2.5 too much? - Performance Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
2.5 too much?
Friday, March 03, 2006 2:01 PM
i know it's been talked about, but i just wanna make sure .. is 2.5 too much for n/a exhaust? would i be loosing power? come to think of it it's only .25 difference , so does it really make that much of a difference?

Re: 2.5 too much?
Friday, March 03, 2006 2:03 PM
NOPE ! Thats what I'm running and my 60' times have not changed a bit. My trap speed has jumped by a couple mph tho.




Semper Fi SAINT. May you rest in peace.



Re: 2.5 too much?
Friday, March 03, 2006 2:08 PM
great thx...
anybody else running 2.5 n/a exhaust ... what do you have to say?
Re: 2.5 too much?
Friday, March 03, 2006 5:32 PM
welp i've always used this theory on all my cars 4cyl-2.25, v6-2.5, v8/turbo-2.5/3.0 2.5 is good for a 4banger if u want lots of high end breathing,but u risk losing torque and some grunt off the line if u don't have any air intake mods


People say that what doesn't kill you in this life
will make you stronger. I'm not sure if that is true
or not, but i do know one thing-You have to learn from
it and it has to make you better.......it has to.......

Re: 2.5 too much?
Friday, March 03, 2006 6:25 PM
ive seen 2 things about exhaust size on NA engines. ive seen 2.25 for all j body engines. then i also seen 2.25 for 2.2/2200 engines, 2.5 for the 2.4 and Ecotec



Im a Xbox 360 fanboy...and damn proud of it!!
Re: 2.5 too much?
Friday, March 03, 2006 8:24 PM
i have 2.5 inch piping and i love it, it gives good top end power
Re: 2.5 too much?
Friday, March 03, 2006 9:41 PM
ive got 2.5 from the header back, and its definatley better than stock.....wether its better or worse than a 2.25 inch, i don't know, but I like my exhaust. and when im spraying, it helps a bit.
btw this is on a 2003 ecotec



You'll never touch God's hand
You'll never taste God's breath
Because you'll never see the second coming
Life's too short to be focused on insanity
I've seen the ways of God
I'll take the devil any day
Hail Satan

(slayer, skeleton christ, 2006)
Re: 2.5 too much?
Friday, March 03, 2006 11:04 PM
Honestly, it all depends on what you want out of your engine. 2.5" you will lose bottom end power, sure. BUT, it's the minimal size you would want if you ever went the boost route (nitrous, turbo or S/C)

So ask yourself this: Over the course of my car's life, what will I do to it?

Always plan for the future if possible so you don't have to waste your money going back and doing things over again.






Re: 2.5 too much?
Saturday, March 04, 2006 2:57 PM
strohlly7 wrote:welp i've always used this theory on all my cars 4cyl-2.25, v6-2.5, v8/turbo-2.5/3.0 2.5 is good for a 4banger if u want lots of high end breathing,but u risk losing torque and some grunt off the line if u don't have any air intake mods


hate to tell you but back pressure is a big "wise tale" my car did nothing but get better with a 2.5 xhaust. Id say 2.5 is great cause later in life you can boost and not have to change xhaust


http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2187947

Ever one lives 1 page at a time, some stories are longer than others. R.I.P to one of my many best friends. Keep all the tuners safe. See you soon, Love ya man.
Re: 2.5 too much?
Saturday, March 04, 2006 3:49 PM
i think its basically on what muffler you got, well the size in length, cause i was putting 2.25" on my car before my boost and nitrous and i ran it up the road with straight pipes and had NO power at all but it was loud as hell, put a 18 inch muffler on it and it pulled really hard, so i think if you are worried about back preasure with 2.5" exhaust put a 18 inch muffler on it and you should be alright....im no exhaust expert but this is my experience.




Re: 2.5 too much?
Sunday, March 05, 2006 3:48 PM
I got 2.25 piping, Test Pipe instead of a converter, and a flow through muffler, I loss a big of torque but the top end is great.


http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2208703

Re: 2.5 too much?
Monday, March 06, 2006 8:18 AM
I picked up a "grassroots motorsports" magazine a while back that had a full write up on cavaliers. They said that the best for 2.4l engines was 2.5 inch and for the 2.2l to go with 2.25 inch exhaust. It all depends on your future plans (if you plan to go forced induction go with the bigger size). Speaking from my experience on tuning 2 2.4L Z24's: The first one I put on 2.25 inch exhaust system and had great low end grunt but fell off on the high end a bit. While my current Z24 has a 2.5inch with header - big time increase in top end/may have had a slight drop off in low-end torque.
Re: 2.5 too much?
Monday, March 06, 2006 8:29 AM
Well like I said my 60' times did not change a bit so they whole thing of loseing bottom end is indeed an "old wives tale". My mph picked up so the high end breathing part is at least true. Now I do have an intake and head work done too so you may want to take that into account as far as additional mods. Later this year I'm planning a cam swap and perhapps some more head work and bumping up the CR to around 11.1 . That should put me running a flat 14 or perhapps even break 13.999. Then I'll be happy.




Semper Fi SAINT. May you rest in peace.



Re: 2.5 too much?
Monday, March 06, 2006 8:57 AM
wheni re did my eahaust i went to a 2.5" exhaust from 2.25" there was no loss on the bottom end unless someone can dyno. we will not know for sure. I know it did not hurt my car. I ran my car after i replaced with the 2.25 and did better and the ambient temps were warmer than when i ran before with the 2.25'

I personally think if you are going to go 2.25 mandrel bends are better. If a shop is going to fab up an exhaust then i think a 2.5" would be better.


2004 Grand Prix GTP (Competition Group)
SOLD-->1999 Z24 5M-#30 to register on JBO
"You can please some of the people some of the time but you can't please all the people'
all the time


Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search