iLL TAKE THE RIMS OFF THAT THING.....
ECOTEC now with Maximum Bolt-Ons!!
Damn, can you say nooo trunk space? lol
~2014 New Z under the knife, same heart different body~
______________________
WHITECAVY no more
2012 numbers - 4SPD AUTOMATIC!!
328 HP
306 TQ
Instrument Panel looks like it came off a Mazda3
i just threw up a little
"Custom cars, custom problems."-me
It looks better than the old one.. But still pretty ugly...
Red 2005 Saturn Ion-3 Coupe
Burgundy 2006 Saturn Ion - sold
gross... i loved the 1st gen sebrings, my parents have a 99 jxi limited convert. pretty fun car.
are these going to be sedans only?
Check out my build thread!
Just When You Think Chrysler Design Is On A Roll, They Make A Boring Looking Car Of Epic Scale.
<~~~~PWN3D!!
Does it come with a Hemi?
lol..
Red 2005 Saturn Ion-3 Coupe
Burgundy 2006 Saturn Ion - sold
I had 2005 V6 sebring as a rental and hated every minute with it.
This doesn't look much better, hopefully it drives better it certainly couldn't drive much worse.
Looks a little Crossfireish in the front.
But the crossfire didn't sell... hummm...
www.drluc.ca
Luc Sipkema wrote:Looks a little Crossfireish in the front.
But the crossfire didn't sell... hummm...
Why would you buy a chrysler when you could have the same thing badged as a mercedes benz.
And wtf is up with chrysler and lines in the hood. looks stupid. Also the rear doesn't match the front.
Why? Because one POS costs around $26K (advertised) and the other POS when new was about $42K (previous) SLK. And for the smart consumer, the consumer will get what is better on the wallet, not what marque it has.
Besides it is a hard top. Now if it was convertible, rather have SLK's hard-top convertible instead of Crossfire's soft-top.
And quite frankly I prefer the 95-00 Chrysler mid-size. Those design were so ahead of its time, that replacements for them only go downhill. I swear, ever since Mercedes bought Chrysler, Benz has been slowly killing Chrysler Motor Company.
>>>For Sale? Clicky!<<<
-----The orginal Mr.Goodwrench on the JBO since 11/99-----
Mr.Goodwrench-G.T. wrote:^For now yes.
See a trend?
I was going to say it looked like a Saturn got a Benz (trophy wife) pregnant and had that thing. The C-Pillars to the trunk scream Saturn. The wheels look like they are taken from Ford's Lincoln assembly line.
I thought they were killing off the Seabring anyway, wtf.
Team GREEN
Suspension Division - "Handling Before Horsepower"
Making the turns since 1999
1998 EK Civic Hatch - Yes, it's a Honda.
the base 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine, rated at 172 hp. Optional engines are a 190-hp, 2.7-liter V-6 and 235-hp, 3.5-liter V-6. The 3.5-liter engine is mated to a six-speed automatic transmission
so its a chyrsler eclipse?
-Borsty
IMO, the biggest mistakes are not going with a pillarless side window design, the door lines in the roof just look funky, and the rear end is too chunky, theres not enough there to balance out the design.
On the plus side, it's the first new Chrysler product to come out in a while that dosn't have the truck front end on it. I'm all for brand identity, but the whole "truck look on cars" thing is getting rediculous.
Currently #4 in Ecotec Forced Induction horsepower ratings. 505.8 WHP 414WTQ!!!
Currently 3rd quickest Ecotec on the .org - 10.949 @ 131.50 MPH!!!
Quote:
See a trend?
I was going to say before you mentioned it; What's up with everybody copying the Ion's profile?
Another example:
Aren't there laws against this sort of thing?
"i promise we won't get drunk, and go out in boat in the dark, stand up in the boat and fire the gun into the air unless we have life jackets on."
^^ Those pics are to show the headlights, not the rest of the car. It's the Acura CSX (Canada only), for anyone who's wondering.
Quote:
I swear, ever since Mercedes bought Chrysler, Benz has been slowly killing Chrysler Motor Company.
Be careful there; true as it may be, those words are sacrilege to some people
"i promise we won't get drunk, and go out in boat in the dark, stand up in the boat and fire the gun into the air unless we have life jackets on."
WTF were the designers thinking. If Benz wants to kill off Chrysler thats a good start since they probably won't sell too many of them.
I like it. It looks much better than the boring pile they have out now
Borsty wrote:the base 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine, rated at 172 hp. Optional engines are a 190-hp, 2.7-liter V-6 and 235-hp, 3.5-liter V-6. The 3.5-liter engine is mated to a six-speed automatic transmission
so its a chyrsler eclipse?
Hasn't it been pretty much a Chrysler eclipse from the start?
But it is definately ugly.
The only Sebring that I ever thought looked OK was this one:
man why did they change the design like that the old one was 10x better...o well
