I have 2 part numbers H95952 and H95956. The first number is the part # to the 95-97 2.2, which is a 4-2-1 style.....the 2nd part # is to the 98-02 2.2 and it has a more 4-1 style. I have heard contraversy before on the port difference between the 2 different heads. but i also have seen supporting evidence that a header for the 97 can be used just the same on the 98 is this true???

I think they fit, but you may have a hard time getting the gasket to seal.

Why do you want to know? A 4-2-1 and a 4-1 aren't going to make any difference in output on a 2.2l (at least a noticable one). I think you should get the one made for your year.

The only actual differanc ein Power oer say, will be where the torque curve and HP curve is.






“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that’s even remotely true."

i have the obx 4-2-1 on my 01 2.2 (2200). It fits just fine.

I know that the 4-2-1 is for more low end tq and hp, versus the 4-1 style which is more high end. I was curious cause im looking at the 4-2-1 style but I have a 2200 motor but if grillrd is using the 4-2-1 set up on a 2200 I should be fine....thanks

You have to be really careful getting the header gasket to seal correctly. And the ports don't match up 100% perfect, but it's close enough and it will still give you gains. I would go with the 4-2-1 header. I like the gains I got from mine and the o2 sensor stays in the same spot, no having to relocate and extend it.




I was a retard, and now I'm permanently banned.

and your o2 sensor only reads 2 cylinders also


which is not good , and why pacesetter changed theirs


the long tube 4-1 is as good as the 4-2-1 header

I'm glad they finally changed their design. I still like the low end torque gains from the shortie header as opposed to the longube.




I was a retard, and now I'm permanently banned.