I think most people use Photomatix for combining there pics they use 3 different exposures +2 them 0 the -2 some use +2,+1,0,-1,-2 theres alot of how too's on the next
are you familiar with photoshop? You can go file - automate - merge to HDR, and you get full control of your images.
LarryMartin830 wrote:I think most people use Photomatix for combining there pics they use 3 different exposures +2 then 0 then -2 some use +2,+1,0,-1,-2 theres alot of how too's on the next
That's how I do it, then just play with the settings until you find something you like. It's actually pretty easy.. Just a little time consuming at times
quote=LarryMartin830]I think most people use Photomatix for combining there pics they use 3 different exposures +2 them 0 the -2 some use +2,+1,0,-1,-2 theres alot of how too's on the next
Yea Photomatix is pretty good! Alot of people use it, I did for a little.
I now currently use Dynamic HDR which is pretty good and is also a little cheaper than Photomatix and i would have to say is pretty easy to use!
![](http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h81/EcoEnvy/Sig2-1.jpg)
2004 Turbo cavalier 11PSI and blown!
98z24ragtop wrote:just downlaoded photomatix and dynamic HDR. I'm gonna give em both a shot. I'm loving this new trend. HDRs are so cool ![](/global/images/emoticons/ag.gif)
Post up some of your pics after you play around with them!
![](http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h81/EcoEnvy/Sig2-1.jpg)
2004 Turbo cavalier 11PSI and blown!
Most of the ones I've done have been with Photoshop CS2. There are a bunch of good writeups on the net.
i think Dynamic HDR is SOO much better
Don't know if this will help anyone, but there is a three part tutorial podcast on iTunes. I can't d/l 'em, so not sure how the quality is....