2.2L s10 vs mustang GT - Other Cars Forum
Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
ok not my cars but i know who owns the s10 and well....................
i was coming home from work tonight and i was driving behind a mustang Gt (new style the 06s or whatever) i could tell it was a manual and it have a mean exhaust tone so my guess it was lightly moded. Well then this s10 flys up my side and its my friend. They were pacing each other tell they got a light. light turns green and they take off, well the stang got a good jumb but my friend in the s10 jumps out by the end of his 1st gear and stayed infront of him till about 90 or thats what i stopped at my friend told me (and as far as i could tell) had him by about a full car length
good kill for the s10 i think
btw mods for his s10:
custom intercooled turbo kit at 6 psi
full 3 inch exhaust
stage 3 clutch
8 lb flyweel
some better cam i dont know what brand
pully set
copper head gasket
msd
and i know theres more
he said he can take like 15 lb of boost safely he would have beat the stang by way more if he didnt have a MBC lol
what do you guys think
btw do any of you know what a stock s10 2.2l 5 speed does in the 1/4
sorry for the repeat posts
idk about quarter mile, but a 2.2L 5-speed s-10's; 0-60 time is: 8.8.
and we all know the stang gets there quicker stock.
nice kill for the s-10 though, no doubt. and i wanna say 5-speed stangs are around the mid to high 13's mark. < not 100% on that.
LSportin', 2 door, 5-speed, ecotec, and its in ultra silver metallic.
^ my cavy of course.
02 redbadged wrote:idk about quarter mile, but a 2.2L 5-speed s-10's; 0-60 time is: 8.8.
and we all know the stang gets there quicker stock.
nice kill for the s-10 though, no doubt. and i wanna say 5-speed stangs are around the mid to high 13's mark. < not 100% on that.
they run mid 17's. i have a fard time beliveing that only 6lbs of boost drops 4 seconds of the quater mile time.
like i said he has a lot done and most of it i didnt list cause it was long but it happend
it was cool lol
so a truck that takes 8.8 seconds to get to 60 can beat an 05 or 06 that you assume is slightly modded that does 0-60 in 4.8 seconds, hmmmm.
the stang probably wasnt even modified, if it was, your looking at a 12 second car, I would be willing to bet that even with that turbo, the truck will run no faster than a 15.8 at the track. MSD ignitions do NOT increase HP. How can electricity increase it if its not doing a better job of moving air through the motor? If i had to guess the mods on the stang, they would be flowmaster, 40s with an X pipe, CAI, maybe a set of 4.10 gears. those are the basic mods any person does to a stang to start, the 05, that would be low 12s.
I'm not so sure I'd discount an 05 GT hitting 12s with basic mods. Probably not low 12s with the mods he mentioned, but I'd be willing to bet that high 12s are possible. Motor trend got a stock 05 to run 13.5 in the 1/4. Throw slicks on it (IF MT didn't do that already in their tests) with a decent driver and it's low 13s. Bolt-ons and gears and high 12s are, in theory, possible. I know that putting 4:10s in my old GT made an enormous improvement in my ETs (several tenths), as did throwing on a set of slicks at the track.
What I'm trying to figure out is how the S-10 got enough traction in that race? There's no weight in the back end, and it probably doesn't even have a posi dif.
it could have been.................you know how when you get excited when you beat something awsome you tend to exagerate meybe he was running higer boost but i know with his mods he runs like high 13s (i saw the pass he made at kaukanna dragway) and he sure does have a lot of mods
msd improves throttle response and maybe a little peppier top end and im not just saying that cause i read it on msds website they dont garauntee horsepower so i dont expect any from end result
he does have a posi locker with like goodyear drag radials lol im sure there illegal to have on the road cause the tires have like 3 tread lines and im not sure on the size but they are really fat lol
It says on the dyno slip in your profile (given we are talking about the same truck) that its a '98 S-10 with the 4.3l V6 (262cid) putting 278.5hp and 310.2ft lbs to the ground.
if it ain't broke...MAKE IT GO FASTER
well here is a dyno run that he dug up and btw this is a 10psi hope this helps
well for some reason it wont let me post the pic so if you wanna see the dyno sheet I uploaded it to my account so click my name and then click on my car and you will see it
and here is a link to see him take off in his truck btw its a really quiet bov
http://www.dragtruk.com/PICS/GA96226MP6N31.mpg
hope that helps clear it up lol
hahaha go figure i thought his truck was a 2.2 @!#$ me then
05 GTs are actually low 13s stock with the auto and low to mid 13s with the stick.
Andrew Bylicki wrote:05 GTs are actually low 13s stock with the auto and low to mid 13s with the stick.
You are VERY miss-informed.
1995 MTX SHO
http://axiscycle.com/slowsho<---My Video Page
allright, ill believe all the ricers instead of the guy who actually owns a stang and visits mustang sites regualy, and can read.
Andrew Bylicki wrote:allright, ill believe all the ricers instead of the guy who actually owns a stang and visits mustang sites regualy, and can read.
Stang fanboi's are worse than ricers...
1995 MTX SHO
http://axiscycle.com/slowsho<---My Video Page
05 stangs are mid to high 13 second cars stock. With the mods listed above, you are looking at a 13.0 car on street tires. def. capable of dipping into the 12s w/drag radials, or slicks. high 17s stock......you would have to knock almost 5 seconds off of that time.
Sooo close to 11s.....And so far away w/the j-body. The project begins
Leonard Sklaney wrote:05 stangs are mid to high 13 second cars stock. With the mods listed above, you are looking at a 13.0 car on street tires. def. capable of dipping into the 12s w/drag radials, or slicks. high 17s stock......you would have to knock almost 5 seconds off of that time.
yeah but like stated above
HE HAS A V6
but @!#$ him what a lier
yes, but also, how many of you started drivng just when you got your license or permit? also, ive been around cars since was 5. I probably know alot more about cars than some of the older people on here.
SLoW SHO wrote:Andrew Bylicki wrote:allright, ill believe all the ricers instead of the guy who actually owns a stang and visits mustang sites regualy, and can read.
Stang fanboi's are worse than ricers...
thats ur $.02, im a fan of stangs, and not at all a GM fan.
Andrew Bylicki wrote:yes, but also, how many of you started drivng just when you got your license or permit? also, ive been around cars since was 5. I probably know alot more about cars than some of the older people on here.
just the fact that you said the auto was faster than the manual shows how little you know
15.891 @ 88 mph stock, still getting @!#$ty launches...
...if you are not a fan of gm, what are you doing here? just curious..
..and ive never heard of a factory auto being faster than a factory stick. if you are so certain, post the link. sure, with some sort of racing 3-speed auto (i.e.powerglide? i dont remember the tranny name),, it can be faster than factory stick, but a facotry auto? doubt it.
...don't hate!.. respect people that have talent, even if it is in something you don't like or understand.
Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
