Dakota RT's - Other Cars Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
Dakota RT's
Monday, December 18, 2006 5:25 PM
Well my buddy has always been a huge fan of these truck, and found one for a killer deal a few hours away. So tommorrow me and him are going to look at it. What are some areas that we should look at on these trucks. I heard the ball joints are prone to go out on the rt models somewhere as well as tranny problems. Does anyone know a good forum that specializes in dodge trucks aswell? Thanks




Re: Dakota RT's
Monday, December 18, 2006 5:34 PM
you got it - it's a chrysler... ball joints and automatic trannies.





also, if it's the original battery, have them put in a new one. chrysler OE batteries are also junk.








Re: Dakota RT's
Monday, December 18, 2006 5:44 PM
here are some forums....I am a current Dakota owner/lover


http://www.dakotausa.com
http://www.dakota-durango.com
http://www.dodgetalk.com


all the guys at these sites are extremely helpful, especially with the R/T trucks, they are good trucks, just watch the tranny, and make sure to check the VIN at a Dodge Dealership to see if the recall has been completed all ready, other than that should be all set. If you have any comments, questions, or concerns feel free to email me


Go Premium, it builds character!

Re: Dakota RT's
Monday, December 18, 2006 6:35 PM
All i know is I hung with one in my Z24. not once but 3 times (please note i didn't say "smoked")
my Z was lightly modded (i.e. intake, exaust..the basics) The only thing i could imagine is mine was 5 speed...maybe his was automatic? All i know was he was in shock and we pulled over and talked a bit, he was a hella cool guy. The truck was nice.

I just wouldn't buy anything Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep. Except the Jeep Wrangler. Everyone i know has massive problems with their DCX cars and trucks.



"Formerly known as Jammit - JBO member since 1998" JBOM | CSS.net

Re: Dakota RT's
Monday, December 18, 2006 6:59 PM
Gas mileage = teh suck. But they do look cool...and run somewhere in the mid/low 15's stock.




Re: Dakota RT's
Monday, December 18, 2006 7:37 PM
the dakota rt is awesome
very capable truck for speeed

.


Two wrongs don't make a right. Unless you're Chuck Norris.
Then two wrongs make a roundhouse kick to the face.
Re: Dakota RT's
Monday, December 18, 2006 7:50 PM
good friend of mine has a 4x4 with 130 something on the 4.7. its been great so far. he's got a body lift, 33's ram srt-10 style ram air hood and just got a roadarmor winch mount bumper and piaa lights for it. sweet looking truck


women are like cars you have to test drive the new one before you trade in the old one
Re: Dakota RT's
Tuesday, December 19, 2006 4:19 AM
I used to semi-race one up the on-ramp to the interstate. Sometimes the Dakota R/T 4.7L was in front of me, sometimes behind me. The Cavalier was clearly faster off the line up to 60-70 mph at which point his R/T seemed to get its legs and hold its own. I love the Dakota R/T trucks styling and that they come with a small V-8.


"...nevermind maneuvers lieutenant, just go straight at them!"
-Admiral Nelson at the Battle of Trafalgar

Re: Dakota RT's
Tuesday, December 19, 2006 5:25 AM
isnt the r/t the 360? i know my colorado will edge out my buddies dakota from a stop and a roll, i don't know if its the exception or the rule though.


women are like cars you have to test drive the new one before you trade in the old one
Re: Dakota RT's
Tuesday, December 19, 2006 7:14 AM
Are you talking about the R/T 5.9L?

Rob




Image
Sold 2/2/05
Re: Dakota RT's
Tuesday, December 19, 2006 7:24 AM
R/T 5.9L or 360ci yes




Re: Dakota RT's
Tuesday, December 19, 2006 12:37 PM
the 360 was the only motor that ever came in the RT.



here's a good website for the year-to-year changes and common problems with Dakotas - click me!






Re: Dakota RT's
Tuesday, December 19, 2006 3:01 PM
Now that I think about it, the R/T had to have a 360 and not a 4.7 litre


"...nevermind maneuvers lieutenant, just go straight at them!"
-Admiral Nelson at the Battle of Trafalgar

Re: Dakota RT's
Wednesday, December 20, 2006 6:29 PM
hand me down ram 1500 engine same drive train smaller truck


Re: Dakota RT's
Monday, January 01, 2007 3:33 AM
I edged out my buddy's 2000 Dakota R/T extended cab a while back when he first got it. My Z24 is completely stock and so was his truck. It really shocked the hell outta me that I won.


98 Trans Am
6.0, L92 heads, LS3 intake, TSP 231/236 cam, and much more


Re: Dakota RT's
Saturday, January 06, 2007 7:52 PM
Quote:

you got it - it's a chrysler... ball joints and automatic trannies.



And GM's Head gasket issue's are better? I work for Dodge and yes the trannies do fail but usually at about 120K. They are very easy to rebuild and MOPAR sells complete kits for them. As for ball joints I see them more on the late 90's Durangos more then anything. I have yet to see an R/T need them.





ASE Certified Techician
DaimlerChrysler Certified Techician
Va Safety Inspector
Member Of TECHNET Professionals
Member Option D Racing
Re: Dakota RT's
Saturday, January 06, 2007 9:24 PM
I just have to say this, ANY vehicle will have ball joint problems, no one designs them to last longer than others, and they damn sure don't design them to last forever. It's not just Chrysler that has ball joint issues, every vehicle with a ball joint will have issues at some point in time.



1983 Camaro Z28
Re: Dakota RT's
Saturday, January 06, 2007 11:40 PM
the ball joint issues they are referring to, are at about 30k intervals. but i believe thats on the latest generation, not the older ones.



Don't steal, the government doesn't like competition
Re: Dakota RT's
Sunday, January 07, 2007 6:30 AM
Option D wrote:
Quote:

you got it - it's a chrysler... ball joints and automatic trannies.



And GM's Head gasket issue's are better? I work for Dodge and yes the trannies do fail but usually at about 120K. They are very easy to rebuild and MOPAR sells complete kits for them. As for ball joints I see them more on the late 90's Durangos more then anything. I have yet to see an R/T need them.

uh, i am just pointing out the obvious problems, no need to get defensive. that doesn't mean i dislike chryslers, but he asked for stuff to look out for when buying a dakota, and i told him. as and far as the ball joints only occuring on durangos, aren't they identical to the dakotas from the front doors forward? cough, cough








Re: Dakota RT's
Sunday, January 07, 2007 7:21 AM
No, don't get me wrong everyone. I'm not getting defensive at all. I'm just pointing out that I have seen none of the R/T's at my dealership needing them. Is it possable, yes.





ASE Certified Techician
DaimlerChrysler Certified Techician
Va Safety Inspector
Member Of TECHNET Professionals
Member Option D Racing
Re: Dakota RT's
Sunday, January 07, 2007 9:33 AM
spin1r6 wrote:the ball joint issues they are referring to, are at about 30k intervals. but i believe thats on the latest generation, not the older ones.


I'm not going to doubt you, but I find this hard to believe without some kind of proof.



1983 Camaro Z28

Re: Dakota RT's
Sunday, January 07, 2007 7:43 PM
my parents used to have a 1999 durango, and when they traded it in, it had 45,000 miles on it and already had the ball joints replaced once. i know i can't give you hard evidence, but it is true. though, i still like durangos a lot, and if i could find a good deal on one, i'd probably buy it.








Re: Dakota RT's
Sunday, January 07, 2007 8:35 PM
My buddy at school has one.

I've driven it and personally love it.





Disclaimer: I will probally offend you with what is written in this post.


Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search