1, 2, 2.5 bar systems - Tuning Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
1, 2, 2.5 bar systems
Wednesday, March 17, 2010 9:13 PM
I was reading through different posts and was wondering if anyone could explain what the difference between the 1, 2, 2.5 bar systems and how they work. I just started getting into tuning and im doing some reading and being a computer science/ programmer i have a few cool ideas, but have to learn how our ecu runs.

Thanks

Re: 1, 2, 2.5 bar systems
Wednesday, March 17, 2010 11:12 PM
1 bar:
Perfect vacuum to atmospheric pressure - or - (-14.5psig(depending on altitude, can differ) to 0psig)

2 bar:
Perfect vacuum to 1 bar positive pressure - or - (-14.5psig(depending on altitude, can differ) to +14.5psig)

2.5bar:
Perfect vacuum to 1.5 bar positive pressure - or - (-14.5psig(depending on altitude, can differ) to +21.7psig)




"Never argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience!" -Anonymous

I don't need to be dead to donate my organ.
Re: 1, 2, 2.5 bar systems
Thursday, March 18, 2010 12:15 AM
michael cassatt wrote:I was reading through different posts and was wondering if anyone could explain what the difference between the 1, 2, 2.5 bar systems and how they work. I just started getting into tuning and im doing some reading and being a computer science/ programmer i have a few cool ideas, but have to learn how our ecu runs.

Thanks

Map sensors use a piezo crystal, that when pressure is applied to it, there is generated electric field and a subsequent voltage potential that is generated. Almost all map sensors read 0V to 5V for 0 to "x" bars of air pressure. If you want more information, you can read this post.....CLICK

There is a list of pressures and corresponding voltages for different map sensors.




I have no signiture
Re: 1, 2, 2.5 bar systems
Friday, March 19, 2010 5:36 AM
ok, so the a stock ecotec has a 1 bar system correct. So is there any way of making it a 2 bar or even a 2.5 bar, without doing the fake?
Re: 1, 2, 2.5 bar systems
Friday, March 19, 2010 8:16 AM
michael cassatt wrote:ok, so the a stock ecotec has a 1 bar system correct. So is there any way of making it a 2 bar or even a 2.5 bar, without doing the fake?
Yes, if you can get your hands on a ECO SC reflash PCM (its 2.5 bar), but the downside is you can't tune or modify it in any way as its locked out.





P&P Tuning
420.5whp / 359.8wtq

Re: 1, 2, 2.5 bar systems
Friday, March 19, 2010 8:54 AM
So, it doesnt have anything to do with how you measure the air? When is our ecu limited to a 1 bar when it is able to measure 2.5 with the reflash then?
Re: 1, 2, 2.5 bar systems
Friday, March 19, 2010 10:00 AM
michael cassatt wrote:So, it doesnt have anything to do with how you measure the air? When is our ecu limited to a 1 bar when it is able to measure 2.5 with the reflash then?

The reflash requires a new TMAP that reads up to 2.5 bar.




I have no signiture
Re: 1, 2, 2.5 bar systems
Friday, March 19, 2010 2:38 PM
How hard would it be to program the ecu to read a new sensor that can read a 2.5 bar, without getting the reflash?

Im good at programming so if i knew what language the reflash was in and what all they changes it makes, i could possibly write my own without locking the ecu to farther changes like the reflash does.

If anyone had this information it would be great.
Re: 1, 2, 2.5 bar systems
Friday, March 19, 2010 2:48 PM
Well, i dont know how... but frankly if you pulled that off and made it distributable... there are a lot of members on here who would cream their pants



Re: 1, 2, 2.5 bar systems
Friday, March 19, 2010 3:18 PM
I doubt anyone here even knows what processor the PCM uses. A programming language is simply a crutch to make life easier in turning instructions into assembly/machine code. Knowing the language the code is written in does you no good when you have no access to the source code itself. If I were to guess, though, they probably do a great deal of programming in both C AND assembly.

No offense, but without completely understanding the hardware you're working with, I highly doubt you will get anywhere with this. You would be better off like Ron and build your own PCM from scratch.




I have no signiture
Re: 1, 2, 2.5 bar systems
Saturday, March 20, 2010 6:18 PM
The type of processor in each unit probably varies by model, and by year, and possibly by options. Since GM is good at controlling costs and making everything the same.

I wouldn't doubt that the thing is written entirely in assembly.





i find it amusing that SHOoff has nothing better to do but follow me around & be an unhelpful dick in even cross-forum. - Jon Mick

Re: 1, 2, 2.5 bar systems
Sunday, March 21, 2010 3:37 PM
I highly doubt that they wrote the whole thing in assembly, if you have ever worked in assembly it takes forever and isn't very efficient. I'm finishing my second year of a programming major and we spent less than a week talking about assembly and most people cant even read it let alone program a cars ecu using it.

More than likely they used either C or C++.

Whalesac wrote:
No offense, but without completely understanding the hardware you're working with, I highly doubt you will get anywhere with this. You would be better off like Ron and build your own PCM from scratch.


Was that a pure race car or a daily driver?
Re: 1, 2, 2.5 bar systems
Sunday, March 21, 2010 5:34 PM
michael cassatt wrote:I highly doubt that they wrote the whole thing in assembly, if you have ever worked in assembly it takes forever and isn't very efficient. I'm finishing my second year of a programming major and we spent less than a week talking about assembly and most people cant even read it let alone program a cars ecu using it.

More than likely they used either C or C++.


That must be the difference between CS and Engineering. For the more complicated subroutines, it is likely that they use C, but for I/O implementation, assembly would be faster and more efficient than relying on the compiler. If you don't have any experience with DSP and are interested in this kind of stuff, I would reccommend taking a class or two on it first.

michael cassatt wrote:
Whalesac wrote:
No offense, but without completely understanding the hardware you're working with, I highly doubt you will get anywhere with this. You would be better off like Ron and build your own PCM from scratch.


Was that a pure race car or a daily driver?

I don't know if he ever finished it, but it was based off of Megasquirt hardware, yet was intended to be Plug-n-Play with the Jbody harness.




I have no signiture
Re: 1, 2, 2.5 bar systems
Monday, March 22, 2010 7:14 AM
michael cassatt wrote:ok, so the a stock ecotec has a 1 bar system correct. So is there any way of making it a 2 bar or even a 2.5 bar, without doing the fake?


You have only two ways of doing this....the fake where 0-5v = vacuum to 2.5bar instead of the vacuum to atm. it was, or the other way which is a reflash of the ECU. I'm sure trying to reprogram the factory PCM will not be possible without extensive info that I'm sure wont be had. I wish you all the luck....



"Never argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience!" -Anonymous

I don't need to be dead to donate my organ.
Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search