95 suspension vs 2003 supension - Suspension and Brake Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
95 suspension vs 2003 supension
Friday, April 06, 2007 7:27 PM
when I had my 95 cavalier I had a 1.75 inch drop on it and the car looked uneven what I would like to know is if a 2003 cavalier is "straight"

here is a picture of my 95 to show what i'm talking about


I know it was dirty but it's the only picture I have that shows what I mean.
The Rear looks lower than the Front ...





Re: 95 suspension vs 2003 supension
Friday, April 06, 2007 8:12 PM
it shouldnt be like that. stock the front end is lower (postive rake) you want to keep a positive rake with a drop.



My car may run 18s, but I can do your taxes in 10 seconds flat.
JBO lube - they would never have enough in stock and we'd never see RodimusPrime again
Re: 95 suspension vs 2003 supension
Friday, April 06, 2007 8:36 PM
do you have anything in the trunk? like a system?



Im a Xbox 360 fanboy...and damn proud of it!!
Re: 95 suspension vs 2003 supension
Friday, April 06, 2007 8:42 PM
yeah like 2 15inch




Re: 95 suspension vs 2003 supension
Saturday, April 07, 2007 10:02 AM
The stock springs and shocks are the same on both the 95 and 03. Your car would still have a positive rake with 03 springs.

If you want the car to be level, then you would need a set of aftermarket springs, that drop the rear more than the front. IE: sportlines, ect.



Re: 95 suspension vs 2003 supension
Saturday, April 07, 2007 12:55 PM
oh well... we'll see what summer brings in term of money for now I will get my goldline installed !




Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search