them biotchs!
2nd place is the 1st loser
@!#$ this freedom. all the "American Freedom" bull@!#$ is mostly propaganda anyway.
Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.
You could bet your sweet ass that if anyone EVER tried to take my property without my consent, they'd be met at the door with a shotgun blast to the face. And no, I'm not kidding.
Currently #4 in Ecotec Forced Induction horsepower ratings. 505.8 WHP 414WTQ!!!
Currently 3rd quickest Ecotec on the .org - 10.949 @ 131.50 MPH!!!
Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.
Roofy wrote:You could bet your sweet ass that if anyone EVER tried to take my property without my consent, they'd be met at the door with a shotgun blast to the face. And no, I'm not kidding.
I think that I can agree with that 200%! I'd be more than willing to stand right there with ya friend!
"Speak the truth, and leave immediately after"
"The urge to save Humanity is almost ALWAYS a false front for the urge to rule"
"He who knoweth things as they are and not as they are said or seem to be, he truly is wise, and is taught of God more than of men."
LOL at GAM...you do realize it was the liberals who voted yes for this and the GOP that voted NAY!!!
i wonder, aside from the name of the government type, what the real differences between america under english rule and america now are?
give it 25 years and our fore-fathers will be turning over, again, in their graves.
GAM - As much as I hate Bush and as much as I usually agree with you, you can't put this one on Bush. The Supreme Court ruled on it, it has nothing to do with Bush or his cronies.
Besides, I don't know which Canadian party you support, but the Liberals have tried this sh!t in the past but weren't completely successful.
This is a very sad state of affairs for you Americans though. Land of the free? Yeah right.
There is nothing free about the US anymore and it's getting worse by the day. There are many countries around the world that are much more free than the US.
Pret: I realise that, but it was meant to be gag. extricate the digit from your anal canal and settle down.
Find out which company brought the issue to the court (this is a matter of constituional law so it had to go to the Supreme COURT.. not Congress or senate, unless there was an ammendment that passed recently with a 2/3s majority that I didn't hear of.. you still have the right to property and may not have that property removed without due process) and then check for their names on the policitical donor's list for the Repbulican party.
Shaner: I haven't read about that, but Expropriation act has been in effect since the turn of the century. After the land is expropriated, there is nothing saying that it must be returned to the original owner, or may not be sold off to the highest bidder. I think the act you're referring to was just trying to get around the expropriations act, which is a violation of CDN due process.
Which party I support is irrelevant since I can't rightly go in and crotch stomp the weasels if they back out of their election promises.
Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.
big business rules all
1989 Turbo Trans Am #82, 2007 Cobalt SS G85
Rodimus Prime wrote:big business rules all
Very true!
Corporations run this world, including Tobacco and Oil companies. Gotta love it.
lol sorry GAM sorry i could destinguish between your jokingly bashing of GWB and your nearly constant bashing of GWB!!!
Meh.. The funniest part is that I think it's an amazing joke... if you're in power.
Most of the presidents in the last 75 years haven't been worth casting a vote for, on the whole.
If you miss my humour, that's fine
I'm in forensics, not comedy anymore
.
Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.
this law has been effect since the 20's. Just never enforced is all. Plus it has to do with what they call Negative land. Meaning that mostly not used. You may see alot of that in inner cities with Boarded up buildings, like Detroit. It would be a blessing there. Just dont take that at face value.
JBP Built 2.4
250HP
230FT
Dont race
But dont push it
before it had to be for basicly public/government use, now it can be used to grant corporations dirt cheap land in which to develop for private for-profit business "to spur economic growth" [puke] [/puke]
I don't hate the government, I hate the @!#$s that don't vote.
i dont see how this is any different than before. They have always been able to seize your property under eminent domain, now they can do it for more reasons than one. They dont just take it and leave you on you ass. I mean yeah eminent domain sucks...but this is nothing new. Typically...they give you what your assesed for. For example, they took a famers field behind my house to extend the airport to allow jets to land. He tryed to sell it before, for 100k and it wouldnt sell, they paid him what the town had it assesed at. 375k dollars...
IM not saying this is right in any way..
^^ That's what I was thinking... they have to pay you for it. They can't just come kick you out, tear down your house, and say "Too bad!!".
<img src="http://www.student.ipfw.edu/~poolev01/misc/allyourbasesig.jpg">
^^ It's not that simple. More often than not, they don't compensate you what it's worth. They compensate you for what they think they can get away with.
---
This case is also a great example of why being partisan is for morons. I'm pretty liberal, but thank God for the conservative judges at the court that tried to prevent this. They failed, but there is hope one day it can be overturned. The margin was slim.
---
The assessed value is what you will get, but then again, it depends on the asessor.
My house has been assessed 3 times in the last 2 years, once by the city (2004), once by the woman who owned it (appraised in march 2004, which is basically the real value), and once by my own appraisor (2004 June)
I got 3 different numbers:
City: $121,000 (taxation purposes)
Her: $148,000 (approximated selling value)
Me: $139,000 (adjusted after house inspection).
All told, I bought for 140,000.
If some twit from city hall was going to expropriate my house for development, I would sue, and they could take my property over my dead body, especially if they were going to give me a pissant offering that's at least $30,000 less than what the selling value is.
If some corporate jack-off decided to buy my place, I should have right to REFUSE the purchase. No corporation should be allowed to run rough shod over the people just because there is prime land that I got to first and own. To be frank, that just stinks. There is enough land out there (that is already not owned or needs to be revitalised or redeveloped) that corporations can go and do what they need to.
I wonder what court case stemmed the decision?
Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.
Quote:
Most of the presidents in the last 75 years haven't been worth casting a vote for, on the whole.
This is obvious for anyone that has any cognitive though outsdie of themselves.
Anyhow, i look at it this way, if i owned land, and they were going to expropriiate it, it's very simple to landmine the land and say, "take it, but it's land-mined and I lost the map"
Goodbye Callisto & Skaši, Hello Ishara:
2022 Kia Stinger GT2 AWD
The only thing every single person from every single walk of life on earth can truly say
they have in common is that their country is run by a bunch of fargin iceholes.
then you'll have paul mccartney's wife out there trying to hop around and hit you with her prosthetic
