Quote:
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- By next year about 80% of the vehicles Korean automaker Hyundai sells in the United States will be built here, the CEO of the automaker's U.S. arm told CNNMoney.
That percentage would likely put Hyundai at the top of the "Made in the USA" rankings among all automakers operating in the U.S., including Ford, Chrysler and General Motors.
Hyundai has been on a tear lately. The 2011 Sonata earned a top safety rating earlier this month, its vehicles have been getting rave reviews and its U.S. sales are booming.
Hyundai was one of the very few automakers to manage a sales increase in 2009, and last month they were up again by nearly half from the year before.
Considering its fast-moving success in the American market, CNNMoney asked Hyundai Motor America chief John Krafcik if he feared a "buy American" backlash.
Krafcik pointed out that Hyundai plans to move production of its popular Elantra from Korea to the automaker's Montgomery, Ala., plant later this year.
"I'm going to build my three best selling cars in the U.S.," Krafcik said. "Ford builds its best selling car in Mexico."
Test your knowledge: Which car is more American?
The Elantra is Hyundai's second most popular model. The Hyundai Sonata mid-sized sedan, Hyundai's biggest seller, and the Santa Fe SUV, which together make up half of Hyundai's U.S. sales, are already built here.
Ford Motor Co. builds the Fusion mid-sized sedan in Mexico. Ford was not able to say what percentage of the cars it sells in the U.S. are built here.
Popular Ford models, such as the Edge SUV and the Fiesta sub-compact, are built in Mexico and Canada. Even though the top sellers are built elsewhere, the bulk of Ford cars sold in the U.S. are built here. Still, they tally up to less than 80%.
Ford's not terribly bothered by the comparison, though.
"I think we're encouraged that, overall, American manufacturing is competitive," said Ford spokesman John Stoll.
Ford has also "in-sourced" a number of manufacturing jobs recently, bringing thousands of jobs back to the U.S. as it works with the United Autoworkers Union to make its older plants more competitive, he said.
Chrysler also didn't provide an exact figure, but some of Chrysler's most popular models, including its minivans and large sedans such as the Chrysler 300 and Dodge Charger, are built in Canada. That would put their U.S. production below 80%.
General Motors said between 60% and 70% of the cars it sells in the U.S. are assembled here.
Automakers generally don't break out the percentage of cars they sell that are built in the U.S. because, with free trade agreements, cars built in Canada, Mexico and the U.S. are counted together as "North American production."
Playing with numbers. Although Hyundai's 80% goal sounds impressive, the actual number of vehicles it builds domestically pales in comparison to major U.S. automakers.
For example: If GM only built about 66% of the vehicles it sold in the U.S. domestically in 2009 that would mean that GM would have more than tripled the 400,000 cars Hyundai expects to build in the U.S. next year.
Also, production figures like these deal only with "final assembly." In the case of Chrysler, for instance, engines and transmissions for many of the cars it assembles in Canada are built in U.S. factories and shipped north. With most major automakers, various components and parts move back and forth among Canada, Mexico and the United States, making it difficult to point to one place where a car is "built."
Analysts at J.D. Power and Associates don't quite share Krafcik's expectations for U.S. production.
"I don't have it at 80%," said J.D. Power analyst Jeff Schuster. "I have it closer to 70%."
Making Krafcik's "80%" prediction come true would require a big increase in Elantra and Santa Fe sales, similar to the boost that Sonata sales got after that model's recent redesign.
Schuster says sales of the Elantra and Santa Fe should rise significantly with their coming redesigns. The question is: By how much?
It's not about PR, it's about the dollar. Krafcik boasted of Hyundai's commitment to local market production. While it may offer some public relations benefit, that isn't the main reason for such a move, said auto analyst Todd Turner of Car Concepts.
"This corporation doesn't really make decisions based on PR," he said.
For foreign automakers, making cars in the U.S. provides two big benefits. For one, it protects them against changes in the value of their own currency relative to the dollar. Paying to build cars in South Korean Won then selling them in U.S. dollars can be difficult if the dollar loses value against the Won.
Second, it makes it easier to adjust to rapid shifts in consumer demands. If U.S. gas prices shoot up and car buyers start demanding more Elantra's and fewer Sonatas, production can be shifted and deliveries to dealers can start almost immediately. Not so when factories are an ocean away.
FstCavZ24 wrote:Something to ponder: Companies with unfortunate heavy ties to the UAW move production out of the US. Companies with no ties to the UAW, and unions, build brand production facilities in the US.
FstCavZ24 wrote:Something to ponder: Companies with unfortunate heavy ties to the UAW move production out of the US. Companies with no ties to the UAW, and unions, build brand production facilities in the US.
J,wRight wrote:Can we please not confuse assemble and Built?
Sure the cars are put together here, but were are the parts coming from? Seeing how assembly accounts for what? maybe 7% of the total cost of the vehicle, I don't see the big deal.
Ford may have moved assembly to south for cost reasons, but majority of the parts are still made in the US. and thats were all the cost is.
Rabbit(AKA RedAssassin) wrote:Providing jobs for American's during a hard time is a huge deal. Just here on the JBO look at all the people having a hard time finding a job. When they assemble the vehicle in the U.S. think of all the jobs that opens up. Sure, the profit still goes back to Korea. Thats making the rich even more rich. What the average working man like most of us benefits from the most though is the jobs it creates. More vehicles being assembled in the U.S. means more jobs here and more vehicles sold here. More vehicles sold here also creates more jobs for people selling the cars. Much is to be gained from it. The profit of the vehicle going back to where ever it may be is not even half of it.
Bill Hahn Jr. wrote:While it's nice to provide American jobs (which is the least they can do if they are selling cars to Americans!), doing so does not remove the sting of knowing that the beneficiaries of the Hyundai's profits are not Americans. Hyundai's profits go back to Korea, to their primarily Korean shareholders and to the Korean government in the form of corporate taxes.
Myself, I'd prefer those Americans were buying American cars built by Americans, whereby the profit goes to American corporations, shareholders, and the American government. But that's just me. Same amount of jobs, just more of the money staying in America.
Bill Hahn Jr. wrote:While it's nice to provide American jobs (which is the least they can do if they are selling cars to Americans!), doing so does not remove the sting of knowing that the beneficiaries of the Hyundai's profits are not Americans. Hyundai's profits go back to Korea, to their primarily Korean shareholders and to the Korean government in the form of corporate taxes.
Myself, I'd prefer those Americans were buying American cars built by Americans, whereby the profit goes to American corporations, shareholders, and the American government. But that's just me. Same amount of jobs, just more of the money staying in America.
Jookycola wrote:A small revelation for me last night...The Mustang GT is proof that Domestic automakers can do it right.
BlackEco wrote:American Corporation!?
Are you joking? You seriously think that corporations that large give two @!#$s about America? The only time they care about America is when they are getting bailed out. If you can buy stock in them they are International corporations. Let's not kid ourselves here, in a free global market there's no room for nationalism to exist within a corporation.
GTmatters wrote:It's jobs in the US where jobs are needed.
Jookycola wrote:I believe in freedom. It's what makes this country the best place on earth to live. We are free to live our lives and make our own decisions. I also believe in freedom of choice and competition. We all work hard for what we have so we should be able to buy whatever we want.
Detroit pissed on the consumer with poor product and even worse customer service. That left door wide open for imports to welcome people to their products. They did this to themselves. The products may be great now but now they screwed themselves and have to convince people they are better. But if a Korean car maker can prove they are more American that's a poor showing for domestic companies trying to wave the u.s. flag and guilt.
Bill Hahn Jr. wrote:Jookycola wrote:I believe in freedom. It's what makes this country the best place on earth to live. We are free to live our lives and make our own decisions. I also believe in freedom of choice and competition. We all work hard for what we have so we should be able to buy whatever we want.
Detroit pissed on the consumer with poor product and even worse customer service. That left door wide open for imports to welcome people to their products. They did this to themselves. The products may be great now but now they screwed themselves and have to convince people they are better. But if a Korean car maker can prove they are more American that's a poor showing for domestic companies trying to wave the u.s. flag and guilt.
I also believe in freedom of choice, as a consumer. I will not abandon US car companies for past sins. Adaptation is an admirable trait, and coming from behind to catch up and re-join the front of the pack is a Herculean task...and they pulled it off.
While other nations' automobile industries have folded under into oblivion (Britain is a good example), ours have managed to make an extreme turnaround against horrific odds. I am very proud of them, and I feel they have demonstrated values we as Americans hold very dear...determination, fortitude, and best of all...victory over overwhelming odds.
As for me, I really don't care HOW much American-sourced content is in a Korean-owned company's automobile...the title of this thread will always offend me. I believe statements like this will do them more bad than good in the long run. They can NEVER be "more American" than an American company.
BlackEco wrote:Bill Hahn Jr. wrote:Jookycola wrote:I believe in freedom. It's what makes this country the best place on earth to live. We are free to live our lives and make our own decisions. I also believe in freedom of choice and competition. We all work hard for what we have so we should be able to buy whatever we want.
Detroit pissed on the consumer with poor product and even worse customer service. That left door wide open for imports to welcome people to their products. They did this to themselves. The products may be great now but now they screwed themselves and have to convince people they are better. But if a Korean car maker can prove they are more American that's a poor showing for domestic companies trying to wave the u.s. flag and guilt.
I also believe in freedom of choice, as a consumer. I will not abandon US car companies for past sins. Adaptation is an admirable trait, and coming from behind to catch up and re-join the front of the pack is a Herculean task...and they pulled it off.
While other nations' automobile industries have folded under into oblivion (Britain is a good example), ours have managed to make an extreme turnaround against horrific odds. I am very proud of them, and I feel they have demonstrated values we as Americans hold very dear...determination, fortitude, and best of all...victory over overwhelming odds.
As for me, I really don't care HOW much American-sourced content is in a Korean-owned company's automobile...the title of this thread will always offend me. I believe statements like this will do them more bad than good in the long run. They can NEVER be "more American" than an American company.
You don't get it. GM is not an "American" car company. They are an international corporation owned by interests all over the world. The only thing that makes them American now is that tax payers have been forced to buy into their equity. I would expect nothing short of an "amazing" turn around given all corporate welfare which has been shelled out to these "American" companies. Socializing international debt, there is a real American value for you!