Malibu Rated #1 in Initial Quality - Other Cars Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
Malibu Rated #1 in Initial Quality
Thursday, June 05, 2008 9:27 AM

Re: Malibu Rated #1 in Initial Quality
Thursday, June 05, 2008 11:13 AM
good stuff!





Re: Malibu Rated #1 in Initial Quality
Thursday, June 05, 2008 11:51 AM
So GM takes it with the Grand Prix and the Malibu, that's cool. Also cool to see that Honda takes it for Sub compact and compact (Where's the Cobalt? oh that's right.. )




Quote:

Watching you parade around my bedroom in a thong was a little like watching sea lions mate.

Re: Malibu Rated #1 in Initial Quality
Thursday, June 05, 2008 4:11 PM
thought the G8 replaced the grandprix for 08



Re: Malibu Rated #1 in Initial Quality
Thursday, June 05, 2008 4:20 PM
Ill take a Mazda 3 over a Civic annnyy day



My Cav
I give up...
i'm buying a VW those people love trees, so they should love eachother too... "Andy"
Re: Malibu Rated #1 in Initial Quality
Thursday, June 05, 2008 5:14 PM
Funny thing: GM makes # 1 in JD power initial quality... where do you have to go to find out? JD Power..

Toyota, Honda, Kia, Hyundai etc. takes the same category? They shout it from the roof tops.





Re: Malibu Rated #1 in Initial Quality
Thursday, June 05, 2008 5:17 PM
"Initial Quality" is such a lame way to rate a car. All it means is that the car "seems" to be made very well. So it's all about the illusion of quality. Never mind if the thing falls apart in 2 years. I've never trusted that rating.
Re: Malibu Rated #1 in Initial Quality
Thursday, June 05, 2008 6:57 PM
GAM (The Kilted One) wrote:Funny thing: GM makes # 1 in JD power initial quality... where do you have to go to find out? JD Power..

Toyota, Honda, Kia, Hyundai etc. takes the same category? They shout it from the roof tops.


Who is to blame?

GM.





Re: Malibu Rated #1 in Initial Quality
Thursday, June 05, 2008 8:16 PM
Knoxfire wrote:"Initial Quality" is such a lame way to rate a car. All it means is that the car "seems" to be made very well. So it's all about the illusion of quality. Never mind if the thing falls apart in 2 years. I've never trusted that rating.


Being that they know their own reputation on creaks and rattles, they are wise not to brag. Overal, GM cars are reliable transportation if not refined.





Re: Malibu Rated #1 in Initial Quality
Thursday, June 05, 2008 8:19 PM
initial quality has been a good indicator of overall quality during the length of ownership



Re: Malibu Rated #1 in Initial Quality
Friday, June 06, 2008 4:37 AM
Initial Quality =
This is a test of a new vehicle after 3 months of ownership.

BTW...





Link for each class category (scroll down)
http://www.jdpower.com/autos/articles/2008-Initial-Quality-Study-Results

J.D. Power and Associates Reports:
Overall Initial Quality Improves Considerably, with Gains Shared Across
Most Manufacturers


American Honda, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation and Toyota Motor Sales
Each Capture Three Initial Quality Model Awards

WESTLAKE VILLAGE, Calif.: 4 June 2008 — Initial quality in the automotive industry has improved significantly in 2008, with substantial gains demonstrated by nearly three-fourths of the 36 ranked nameplates, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2008 Initial Quality StudySM (IQS) released today. Overall quality improves to 118 problems per 100 vehicles (PP100) in 2008, down from 125 PP100 in 2007.

“Due to some strong new-vehicle launches, in addition to a continued reduction in the level of defects and malfunctions, overall quality improves by 6 percent in 2008, compared with 2007,” said David Sargent, vice president of automotive research at J.D. Power and Associates. “This gain is driven not only by strong advances from many of the high-volume brands such as Chevrolet, Ford and Toyota, but also by very significant improvements by many other automakers. This industry-wide improvement is a testament to the effort that automakers are putting into listening to the voice of the customer, and the hard work they have undertaken to integrate that feedback to design, engineer and manufacture better-quality vehicles. From working closely with the industry, we see the importance that is placed on initial quality. Vehicle manufacturers and consumers alike are reaping the rewards of this effort.”

The Initial Quality Study serves as the industry benchmark for new-vehicle quality measured at 90 days of ownership. The study is used extensively by vehicle manufacturers worldwide to help them design and build better vehicles and by consumers to help them in their vehicle purchase decisions. Initial quality has been shown over the years to be an excellent predictor of long-term durability, which can significantly impact consumer purchase decisions. The study captures problems experienced by owners in two distinct categories—quality of design and defects and malfunctions.

The study finds that 86 percent of the overall improvement is due to advances in eliminating defects and malfunctions. Minimizing design problems remains a major challenge for the industry, particularly since new technology, such as navigation and entertainment devices, is becoming increasingly common in today’s new vehicles.

“As consumer demand for new and more advanced wireless communication, navigation and audio technology continues to grow, manufacturers face challenges related to how well these systems are integrated into their vehicles,” said Sargent. “In particular, issues with difficult-to-use audio and entertainment controls and voice command recognition failure are among the top ten problems most frequently reported by customers. Since hands-free communication for drivers will become a mandate in more and more areas throughout the U.S., this will need to be an area of continued focus for automakers.”

The study also finds that new-vehicle sales patterns in 2008 have shifted away from the largest models and toward smaller models.

“This shift in sales preferences among new-vehicle buyers is in part a response to rapidly increasing fuel prices,” said Sargent. “The good news for consumers in this difficult environment is that they can downsize with confidence, as there are many models with high initial quality in the smaller-vehicle segments. J.D. Power and Associates forecasts that 28 new compact-vehicle models will launch by 2010, and it will be particularly important for manufacturers to ensure high initial quality in these launches.”

2008 IQS Ranking Highlights
Honda models capture three segment awards—more than any other nameplate in the 2008 study—for the Civic, CR-V and Fit. Garnering two segment awards each are: Chevrolet (Malibu and Silverado LD); Dodge (Dakota and Durango); Infiniti (EX-Series and M-Series); Lexus (LS and RX); and Mercedes-Benz (CLK-Class and E-Class). The Porsche 911 has the fewest quality problems in the industry, with just 67 problems per 100 vehicles. Also receiving segment awards are the Ford E-Series, Lincoln Navigator, Mazda MX-5 Miata, Pontiac Grand Prix Sedan and Toyota Sequoia.

“In past years, automakers have frequently struggled to achieve very high initial quality with new models,” said Sargent. “With product launches and redesigns often being problematic for manufacturers from a quality standpoint, it is particularly impressive that the Chevrolet Malibu and Infiniti EX-Series achieve such high levels of quality that they receive awards in their launch year.”

For a third consecutive year, Porsche tops the overall nameplate rankings, averaging 87 PP100. Following in the rankings are Infiniti (which improves from 9th rank position in 2007), Lexus, Mercedes-Benz and Toyota, respectively. Audi posts the largest improvement in ranking, moving from 26th place in 2007 to 10th in 2008.

“Porsche continues its steady improvement and has succeeded in distancing itself from the second-ranked nameplate to a greater degree in 2008—by a gap of 11 PP100—compared with 3 PP100 in 2007,” said Sargent.

Assembly Plant Awards
The Mercedes-Benz assembly plant in Sindelfingen, Germany, receives the Platinum Plant Quality Award for producing vehicles yielding the fewest defects and malfunctions. Averaging just 33 PP100, the plant produces the Mercedes-Benz CL-Class, CLS-Class, E-Class Sedan, E-Class Wagon and S-Class. Plant awards are based solely on defect and malfunction counts.

Among North and South American plants, the Toyota plant in Baja California, Mexico, which produces the Toyota Tacoma, achieves the Gold Plant Quality Award.

In the Asia Pacific region, Toyota’s Fujimatsu, Japan, plant, which produces the Toyota Prius, receives the Gold Plant Quality Award.

The 2008 Initial Quality Study is based on responses from more than 81,500 purchasers and lessees of new 2008 model-year cars and trucks surveyed after 90 days of ownership. The study is based on a 228-question battery designed to provide manufacturers with information to facilitate problem determination and drive product improvement. The study was fielded between February and April 2008



>>>For Sale? Clicky!<<<
-----The orginal Mr.Goodwrench on the JBO since 11/99-----


Re: Malibu Rated #1 in Initial Quality
Friday, June 06, 2008 2:21 PM
ROFL.. Look how low Saturn is.. Go figure. Also interesting that KIA ranks higher than GM? Oh man, no wonder GM is going bankrupt..




Quote:

Watching you parade around my bedroom in a thong was a little like watching sea lions mate.

Re: Malibu Rated #1 in Initial Quality
Friday, June 06, 2008 3:48 PM
Dodge Durango rated first of it's category and the Toyota Highlander last... Someone fu¢ked up, seriously.



Re: Malibu Rated #1 in Initial Quality
Friday, June 06, 2008 5:54 PM
lone_wolf wrote:ROFL.. Look how low Saturn is.. Go figure. Also interesting that KIA ranks higher than GM? Oh man, no wonder GM is going bankrupt..

Where do you get that? Saturn, GMC, and Hummer are below Kia, but Chevrolet, Pontiac, Buick, and Cadillac are still ahead and above average.





Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search