Quote:
Thankfully appearances deceive and the Rocket works much better than it should. It's balanced, fast, has excellent brakes, fast, handles well, and did I mention that it's fast?
...
Displacing a class-busting 2300cc's, Triumph claims some 140 bhp and 147 ft/lbs of torque, strong enough to shove even a tobacco barn down the road. Impressive? Yes, but scary too. In any gear, I could whack the throttle open and the bike slammed forward like an angry F-18 on full afterburner.
...
I never forgot that motorcycling's biggest baddest dog was pounding away between my legs.
...
Inside the silvery cases lives a fuel injected liquid-cooled oversquare DOHC powerplant with 4 valves per cylinder activated via shim and bucket. 2 sparkplugs for each cylinder light the mixture and the 120-degree crank spins clockwise while balance, input and final-drive shafts all rotate the other way.
...
Those monster throttle bodies suck loud air, the horizon goes blurry, and around fifty-five hundred the mill really howls. By then you'll back off anyway, palms sweaty and eyeballs itchy from windburn. This thing flat-out cooks.
...
The Rocket uses an advanced digital engine management system. Various sensors (throttle body, engine revs, coolant/ambient temperature and exhaust gas) all feed information back to the ECU. A master chip processes the data and balances throttle valves, timing and fuel delivery for optimum performance. Basically the engine maps itself, cylinder by cylinder, for the best possible running.
...
A first for any Triumph, final drive is shaft and bevel gear inside super-thick alloy cases. What else could be counted on to reliably control the bike's enormous power and torque?
...
Clutch pull is feathery light with progressive engagement easily controlled even though this is, yes, you guessed it, the largest clutch ever fitted to a production bike.
...
One of the bike's idiosyncrasies is a lack of engine braking. Maybe it's due to the 39-pound flywheel
...
In spite of its intimidating size and weight, I was able to toss the machine into corners almost like a sportbike.
...
Styling is best described as "completely bonkers meets incredible excess".
...
The curved shift lever rubbed my left foot sore, but your feet are likely smaller. Besides, with 147 ft/lbs of torque on tap, shifting is entirely optional.
...
The throttle delivers euphoria just like those hand-held morphine drips in the hospital emergency room.
Bballjamal (Cav-AtL) wrote:Thinking high 8s to 10s?
ChrisIDV wrote:Bballjamal (Cav-AtL) wrote:Thinking high 8s to 10s?
I highly doubt that. It weighs over 700 pounds and has under 150 hp/ft pounds. It's got good power for driving around town and running from light to light but that thing would need a rocket straped to the fender to run 10's let alone 8's.
Scarab (Jersey Jay 1.8T) wrote:i was asking for a MSRP, not a projected 1/4 ET lol..... 850 lbs (assuming a 150 lb drive) would probably pretty easily do mid 11's but i'm not sure if it would be any faster than that. I've always liked triumph though, and when it comes to bikes racing doesn't really matter to me cuz i'd be too scared to do a sub 12 pass with no safety cage around me lol. i like the security of a car and having some "armor" around me when racing.Right on the money.
Motorcyclist Online wrote:Triumph Rocket 3 = 11.30sec @ 119.84 Stock
The GoOoOch wrote:Exhaust is damn ugly, other than that its not too bad. I'd still rather take a Valkyrie Rune over it anyday for styling.Yes, the whole bike has kind of sub-par styling, but that's what the Brits are good for
The power is nice but nuthin to make me jump out of my shorts over. I'd still pick a Harley or a Valkyrie or Victory. Even if they don't make the same power. There is however 600cc sport bikes pushin that power.
LD9 Fury!(Shopping for an Eco) wrote:Scarab (Jersey Jay 1.8T) wrote:i was asking for a MSRP, not a projected 1/4 ET lol..... 850 lbs (assuming a 150 lb drive) would probably pretty easily do mid 11's but i'm not sure if it would be any faster than that. I've always liked triumph though, and when it comes to bikes racing doesn't really matter to me cuz i'd be too scared to do a sub 12 pass with no safety cage around me lol. i like the security of a car and having some "armor" around me when racing.Right on the money.
Motorcyclist Online wrote:Triumph Rocket 3 = 11.30sec @ 119.84 Stock
Father financed this bike at $24,500 from Lexington Motorsports.
Any you're also right about the british electrical systems... it make no sense at all, and has proven to be very volatile, picky, and sometimes more complex than it needed to be at all.
Current mods:
*Jardine performance exhaust
*Bored / Port-matched exh. manifold (head and collector)
*Removed catalytic converter
*Reprogrammed ECU
- Removed fuel / ignition limiters for 1st & 2nd gears (made to maintain fuel effieiency in lower gears), ~~+7% horsepower in those gears
- Recalibrated fuel / ignition for new exhaust to maintain correct A/F Ratio, ran lean on hi-flow exhaust w/o reflash
- General fuel / ignition improvements
*K&N drop-in air filter for now, looking into full aftermarket intake, no luck so far this is the current project.
Future Mods:
*Full aftermarket intake system, temporary until turbocharged.
*P&P head
*Custom-grind cams, very mild (gotta be some company out there who will do it)
*Sooner or later to be turbocharged. I think the turbo setup the other guy did used a Mitusbishi Super 15G or 16G. Not sure.
*Full custom exhaust manifold and collector section for turbo.
*Forged pistons, stronger rods
There is a guy who rigged up a dry nitrous system to it... I don't think that'll be necessary
themarin8r wrote:with your mods it should be in the high 10's
ChrisIDV wrote:No that's just an estimation Bballjamal and themarin8r made. Check my last post, it dialed in 11.30 @ 119.84 Stock. There's a good change it's in the 10's with the mods done to it.themarin8r wrote:with your mods it should be in the high 10's
I thought you said it should run 10's stock???
ChrisIDV wrote:Chris, I think you've got the it confused with a Harley My apologies Harley fans!Bballjamal (Cav-AtL) wrote:Thinking high 8s to 10s?I highly doubt that. It weighs over 700 pounds and has under 150 hp/ft pounds. It's got good power for driving around town and running from light to light but that thing would need a rocket straped to the fender to run 10's let alone 8's.
The GoOoOch wrote:I would rather ride a Victory or a Valkyrie over that thing any day. As far as not being comparible to sport bikes, no its not. When u say try comparing a chevelle to a civic, well nothin like that at all. For one the bikes not blown, cammed and open header'd.LOL I'm aware of this, it was just an exaggerated analogy, take it easy. Didn't say it was faster / more powerful than a good sport bike. They're totally different animals, can't really compare them, and I wasn't trying to... just commenting on the sound.
Right now i got a street bike, hopin to get a second cruiser soon. Both have there advantages, both just as comfortable to cruise distances on. If you know how to ride properly on a sport bike.
ChrisIDV wrote:I am confused about nothing. I was being a smart ass.I know you were, so was I man!
ChrisIDV wrote:I am confused about nothing. I was being a smart ass.
www.motorcyclistonline.com wrote:While prerelease hype suggested it might be the quickest and fastest straightline motorcycle ever, there are in fact other Triumphs that will give the Rocket III a run for its money. That said, a best quarter-mile run of 11.27 seconds at 119.92 mph remains a very impressive achievement for such a huge motorcycle.
Ian Brown Music wrote:the V-Max and Rocket 3 aren't even comparable. the only similarity they have is big power (and not-so-great handling). the V-Max was designed as a Hooligan bike, pure and simple. it's the 2-wheeled equivalent of a Mustang or Camaro - fast, powerful-looking, and has a high fun-per-dollar ratio. the Rocket, on the other hand, is like an S-Class Mercedes - big, powerful, elegantly-styled, and not meant to be a racer.V Max is pretty kicka$$ too. I never knew what to think of it though. Admittedly, a lot more suited for racing over the Rocket. Has a very striking profile with the sport-bike appearance we all like, and the formidable 70-degree V-4 strapped in there. At 580lbs versus the Rocket's 704lbs it's definitely got the upper hand in that field as well. I'd hit it And you're right, the Rocket's like driving a cement truck on 2 wheels compared to a lot of bikes (actually MOST bikes) when it comes to handling. Doesn't help that I weigh 230lbs on top of the bike's 704lbs. That's almost a half-ton of pure manliness flyin down the street
so, what do you want to drive, a musclecar or luxo-barge?
BTW - that's a fine-ass bike
GAM (The Kilted One) wrote:Chuck Norris / Vin Diesel / Jack Bauer / Mr. T (pick your favorite) can do anything he wants with no repercussions, fool. Ya betta recognize...
Call me crazy.. but isn't it a good idea to keep your hands on the handle-bars instead of taking a pic @ 50mph?