2200 howell valves springs - Performance Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
2200 howell valves springs
Thursday, June 21, 2007 7:58 PM
anyone know any updates about the howell springs they were thinkin about doing for the 2200 engine?

Re: 2200 howell valves springs
Thursday, June 21, 2007 9:13 PM
It won't happen, there's no demand. Why do you need aftermarket springs?



fortune cookie say:
better a delay than a disaster.
Re: 2200 howell valves springs
Thursday, June 21, 2007 9:45 PM
Quote:

t won't happen, there's no demand.

Seems like there's only a handful of people doing anything with the poor OHV engine, and with the 2.2 / 2200 differences it splits the demand among even more parts.

Hmmm... anyone here know of any good projects going on in the S10 world? I know the lowly OHV engine is showing up more and more in roundy round car events but most of those engines have to remain close to stock.

-->Slow
Re: 2200 howell valves springs
Thursday, June 21, 2007 9:50 PM
just seeing if theres any available for a possible crazy na build with a radical cam
Re: 2200 howell valves springs
Friday, June 22, 2007 2:40 AM
It's me again...

Slow, I've heard your question and the only info I have is on my own. I want to do the narrow-body rocker mod but don't know what all I'll need. This will be in conjunction with the stock cam. Reason? When I was young an uncle had a '72 3/4-ton G-series chevy Sportsvan w/ Energizer cam & Holley Economaster carb added to the 4-bolt 5.7L V-8, nothing else. The result was a single-pipe van that more than got out of it's own way, and easily made way for others! Got good mileage to boot. Anyway, I figure if I up the lift with the stock cam, my low-end will increase just enough to do the same. Maybe with less pedal. Also, thoughts of putting the underloved LN2 in a GM T-body have run through my mind lately. Hey, the chassis is rally proven, it's suspension design is used in the front of the '84-'87 Fiero & the rear of the '82-'92 F-body, it's RWD, it used the T-5 from the S&T-series trucks, and it weighs only 2125lbs. I've heard stories of beemer-beating glory from other drivers on track "driver-instruction" day, have personally lost a state trooper in one, and have literally drove the same base-model issue up a wall and off a cliff with no ill-effects. So, with this engine and car combo, and the right gear out-back, doesn't this sound like an low-cost, efficient ego-crushing joyride?

Go beyond the "bolt-on".
Re: 2200 howell valves springs
Friday, June 22, 2007 2:48 AM
Oh yeah, there are also tons of odd brake, chassis & suspension mods that have been & can be done successfully done on various enthusiast web sights out there. Look and see!

Go beyond the "bolt-on".
Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search