses
What exactly do you hate?
OHC V-8's, loads of aftermarket. Options for supercharged goodness, 600+rwhp on stock internals for Cobra's. New styling for 05, and nicer interiors...
IMO you are a moron. It must be the plastic interior and ultra high performance of the cavalier that wins you over, right?
....remember, I owned a cavalier too.....a 14second 2.2l ohv no less, and I see NO reason to hate mustangs. You may hate the amount you see on the roads but there is a reason they are so popular.
2004 WR Blue/silver STi
that link doesnt work either
Luke wrote:Darkstars wrote:link doesn't work...... @!#$ mustangs, @!#$ them in there stupid asses
What exactly do you hate?
OHC V-8's, loads of aftermarket. Options for supercharged goodness, 600+rwhp on stock internals for Cobra's. New styling for 05, and nicer interiors...
IMO you are a moron. It must be the plastic interior and ultra high performance of the cavalier that wins you over, right?
....remember, I owned a cavalier too.....a 14second 2.2l ohv no less, and I see NO reason to hate mustangs. You may hate the amount you see on the roads but there is a reason they are so popular.
uhm
no im more of a camaro, gto, charger, cuda, basically anything but ford cars
they had some decent things in the day
but the day is over
anyway thats a fast run
lol what exactly is there to like lol. a car that needs a supercharger to break 300+hp. a car that needs such close ratio gearing in order to make it keep up with the compition, which gives it crappy gas mileage. give me an ls1 and add a few goodies to get it around 550whp on stock internals it will blow away the punie ponie. mustangs are crap, engines are crap, everything about mustangs, are crap. only good mustang was in the 60's and thats it.
Yes i'm a Die Hard Camaro Fan.
Visit
High Rev Motorsports for all your High Performance needs.
Visit
RSM Racing for j-body superchargers, throttle bodies, and much more.
Visit
Cobalt SS.Net and sign up to get the latest info on the cobalt and all other delta platform cars
theL61 wrote:Luke wrote:Darkstars wrote:link doesn't work...... @!#$ mustangs, @!#$ them in there stupid asses
What exactly do you hate?
OHC V-8's, loads of aftermarket. Options for supercharged goodness, 600+rwhp on stock internals for Cobra's. New styling for 05, and nicer interiors...
IMO you are a moron. It must be the plastic interior and ultra high performance of the cavalier that wins you over, right?
....remember, I owned a cavalier too.....a 14second 2.2l ohv no less, and I see NO reason to hate mustangs. You may hate the amount you see on the roads but there is a reason they are so popular.
uhm
no im more of a camaro, gto, charger, cuda, basically anything but ford cars
they had some decent things in the day
I'm with him.. Ford is not my cup of tea, never been a ford fan, never will be a ford fan, I care how nice and how much aftermarket there is I don't like Ford, they are as bad as VW IMO. and comaping anything to a cavalier isn't exactly a selling point to brag about, there has never been a ford a found visually apealing and the fact that the first mustang was a P.O.S. ford Falcon with a new body killed it for my with the mustang since day one, when your new sports car is a family car with a new shell you don't get respect from me. If you like ford/mustangs congratulations, I don't... deal with it
well i agree you have a right to your opinion, but id like to know how you think ford is as bad as vw.....
gentlemen ... lets not get into this debate again ... camaro vs mustang or whatever the local gm vs ford debate is. There is + and -'s to both. You take the good you take the bad and there you have ... the car that you want more.
dan
BLAH!!
I hate that "Ford has to supercharge their car to get 300+ hp" arguement. The 03+ cobras are designed for boost. Low compression ratio, iron block, forged internals. They didn't take a N/A engine and slap on a S/C, they designed a engine that has guys hitting mid 9's -10's w/out cracking off the valvecover. Mod for mod, $$ for $$ they'll hand it to an LS1 anyday. There both a hell of an engine, its just hard to argue that one "sucks".
^^
actually the ls1 sucks because its na
whilest the whatever the designation for the cobra engine is blows due to a blower
fords blow, each production year of the f car and the mustang were around the f bodys handed the mustangs their asses, year for year. so 03 cobras dont count.
-Borsty
ChrisIDV wrote:I used to think I hated them but then I realized I just hate the fox body because every dousche bag that drives one thinks it's the fastest thing on 4 wheels. 3rd gen Camaro owners are often the same way though.
Yeah, all of us "douche bag" Fox owners think we are the fastest out there
I could say the same of every kid I have ever seen in a J-body who thinks 15's are fast. It's not good to generalize
Borsty wrote:fords blow, each production year of the f car and the mustang were around the f bodys handed the mustangs their asses, year for year. so 03 cobras dont count.
Wrong skippy. The 5.0 LX's from 1987-1991 was faster than the F-body heads up. In 1991 and 1992 it was about equal. Shall we go back to the 427, 428 and 429 cars? Shall we talk about the supercharged Shelby? Shall we talk of the 96-97 Cobra that was as fast or faster than the LT-1 in the right hands stock? The 99 and '01 Cobra was right there with the LS-1 as well as the Mach 1 with a 5spd. Learn something aobut them before opening your mouth and spewing nonsense.
Darkstars wrote:theL61 wrote:Luke wrote:Darkstars wrote:link doesn't work...... @!#$ mustangs, @!#$ them in there stupid asses
What exactly do you hate?
OHC V-8's, loads of aftermarket. Options for supercharged goodness, 600+rwhp on stock internals for Cobra's. New styling for 05, and nicer interiors...
IMO you are a moron. It must be the plastic interior and ultra high performance of the cavalier that wins you over, right?
....remember, I owned a cavalier too.....a 14second 2.2l ohv no less, and I see NO reason to hate mustangs. You may hate the amount you see on the roads but there is a reason they are so popular.
uhm
no im more of a camaro, gto, charger, cuda, basically anything but ford cars
they had some decent things in the day
I'm with him.. Ford is not my cup of tea, never been a ford fan, never will be a ford fan, I care how nice and how much aftermarket there is I don't like Ford, they are as bad as VW IMO. and comaping anything to a cavalier isn't exactly a selling point to brag about, there has never been a ford a found visually apealing and the fact that the first mustang was a P.O.S. ford Falcon with a new body killed it for my with the mustang since day one, when your new sports car is a family car with a new shell you don't get respect from me. If you like ford/mustangs congratulations, I don't... deal with it
^^^^^^^^^^agreed
not my cup of tea eaither
RIP JESSE GERARD.....Youll always be in my thoughts and prayers...
Eddie wrote:lol what exactly is there to like lol. a car that needs a supercharger to break 300+hp. a car that needs such close ratio gearing in order to make it keep up with the compition, which gives it crappy gas mileage. give me an ls1 and add a few goodies to get it around 550whp on stock internals it will blow away the punie ponie. mustangs are crap, engines are crap, everything about mustangs, are crap. only good mustang was in the 60's and thats it.
Yes i'm a Die Hard Camaro Fan.
LS-1 with it's hollow pushrods, glass internals and crappy 10 bolt. We have a club member with a twn turbo LS-1 putting 600 HP to the wheels, he is running a Ford 9 inch, Forged internals, an Incon twin turbo kit and a whole bunch of bolt ons and fuel system upgrades. Those "few goodies" cost quite a bit of money. And as far as your other statement goes, horsesh!t. I guess the 305 hp Cobra, the 320 hp Cobra, the 385 hp Cobra R, the 400 hp 5.0 modular available in Ford's catalog and the 300 hp GT do not count, right? There are new GT's with just a power tune putting 300 to the wheels. I have owned over 30 G.M. vehicles over the years including 3 F-bodies and I hate to see people so brand loyal that they look like idiots.
scott9050 wrote:Borsty wrote:fords blow, each production year of the f car and the mustang were around the f bodys handed the mustangs their asses, year for year. so 03 cobras dont count.
Wrong skippy. The 5.0 LX's from 1987-1991 was faster than the F-body heads up. In 1991 and 1992 it was about equal. Shall we go back to the 427, 428 and 429 cars? Shall we talk about the supercharged Shelby? Shall we talk of the 96-97 Cobra that was as fast or faster than the LT-1 in the right hands stock? The 99 and '01 Cobra was right there with the LS-1 as well as the Mach 1 with a 5spd. Learn something aobut them before opening your mouth and spewing nonsense.
nope sorry.
and your wrong. oh so wrong.
-Borsty
Borsty wrote:scott9050 wrote:Borsty wrote:fords blow, each production year of the f car and the mustang were around the f bodys handed the mustangs their asses, year for year. so 03 cobras dont count.
Wrong skippy. The 5.0 LX's from 1987-1991 was faster than the F-body heads up. In 1991 and 1992 it was about equal. Shall we go back to the 427, 428 and 429 cars? Shall we talk about the supercharged Shelby? Shall we talk of the 96-97 Cobra that was as fast or faster than the LT-1 in the right hands stock? The 99 and '01 Cobra was right there with the LS-1 as well as the Mach 1 with a 5spd. Learn something aobut them before opening your mouth and spewing nonsense.
nope sorry.
and your wrong. oh so wrong.
Anything to back yourself up? I have evidence to back myself up, not to mention I was driving these cars while you were still in pampers. I've been racing at the track since you were 3. Again, typical of someone uneducated of what both cars were capable of at a given time.
