cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend - Other Cars Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 7:14 PM
well just picked it up today
if i had a scanner i would hook you up
sorry




Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 7:17 PM
hmm i might have to get this....id imagie the srt-4 wining in most catagories but i bet the cobalt prob out handles it



Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 7:17 PM
I heard something about it.

Like if you had the decision in real life......to pick the Cobalt SS.

But if you were playing a video game......pick the SRT-4.



Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 7:19 PM
Whats a cobolt?



YEAH I WENT PREMIUM. SO BITE ME!
Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 7:24 PM
cobolt wins overall
due to faster track times and better decleration and such
srt-4 and bolt get near identical 1/4 time
cobolt 14.4@99.3 0--60 6.1
srt-4 14.4@100.8 0-60 6.0
both engines green

also talks of future gm performance mods to come out later this year

cobolt ss needs rear swaybar also according to them

pretty good read



Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 7:26 PM
yea i read that today while i was in borders, i still dont get how they ran the same times, 235 hp vs 205 but cool they favored in the cobalts direction. The cobalt is sounding like a better car everytime its mentioned.




Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 7:31 PM
cobolt revs faster
better tires

also the dodge motor was under 5k miles so one would assume they both are
they just mention the dodge because its half a click of the two others they tested



Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 7:41 PM
that magazine sucks if they put an srt4 at 14.4, and cobAlt at 14.4 also. if the car really runs that then i am impressed. but no doubt the srt has more potential on stock turbo than cobalt does on sc, and how many people really get around to upgrading?? like 2%.
Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 7:44 PM
kyle stfu

i explained the 14.4



Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 7:46 PM
LOL no you didnt, you cant even spell the car right, your pathedic.
Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 7:51 PM
theL61 wrote:cobolt wins overall
due to faster track times and better decleration and such
srt-4 and bolt get near identical 1/4 time
cobolt 14.4@99.3 0--60 6.1
srt-4 14.4@100.8 0-60 6.0
both engines green
also talks of future gm performance mods to come out later this year

cobolt ss needs rear swaybar also according to them

pretty good read


so i had a typo
what does that have to do w/ the article? grow up




Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 7:52 PM
cobalt. happy kyle?


<img src="http://registry.gmenthusiast.com/images/jiggaman/personal_pic.jpg">
Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 7:57 PM
The guy had a typo, how does that make him pathetic?

Wait - thats right, you were the loser that got flamed in the other Cobalt thread for talking out of your ass. Looks like your at it again...

And as L61 said, the reason the SRT-4 ran a 14.4 @ 100MPH was because the car wasn't completely broken in yet. Of course the first thing out of your mouth it "that magazine sucks" - real intelligent comment..

If the SRT-4 was broken in, I'm sure it would have ran about a 14.0-14.2 at about 102MPH, like most do. Of course the Cobalt wasn't broken in either, so it was at a similar disadvantage. Overall though the numbers seemed pretty accurate - definitely a nice review.






My CarDomain Page
Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 8:01 PM
Z-unit wrote:yea i read that today while i was in borders, i still dont get how they ran the same times, 235 hp vs 205 but cool they favored in the cobalts direction. The cobalt is sounding like a better car everytime its mentioned.


most redlines and cobalts are dynoing at around 211-215 whp, so that makes them 235 - 240 crank as well



LE61T PTE6262 Powered

Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 8:02 PM
Kyle Kurtz wrote:LOL no you didnt, you cant even spell the car right, your pathedic.


and you just spelled PATHETIC wrong you dip@!#$



Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 8:03 PM
I saw a review on motoring 2005 that said the Cobalt ss superchaged was "funner" that the SRT4, a little slower but still a better drive.



AmazingJay
Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 8:10 PM
forgot to mention
the cobalt runs on regular
srt-4 premium



Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 8:20 PM
^^^ That is nice to know with the way gas prices are. that is one thing that would make me concider a Cobalt over the SRT-4.



YEAH I WENT PREMIUM. SO BITE ME!
Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 8:27 PM
theL61 wrote:forgot to mention
the cobalt runs on regular
srt-4 premium


it runs on regular? weird. What is the compression ratio of the cobalt?
Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 8:28 PM
definetely a good forum, glad to hear that.... I was considering the 2, but must go into further investigation.......... im aiming towards the SS
Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 8:29 PM
Yea im gonna have to favor the cobalt in this one, and once the so called "stage kits" are out like dodges kits, the cobalt will be capable of ..........well im not gonna put numbers cuz i dont know but lets just say it will impress us.






Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 8:35 PM
crackajax wrote:it runs on regular? weird. What is the compression ratio of the cobalt?


Yep, it can run on regular just fine. The compression ratio is 9.5:1, but you have to remember that its also supercharged, which increases the amount of air in each combustion cycle - therefore it is actually higher than 9.5:1 when F/I is factored in.

GM recommends that you use premium (91+) octane fuel, however, it is not necessarily required. The trade-off is a "power loss that can be noticably felt by the driver" when 87 octane is used

As for the SRT-4, I believe it only runs on premium fuel, no exceptions.





My CarDomain Page
Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 8:46 PM
Meckster (The Angered One) wrote:
Kyle Kurtz wrote:LOL no you didnt, you cant even spell the car right, your pathedic.


and you just spelled PATHETIC wrong you dip@!#$


PWNED!!!!!



Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 8:53 PM
wesmanw02 wrote:The guy had a typo, how does that make him pathetic?

Wait - thats right, you were the loser that got flamed in the other Cobalt thread for talking out of your ass. Looks like your at it again...

And as L61 said, the reason the SRT-4 ran a 14.4 @ 100MPH was because the car wasn't completely broken in yet. Of course the first thing out of your mouth it "that magazine sucks" - real intelligent comment..

If the SRT-4 was broken in, I'm sure it would have ran about a 14.0-14.2 at about 102MPH, like most do. Of course the Cobalt wasn't broken in either, so it was at a similar disadvantage. Overall though the numbers seemed pretty accurate - definitely a nice review.


wes kyle has a thing for starting crap in general.. hes one of those know it alls that doesnt know crap about cars im amazed that they would give him a license.



"Theres a time in every mans life where he hits a cross roads and...wait...are you wearing panties?"
AZ-JBO
Re: cobolt vs srt-4 in motortrend
Sunday, April 03, 2005 9:19 PM
i wouldnt reccomend using the regular gas. you'd probably get some bad knock, which can be pretty bad for an engine. i've heard of some GTP's seriously hurting their internals, and their compression ratio is only somewhere around 8 : 1. thought i dont know how much boost the cobalt is putting in there. just my $.02


Andy

it's not how fast you go, it's how you get there that counts.
ZZP XP cam, 1.6 rockers, 105# springs, speedbuilt FWI, 3.3" modular pulley, TOG headers,
3" exhaust, flomatched injectors
'97 GTP 14.06@100.6mph pre cam w/ 3.5" pulley, I/E
Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search