cavalier sho - Performance Forum

This thread is locked.
For more information about why this thread might have been locked, please read the rules.
cavalier sho
Thursday, December 13, 2007 9:57 PM
i know all of us hate this ideal but it would be an awsom power match what if you took a f0rd sho 3.0l v6 engine and pcm and transplante it in to a 2 door cavalier it would be the ultimate sleeper 220 whp v6 no one would see you coming but they will shure seeyour tail lights.


Re: cavalier sho
Thursday, December 13, 2007 10:04 PM
kthnx?


Re: cavalier sho
Thursday, December 13, 2007 10:16 PM
any thoughts or ideals will it work ford engins in a chevy ide have to call it a dodge
and yes im a ricer lol
Re: cavalier sho
Thursday, December 13, 2007 10:29 PM
Re: cavalier sho
Thursday, December 13, 2007 10:47 PM
Are we both looking at the same picture? It looks like it barely fits in a taurus, how do you expect it to fit in a Cav?

Just swap in a GM 3400 V6 and call it a day. It's a fairly easy swap and has far more potential than a streeted fwd compact car can handle.


-

"Youth in Asia"...I don't see anything wrong with that.
Re: cavalier sho
Thursday, December 13, 2007 11:08 PM
that wasnt my point it's a conceptial ideal would it work
i have seen dozens of 3400 swaps all gm motors ok it's a cavalier a gm product
im not doging any one or any build iv seen they all look nice i just want to do something different
than someone else has done
Re: cavalier sho
Thursday, December 13, 2007 11:23 PM
i can pick up a 3.0 v6 sho with transmission and linkage for around $750.00 and me going to pick it up if not ill probably find some other use
Re: cavalier sho
Friday, December 14, 2007 3:14 AM
Wanna do something different? Learn to use punctuation! Then learn what it takes to put a GM 3.4L DOHC V-6 under your hood. And leave the SHO engine for the Fox-body, Maverick, Pinto-'Stang & Falcon-'Stang builders, huh?

Go beyond the "bolt-on".
Re: cavalier sho
Friday, December 14, 2007 4:31 AM
General rule of thumb- you have to ask if it can be done= you won't be doing it. Noone will have a "how-to" on this.

_





Now with northstar V8, IRS, 20's n 22's
Re: cavalier sho
Friday, December 14, 2007 4:44 AM
1997ztwo4 wrote:General rule of thumb- you have to ask if it can be done= you won't be doing it.

X 1,000





Re: cavalier sho
Friday, December 14, 2007 5:21 AM
Unless you already have some serious fabrication background, your car is just going to end up as scrap metal.

Besides, you don't want to have to maintain that motor...trust me.




fortune cookie say: better a delay than a disaster

Re: cavalier sho
Friday, December 14, 2007 5:34 AM
OHV notec wrote:Unless you already have some serious fabrication background, your car is just going to end up as scrap metal.

Besides, you don't want to have to maintain that motor...trust me.

Yeah, doing something as simple as plugs sucks on those things.





Re: cavalier sho
Friday, December 14, 2007 5:44 AM
Stop saying ideal when you mean to say idea. Using the correct words would be ideal.

Life > You.



Re: cavalier sho
Friday, December 14, 2007 7:49 AM
Quiklilcav wrote:
OHV notec wrote:Unless you already have some serious fabrication background, your car is just going to end up as scrap metal.

Besides, you don't want to have to maintain that motor...trust me.

Yeah, doing something as simple as plugs sucks on those things.
Very true. It's actually easiest to drop the subframe/tranny/motor when you need to do ANY work on that side of the motor.
Khanduras wrote:Stop saying ideal when you mean to say idea.
A friend of mine does that too, but I have no idea how it starts. It's habit though, they can't change.




fortune cookie say: better a delay than a disaster
Re: cavalier sho
Friday, December 14, 2007 3:16 PM
never mind ill find a different forum yall go to hell
Re: cavalier sho
Friday, December 14, 2007 6:12 PM
You'd be better off to keep it all Ford and throw the SHO engine into a Festiva, and call it a day.





Currently #4 in Ecotec Forced Induction horsepower ratings. 505.8 WHP 414WTQ!!!
Currently 3rd quickest Ecotec on the .org - 10.949 @ 131.50 MPH!!!

Re: cavalier sho
Friday, December 14, 2007 6:22 PM
Roofy wrote:You'd be better off to keep it all Ford and throw the SHO engine into a Festiva, and call it a day.
lol, SHOgun FTW. Even better, through some nitrous on top of that like Leno




fortune cookie say: better a delay than a disaster
Re: cavalier sho
Friday, December 14, 2007 6:50 PM
james gilk wrote:never mind ill find a different forum yall go to hell

Good ideal...







Re: cavalier sho
Friday, December 14, 2007 6:57 PM
FstCavZ24 wrote:
james gilk wrote:never mind ill find a different forum yall go to hell

Good ideal...





fortune cookie say: better a delay than a disaster
Re: cavalier sho
Saturday, December 15, 2007 1:26 AM
darn, we lost another retard... shucks! We've got so few of those around here now, losing one is going to make a big dent in the population..... [/sarcasm]




Arrival Blue 04 LS Sport
Eco
Turbo
Megasquirt
'Nuff said
Re: cavalier sho
Saturday, December 15, 2007 6:15 AM
I miss the sound of my SHO when she hit 4400 RPM...

Anybody who has/had/ridden in a sho will second that notion....




Re: cavalier sho
Saturday, December 15, 2007 9:57 AM
bmxludwig wrote:I miss the sound of my SHO when she hit 4400 RPM...

Anybody who has/had/ridden in a sho will second that notion....
Agreed, but 9000 sounds even better




fortune cookie say: better a delay than a disaster
Re: cavalier sho
Sunday, December 16, 2007 12:23 AM
I don't know why you would attempt this.

First of all, you have not seen 'dozens' of 3400 swapped cars. There are not 'dozens' of them out there.

The SHO is what I like to call "old". That engine came out in 1989. We are nearly 20 years later. You can get better mileage, and power from engines that currently run in cars. The SHO engine requires much more maintenance that just some regular ol' other engine. You're really just going to make yourself a huge money pit by doing the swap. If they don't get the 60k they'll start going down the drain fairly quick. All in all, you're just going to make a car that looks neat, but as far as driving it..... it's gonna be way less than impressive.

Quote:

I miss the sound of my SHO when she hit 4400 RPM...

Anybody who has/had/ridden in a sho will second that notion....


I will agree with that. But I know my 2.2 would sorta simulate that when I had the header on it. And the 3400 sounds the same when it's overloaded with fuel. You feel a definate powerband that way. Though, I know there's a different process on the SHO that makes it happen.





Re: cavalier sho
Monday, December 17, 2007 1:47 AM
lol at 2.2 making sho noises.....





Re: cavalier sho
Monday, December 17, 2007 5:05 AM
james gilk wrote:never mind ill find a different forum yall go to hell

Don't let the door hit you in the ass.
Scarab (Jersey Jay 1.8T) wrote:darn, we lost another retard... shucks! We've got so few of those around here now, losing one is going to make a big dent in the population..... [/sarcasm]

LMAO.

Unfortunately, there's plenty more where he came from. Seems we get a new one every day.






This thread is locked.
For more information about why this thread might have been locked, please read the rules.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search