bleh ford
bleh their lack of talant
s/c on this
s/c on that
gm and dodge have 500hp n/a engines why cant ford??
Who cares if its S/C or not really? Its going to be badass throw a pulley and a tune on it and watch out!
And its going to be in a Lightning also (that engine)? That will be sick.
You go ahead and go buy a dodge or GM. While your wasting away your cash on bolt ons I will throw on a pulley and a chip/tune (probably less then 200-300$) and be kicking some serious ass.
I hope ALL of the SVT line up comes with S/C stock! Saves me the trouble of having to add one later.
95 Cobra
Check out my site
A GM 6.6L Duramax Turbo Diesel V8 with a Banks Six-Gun Bundle puts out 434hp and 908 lb-ft torque. Might not be 500hp, but 908 tq certainly puts a quick end to that pos ford truck. Oh and the Silverado/Sierra looks better to boot.
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about
the former." - Albert Einstein
Labora wrote:Who cares if its S/C or not really? Its going to be badass throw a pulley and a tune on it and watch out!
And its going to be in a Lightning also (that engine)? That will be sick.
You go ahead and go buy a dodge or GM. While your wasting away your cash on bolt ons I will throw on a pulley and a chip/tune (probably less then 200-300$) and be kicking some serious ass. I hope ALL of the SVT line up comes with S/C stock! Saves me the trouble of having to add one later.
I won't need to waste my money on bolt-ons because when you're cranking up the boost and blow your motor to pieces, I can cruise down the road knowing that I have a RELIABLE amount of 500 HP N/A under the hood.... with two less cylinders mind you.
SVT is good, but 'good" doesn't cut it anymore.
MiKeDiRnTRuLeZ wrote:Labora wrote:Who cares if its S/C or not really? Its going to be badass throw a pulley and a tune on it and watch out!
And its going to be in a Lightning also (that engine)? That will be sick.
You go ahead and go buy a dodge or GM. While your wasting away your cash on bolt ons I will throw on a pulley and a chip/tune (probably less then 200-300$) and be kicking some serious ass. I hope ALL of the SVT line up comes with S/C stock! Saves me the trouble of having to add one later.
I won't need to waste my money on bolt-ons because when you're cranking up the boost and blow your motor to pieces, I can cruise down the road knowing that I have a RELIABLE amount of 500 HP N/A under the hood.... with two less cylinders mind you.
SVT is good, but 'good" doesn't cut it anymore.
That would be true if these engines weren't build very strong with boost in mind from the factory. The old Cobra motor for example 03-04 people are bolting on KB 2.2 blowers to a stock bottom end and running 9's, 10's! The new Cobra 05 motor is a de tuned Ford GT engine for Christ sake! The Lightning’s old engine in the 2nd gen L was also really good about taking extra boost. (people where over spinning the blower before hurting the motor) These engines are set up for it so they can handle the boost very well why wouldn't this thing?
95 Cobra
Check out my site
Dave wrote:A GM 6.6L Duramax Turbo Diesel V8 with a Banks Six-Gun Bundle puts out 434hp and 908 lb-ft torque. Might not be 500hp, but 908 tq certainly puts a quick end to that pos ford truck. Oh and the Silverado/Sierra looks better to boot.
That's when a Ford 6.0 steps up to the plate and owns it with a SCT tune and some intake and exhaust work.
O noes!
ummm thats fake people lol it was an april fools thing, that truck was insane though, even though it was a photoshop!
yea, notice the april 1st date, its definitly a photoshop. You guys all fell for it.
Cobra = S/C V8
Ford GT = V10
How is that the same engine?
Still would take a Trailblazer SS over that ugly thing.
Real or not, SVT was going to be limited to 5 cars. I don't think they would waste there money on that thing. SVT Sport Track looks light years better than that thing anyway.
<img src="http://www.j-body.org/registry/americanred/deplysig.gif">
DrPaul84 wrote:ummm thats fake people lol it was an april fools thing, that truck was insane though, even though it was a photoshop!
hehe, i would have fallen for it. I was just thinking to myself...."why the @!#$ would anyone name their car a tsunami right now?"
<img src="http://img53.exs.cx/img53/3803/sig21ps.jpg" width="388" height="197" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us" />
I read the article and said
. I never heard this. But oh well.
Then read all the comments then DrPaul84 comment. I was
too funny. Everybody got owned.
Dave, how did it feel?
Good thing though this thing is not coming out. I smell 3 gallons per mile fuel efficiency and thats not what we need now.
>>>For Sale? Clicky!<<<
-----The orginal Mr.Goodwrench on the JBO since 11/99-----
Oh, my mistake. Wow, what a disapointment. I like Fords Labora, it's just that Tsunami truck just is ugly IMO. A F150 with that engine would be so much better.
<img src="http://www.j-body.org/registry/americanred/deplysig.gif">
i hate all fords
wikkymaster <<-
check out my blogs!
Gov't Auto Auction
How I Stopped Smoking
Easy online cash
UNLIMITED streaming online movies
thats cause your a haterrrr
ghey
maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow....... but some day
stock gt wrote:ghey
waaa we need s/cs to compete
theL61 wrote:stock gt wrote:ghey
waaa we need s/cs to compete
meh youre entitled to your opinion
whether its wrong or not
hasnt there been a vehicle named tsunami by a competitive brand....
Not unintentionally accelerating since 2009!!!!
i dont think
there was typhoon and cyclone
