Quote:
The much-rumored mid-engined Corvette project has been unexpectedly confirmed by a senior Saab source.
The engineer revealed in a trade magazine that Saab’s engineers had developed a double-clutch transmission for a "mid-engined version of the Corvette" when Saab was General Motors' centre of competence for those systems.
The source also revealed that the wet-clutch transmission was designed to cope with up to 590lbft of torque, only marginally less than delivered by today’s Corvette ZR-1 V8.
The news of the DCT project confirms just how serious GM was about shifting to a mid-engined layout for the new-generation car.
It’s thought that the mid-engined Corvette concept was fully engineered but became a victim of the credit crunch in 2008.
However, the latest rumours from the US suggest the mid-engined layout is now back on the agenda for the next-generation C8 Corvette, which is expected to arrive in five years’ time.
GM bosses are also said to be considering downsizing to a V6 engine, probably backed up by turbochargers. The C8 could also be more compact and lighter, possibly using more aluminium in its construction.
Eternal wrote:The remind me of the Acura NSX
Eternal wrote:The remind me of the Acura NSX
Mike Demo wrote:the vette going v6 is insane. corvette is not made for that. it is supposed to be the american answer to euro performance. that means it always had the big engine. was it always the most efficient no turn teh best no (well thats changing) but always a throaty v8. for shame...
(before someone tells me the vette came with a inline 6 originally, i ask when the chevy v8 was introduced.)
Jookycola wrote:Mike Demo wrote:the vette going v6 is insane. corvette is not made for that. it is supposed to be the american answer to euro performance. that means it always had the big engine. was it always the most efficient no turn teh best no (well thats changing) but always a throaty v8. for shame...
(before someone tells me the vette came with a inline 6 originally, i ask when the chevy v8 was introduced.)
Yeah, but Mike look at all the amazing things BMW is doing with Twin Turbo sixes. Done correctly they wouldn't need a V8 and the car would be lighter. Making a much better balanced sports car.
Jookycola wrote:Mike Demo wrote:the vette going v6 is insane. corvette is not made for that. it is supposed to be the american answer to euro performance. that means it always had the big engine. was it always the most efficient no turn teh best no (well thats changing) but always a throaty v8. for shame...
(before someone tells me the vette came with a inline 6 originally, i ask when the chevy v8 was introduced.)
Yeah, but Mike look at all the amazing things BMW is doing with Twin Turbo sixes. Done correctly they wouldn't need a V8 and the car would be lighter. Making a much better balanced sports car.
Jookycola wrote:Mike Demo wrote:the vette going v6 is insane. corvette is not made for that. it is supposed to be the american answer to euro performance. that means it always had the big engine. was it always the most efficient no turn teh best no (well thats changing) but always a throaty v8. for shame...
(before someone tells me the vette came with a inline 6 originally, i ask when the chevy v8 was introduced.)
Yeah, but Mike look at all the amazing things BMW is doing with Twin Turbo sixes. Done correctly they wouldn't need a V8 and the car would be lighter. Making a much better balanced sports car.
mitdr774 wrote:Why add more complexity, weight, and extra BS to go wrong when the push rod V8 has been kicking ass for years?? It has been shown over and over that the Vette with its old tech engine can out power and out fuel economy "high tech" Euro cars.
mitdr774 wrote:Why add more complexity, weight, and extra BS to go wrong when the push rod V8 has been kicking ass for years?? It has been shown over and over that the Vette with its old tech engine can out power and out fuel economy "high tech" Euro cars.