2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake man.. - Performance Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake man..
Saturday, February 04, 2006 5:47 AM
my question to all you j-body fans.................WHY THE HECK DO YOU CHOOSE TO MOD YOUR 2.4 WITH A H.O INTAKE MANIFOLD? im curiouse it doesnt make sence to me!!

check my ride out from scratch to present and vote for me !!!
http://www.cardomain.com/id/ztwentyfo

Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 6:31 AM
this doesn't have anything to do with this particular part of the forum. kthx, try again please.



Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 7:35 AM
because the Ho engine was making 180hp compared to 150hp for the 2.4. So some parts are better don't you think?

Let's see witch ones:

Cams
Ecm
Rods
Crank
Oil pump
Pistons
Head
Manifold

Hum, the whole engine in other words so before coming here like a smart @**, USE THE RIGHT FORUM, SEARCH, then ask and loose the caps.



Gilles
2.3 Ho

Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 9:15 AM
^^ hes got a point..if the whole engine was better ..and the parts fit your engine, wouldnt it make sense to put as many parts off the better engine onto yours ? ( as far as powergains)
i thought this was common knowledge??



Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 10:10 AM
Because it can look like this if you do it right:







4cyltuner.com - Information Source For 4 Cylinder Tuners
Buy stuff from CarCustoms Ebay! Won't be disappointed!

Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 2:08 PM
my god that is just beautiful!



Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 2:57 PM
justin knieriem wrote:my question to all you j-body fans.................WHY THE HECK DO YOU CHOOSE TO MOD YOUR 2.4 WITH A H.O INTAKE MANIFOLD? im curiouse it doesnt make sence to me!!


The same reason people put intakes, or exhaust, or cams, or anything else that would add hp to the motor.



Click the banner to enter the best Quad4 & Twin Cam site on the internet.
Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 5:09 PM
you guys are gay neways WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The plastic is better then the aluminum 2.3 manifold nomatter how you put it plastick is better then aluminum sorry and if this is the wrong thread u guys must be gay considering that you swith them for performance which this forum is performance. go back to school and get a diploma u drop outs!!

check my ride out from scratch to present and vote for me !!!
http://www.cardomain.com/id/ztwentyfo
Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 5:35 PM
I remember you, you're the dude that got your posts deleted because you wanted to tell people how you know so much about the quad. You're the same guy who wanted to help people remove their limiters.

Explain to me how the plastic one is better please? You are the expert. and I'm just some 18 year old kid.

And if it helps you any. I'm in college so I didn't drop out.



Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 6:01 PM
A recent email from Justin wrote:your engine compartment looks like a total mess clean up them wires then flaunt it but untill you do shut yo face cuz it looks like @!#$!!!


Gotta love fan mail.





4cyltuner.com - Information Source For 4 Cylinder Tuners
Buy stuff from CarCustoms Ebay! Won't be disappointed!

Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 6:34 PM
This is so getting locked. but I'm still waiting to see what he's gonna say to me. haha




Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 6:52 PM
this is funny


Ill make a sig someday
Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 6:53 PM
damn straight.



Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 6:54 PM
ok i dont know who this kid is so maybe someone can explain it to me...but it looks like hes just trying to be a jerk



Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 7:02 PM
Well he made a post a few days ago about him knowing everything there is to know about the Quad series. And he posted it in versus, he offered to tell people how to remove their speed limiters, which was quickly locked and deleted. Then he tried to do the same in performance sayng things like "Stay safe race legal" only much more idiotic sounding than what I'm typing. And that too was locked and deleted.

That's all I know so far.



Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 7:05 PM
He wants to talk about a diploma. He should learn how to spell first.
sence=sense
plastick=plastic
beacuaese=because
findanza=fidanza
custome=custom
wraped=wrapped
carbon fiber rear tales=carbon fiber rear tails
moddified=modified
altinator under drive pullys=alternator under drive pulleys
hancook=hankook
panessonic=panasonic
curiouse=curious



Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 7:06 PM
Owned. ^^^



Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 7:29 PM
ohhhh ok so hes just a the village idiot ..well that explains it



Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 7:40 PM
hum, if he knows that much about the quad, I'll have a few question for him. He can try me and we'll see how smart he is about the 2.3.

If he thinks that plastic is better because it doesn't heat up like the aluminium, I have news for him, after a few hours of city driving, I can still put my hand on my manifold and stay there for 10 minutes without burning myself so it's not a problem. The air moves so fast that it doesn't really do anything.

And the Ho manifold is better than the 2.4 manifold anyway you look at it.



Gilles
2.3 Ho

Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 7:55 PM
What a tool Mfk-223> All



Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 8:15 PM
did he jus say something bad about shifted's engine? umm yeah no comment,

by the way shifted, the sleeper, no turbo under the hood look, simpily hot!

and wut wires? lol

Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 8:19 PM
Joke's on him though, thats just how I brought it home (the day I brought it home actually) from the install. Its incredibly different and very clean, and still has a long way to go yet, but I have been working so its hard to get time to work on it.

I also just purchased a CF hood, and getting ready to get my 03 drift kit on and painted, along with the projector 03+ headlights and a complete new interior look.





4cyltuner.com - Information Source For 4 Cylinder Tuners
Buy stuff from CarCustoms Ebay! Won't be disappointed!

Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 10:28 PM
dont know how it gets cleaner, but ok lol


keep it up man, ur definatly one of the nicest engine set ups
Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Saturday, February 04, 2006 11:20 PM
HO manifold = better design, better flow/ less resistence on the incoming air being taken in........ I fail to see how the plastic manifold is better.. gains are proven are they not...



My Cav
I give up...
i'm buying a VW those people love trees, so they should love eachother too... "Andy"
Re: 2.3 H.O intake man..Vs 2.4 plastick intake ma
Sunday, February 05, 2006 12:11 AM
justin knieriem wrote:you guys are gay neways WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The plastic is better then the aluminum 2.3 manifold nomatter how you put it plastick is better then aluminum sorry and if this is the wrong thread u guys must be gay considering that you swith them for performance which this forum is performance. go back to school and get a diploma u drop outs!!


The advantages of the HO manifold are not its heat resistance, although with the spacer flange, which most people use for the swap, there is no transfer of heat from the head to the manifold since the flange eliminates it. The key advantage of the HO manifold is the increase airflow it provides compared to the stock 2.4 manifold (the HO manifold performance capabilities aren’t based on what material it is made of, but its design.)






Click the banner to enter the best Quad4 & Twin Cam site on the internet.
Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search