Consumer reports 07' Top Pics - Other Cars Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
Consumer reports 07' Top Pics
Thursday, March 08, 2007 8:45 AM
To be a 'Top Pick', a vehicle must score at or near the top of its category in Consumer Reports' testing, must have at least average reliability and must perform well in government and Insurance Institute crash tests.

BUDGET CAR, SUBCOMPACT
Honda Fit
Cost: $14,000 to $16,000

Consumer Reports calls the Fit the "best overall in a new class of fuel-efficient cars."

Fuel economy, as measured in Consumer Reports' controlled tests, was 32 mpg with an automatic transmission and 34 mpg with a manual.

"Not only is it fun to drive, but its compact dimensions pack an impressive amount of interior room and versatility," the magazine said.

The Fit got top scores in "Reliability," "Crash protection" and "Satisfaction." Its road test score was good, but not the best.

This has become a crowded market segment with a number of good entries, said David Champion, head of auto testing for Consumer Reports.



"The Nissan Versa we thought was very good," he said. "The Kia Rio and Hyundai Accent were very good."

SEDAN, LESS THAN $20,000
Honda Civic
Cost: $17,000 to $23,000

Cosumer Reports praises the Civic for its "relatively roomy interior, comfortable ride, smooth powertrain and good handling."

It also helps that the Civic has good reliability, crash test results and fuel economy.

In Consumer Reports' tests, it got 31 mpg with a manual transmission and 28 with an automatic. The hybrid version got 37 mpg.

SEDAN, $20,000 TO $30,000
Honda Accord
Cost: $20,000 to $33,000

Like the Civic, the Accord is availaible in a hybrid version, which offers only slightly better fuel economy, however.

In Consumer Reports' testing, the Accord Hybrid got 25 mpg, while a V6 Accord got 23 mpg and the 4-cylinder version got 24.

"The Accord provides an excellent balance of comfort, roominess, ride and handling," the magazine says.

SEDAN, $30,000 TO $40,000
Infiniti G35
Cost: $35,000 to $39,000

The G35 is available in rear-wheel-drive or all-wheel-drive.

The G35 "really blows the BMW 3-series away at its own game," said David Champion, head of auto testing for Consumer Reports. "It's extremely fast - 306 horsepower, zero-to-60 in 5.4 seconds - really agile handling, great steering, reasonable amount of room inside and really easy to live with on a day-to-day basis."

Its reliability has also been excellent, Champion said, although the record for parent company Nissan has been spotty.

LUXURY SEDAN
Infiniti M35
Cost: $42,000 to $45,000

The M35 earned the highest score of any sedan in Consumer Reports' testing, according to the magazine.

"Well equipped and comfortable, it's just as capable on a twisty two-lane road as it is cruising down the highway."

Like the smaller G35 - also a Top Pick - it's available with either rear- or all-wheel-drive. The V8-power M45 costs about $55,000.

In the same class, the BMW 530i and Audi A6 are also worth considering, the magazine said.

SUV, LESS THAN $30,000
Toyota Rav4
Cost: $23,000 to $27,000

The Rav4 was redesigned for 2006, adding more room and an optional third row of seats. An optional V6 engine gives smooth performance and good power while provided just 1 mpg lower fuel economy in Consumer Reports' testing.

The Rav4 also got top marks for reliability and crash protection.

The newly redesigned Honda CR-V is another good choice, the magazine said.

SUV, MORE THAN $30,000
Toyota Highlander Hybrid
Cost: 35,000 to $40,000

Although the Highlander Hybrid is a Top Pick, even Consumer Reports wouldn't advise you to buy it now. That's because the redesigned 2008 version will be available very soon.

The 2007 Highlander offers a comfortable, quiet ride and excellent quality, according to Consumer Reports. The new version will have a movable second row, to allow for more space in the third row, according to Toyota.

The Hybrid offers all the benefits of the non-hybrid Highlander with better acceleration but only slightly better fuel economy (22 mpg) in Consumer Reports' testing. The redesigned will be the same, in terms of the drivetrain, as the current version.

MINIVAN
Toyota Sienna
Cost: $26,000 to $28,000

When Consumer Reports first started releasing "Top Picks" in 1997, the minivan chosen was the Dodge Caravan/Plymouth Voyager.

The Toyota Sienna and Honda Odyssey have traded the top spot ever since. With the addition of a more powerful engine, the Sienna takes it back after two years of going to the Odyssey.

"It's a little bit quieter, a little bit more refined, little bit more comfortable than the Odyssey," said David Champion, head of Consumer Reports' auto testing.

Champion also said that, for his personal use, he would go for the Honda.

"I'm a bit more of a driver," he said. "I prefer the Odyssey. It's got a bit more of a sports car performance in a minivan."

GREEN CAR
Toyota Prius
Cost: $23,000

The Prius got 44 mpg overall in Consumer Reports' testing, the best the magazine has ever measured for a 5-passenger vehicle.

The interior is also roomy enough, for both occupants and luggage, to make the Prius a viable alternative to an ordinary family sedan.

A rearview camera is available and, the magazine says, "highly recommended."

FUN TO DRIVE
Mazda MX-5 Miata
Cost: $21,000 to $27,000

The Miata offers balanced handling, pinpoint-precise steering and a crisp six-speed manual transmission.

Its cloth top can be raised and lowered with one hand without leaving the seat. A new power-folding hard-top is available for 2007.

Reliability is fair, but that's good enough to earn a recommendation.

The Miata competes against the Pontiac Solstice and the closely-related Saturn Sky. So far, the Solstice has been outselling the Miata.

"I think [the Solstice] is going to do very well for the first couple of years," said David Champion, head of Consumer Reports' auto testing, "but I think, over the long term, this is the better sports car."

Where are the American cars?

This year's Consumer Reports Top Picks are all vehicles produced by Japanese companies. This is actually the second year in a row that that's been the case. In the 10 years that Consumer Reports has produced annual "Top Picks" lists, it's the fifth time there have been no American cars among them.

The biggest problem is that fewer American cars even make it into consideration. To be a "Top Pick," a vehicle must first earn Consumer Reports' general recommendation. That doesn't mean it's the best, but it's at least proven to be reliable, safe, it handles well and is reasonably easy to live with.

Of 23 Toyotas tested by Consumer Reports since 2000, 20 are recommended. Of 37 General Motors cars tested, only 13 are recommended. For Ford, it's eight out of 17 and, for Chrysler, four out of 20.

Besides reliability, American cars can fall down in other areas. Ford, for example, tends to do well in ride and handling, but poorly in braking performance and fuel economy, according to Consumer Reports. While GM has improved greatly in the "fit and finish" of its cars, there still tend to be problems with emergency handling and fuel economy, Consumer Reports says.

Chrysler has the second-lowest score of any automaker in Consumer Reports testing. Bad visibility, cheap interiors and noisy engines are cited as specific problems.

Things are getting better, though. New models and recently redesigned cars from Ford and GM are much more reliable and getting better test scores. The Ford Focus and Buick Lucerne, while not top-rated, are cited as two very good cars that signal a potential turnaround for Detroit products.

And in case you think Consumer Reports always likes Japanese car companies, there is one company with lower average scores than Chrysler: Suzuki.

Copyrighted, CNNMoney. All Rights Reserved




Re: Consumer reports 07' Top Pics
Thursday, March 08, 2007 9:11 AM
Consumer reports can kis my a$$ because the Saturn Aura $hits on the Accord in the 20-30K range.





Re: Consumer reports 07' Top Pics
Thursday, March 08, 2007 9:27 AM
the hyundai sonata v6 is MUCH MUCH CHEAPER THAN THE ACCORD comparably equipped... and the sonata my mom has @!#$s all over accords with every option... how many v6 sedans can you get with premium sound, tiptronic trans, 400 miles to the tank 36mpg highway, etc... for UNDER 20K... honda can kiss my ass.
Re: Consumer reports 07' Top Pics
Thursday, March 08, 2007 9:32 AM
Because Consumer Reports isn't biased or anything...




"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about
the former." - Albert Einstein

Re: Consumer reports 07' Top Pics
Thursday, March 08, 2007 9:51 AM
Meh, I agree with some of those. Except on the Minivan and SUVs.



>>>For Sale? Clicky!<<<
-----The orginal Mr.Goodwrench on the JBO since 11/99-----

Re: Consumer reports 07' Top Pics
Thursday, March 08, 2007 3:23 PM
consumer reports is a piece of @!#$ rag



Re: Consumer reports 07' Top Pics
Thursday, March 08, 2007 7:55 PM
Dave wrote:Because Consumer Reports isn't biased or anything...


I agree. Consumer Reports is terrible when it comes to automobiles.



Re: Consumer reports 07' Top Pics
Thursday, March 08, 2007 9:27 PM
They take reliability scores from individuals... Not from NTSB, or Manufacturer/dealer service reports.

I have to say that the Toyota, Honda, VW and BMW that I've owned, they were utter pieces of shyte.

1986 Toyota 4 Runner: frame bent, bed was rusted to hell.
1991 Honda Civic HB: too small, How Odd No Damned Acceleration problem... It got Honda's JDM spec Rust problem in spades.
1995 VW Golf 4dr: 2pointsl0wwww engine, trans decided to take a dump, and then the fuel pump ate it.
2002 BMW 325 ci: Had to change the rad 3x under warranty, random electrical problems, driver's seat became unadjustable after 1st winter and the leather ended up separating on the left side of the upper front of the seat.

The 4 runner, the Honda and the VW were used, dealer maintained, and ended up dying within 2 years of me getting them and driving them normally (under 18,000 Kms a year, regular maintenance).

The BMW was my mom's but it was a piece of Ütter-junk. The lease was terminated after the 3rd rad replacement, and the driver's seat upper cover was replaced. They never did manage to get all the electrical gremlins sorted out.

I've had @!#$ty domestics as well, but I don't think that foreign = reliable.





Re: Consumer reports 07' Top Pics
Friday, March 09, 2007 3:27 AM
I know you don't feel that way GAM unfortunately most of the uniformed motorists do.



05 M6 YJ GTO 1 of 447 12.767@109.93
Re: Consumer reports 07' Top Pics
Friday, March 09, 2007 9:18 AM
If you want to learn about the latest new cars, you should read automotive magazines, not magazines that specialize in testing household products like toilet paper and toaster ovens. Motor Trend, for example, does their own long term reliability tests instead of polling their readers as consumer's reports does. The demographic of consumer's reports subscribers is mostly a bunch of left-wing, Ralph Nader-loving tree-huggers, not automotive enthusiasts. Nothing against left-wing, Ralph Nader-loving tree-huggers, I just don't want them deciding which car I should buy!




Re: Consumer reports 07' Top Pics
Saturday, March 10, 2007 6:25 AM
i agree w/ all of you, i have never really taken them all to seriously i just thought it was interesting EVERY car on the list was from japan, come on, there are other realy nice cars out there.

they only give their reports based on their subscribers, unlike J.D. Power who send out surveys to new car buyers around the country and takes the results, and according to them the playing field is more balanced.




Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search