a easier solution to the top feed conversion? - Boost Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:38 AM
i was looking at this site port fueler
and was wondering how feasible a setup like this would be to use bigger injectors. a spacer plate with injectors right in the top of it. i don't think it would cause to many problems with boost because of the shear velocity of the air getting into the engine. i dunno. any thoughts?

http://www.helpelijah.com

Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:00 PM
You might as well just switch to top feed, it'd be less complicated. That is the same as any other extra injector controller. Not to mention, getting the stupid intake mani off the back of the head (while still in-car) is possibly the hardest operation on the LN2...do you really want more junk back there?



fortune cookie say:
better a delay than a disaster.
Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:11 PM
lol. don't i know it. just throwing ideas out there. also check out these. bigger sidefed injectors! don't know if they would fit though. they are out of the 180sx turbo engines.

heavythrottle.com has them and searched up 213, s14, s15 on ebay and found them. known as SARD injectors. talked to hahn performance about them.

switching to top fed injectors is what i want to but instead of boring the current mainfold i figured that i could just make a plate and put top fed injectors in there.

http://www.helpelijah.com
Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:25 PM
I know that my price was steep, I can't blame you for doing it yourself!



Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:34 PM
Nissan injectors won't work. The only other injectors we can use are the massive Saturns like slowolej has (but they won't work on the stock ECU inj drivers). I have stuff to do a top-feed, but I don't want to have to run a spacer plate. Right now I'm thinking the Saturn injectors run off of MS would be the best idea.
stevefire wrote:I know that my price was steep, I can't blame you for doing it yourself!
I know Emry's cost was VERY low, lol.



fortune cookie say:
better a delay than a disaster.
Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:37 PM
yeah, and essentially it got the thumbs up from more people then mine.

I can only offer to make mine for people, whether or not they think my price is fair.. well, meh.

Its a lot of work compared to emry's, too.





Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:49 PM
oh i thought your price was pretty fair for parts and labor. trust trying to see my options out. i meant to message you back and let you know i still may be in touch. ;O)

http://www.helpelijah.com
Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:50 PM
well i am gonna be running ms, so what you are saying is i can get some saturn injectors in there then?

http://www.helpelijah.com
Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:50 PM
Yours looks purdy, and you didn't need the stupid spacer, but I just can't get over the injector angles...I know it won't make much of a difference (if any), just seems wrong lol. Out of curiosity, how much are you asking?



fortune cookie say:
better a delay than a disaster.
Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Thursday, May 25, 2006 1:47 PM
I'll message you, I dont really need to advertise, as I'm not wanting to make this into anything large scale. (way too much time)



Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Thursday, May 25, 2006 1:59 PM
Sean McAfee wrote:well i am gonna be running ms, so what you are saying is i can get some saturn injectors in there then?
Yeah, there were some old Saturn throttle body injectors that fit into our stock ports, but they were 42# or something. Run a search and you'll find the info slowolej posted a few times.



fortune cookie say:
better a delay than a disaster.

Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:12 PM
Merry Christmas, here's the thread.



fortune cookie say:
better a delay than a disaster.
Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Thursday, May 25, 2006 5:37 PM
thanks for the link. i searched a little bit but didn't come up with what saturn exactly the injectors were from? anyone know?

http://www.helpelijah.com
Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:08 PM
Quote:

i searched a little bit but didn't come up with what saturn exactly the injectors were from? anyone know?


I'd guess a throttle body injected one would be a good start.

91-94 SOHC 1.9L SL series. You need to find 4 of these. They're also available from Holley's web site as #42/hr units, or you can look up injectors from a 95-96 Chev van w/454 and those are also the same size (no kidding!)

Honestly, it may be possible to find some smaller ones if you get into the medium duty truck applications. I'd think a 366 truck engine (very low HP) would have smaller injectors than a 454.

I actually have some injectors that are even more massive if someone wants to take a crack at them. They're rated at 62 lbs/hr @ 30.5 psi fuel pressure. I have 3 of 4 needed, brand new in boxes.

Notec- why no spacer?

-->Slow
Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Thursday, May 25, 2006 9:56 PM
My whole setup cost $200. But that was because i knew a guy that owned a CNC machine and worked in a machines shop, and came in on the weekend and did it as a favor to me for like $100. I added another 100 to the total for the 2200 fuel rail, and the associated injectors (ebayed $45) hoses, and fittings($50) at most. Now, I did buy an adjustable fuel pressure regulator. That is not necessarily needed as part of the top feed conversion. So, i'm not including that, but that was $130 in case your wondering.



Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Friday, May 26, 2006 3:07 AM
slowolej: thanks man i wlll start looking for those.

VTLoki: do have the injectors pointing straight down or at a slight angle?

i want to take a moment to say thanks for everyone for their incredible amount of help so far!

http://www.helpelijah.com
Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Friday, May 26, 2006 4:18 AM
Jeff's top feed is a work of art. It really turned out awesome. Its also one of the best looking 2200 fuel rail conversions I've seen to date.

The injectors are angled right at the valve, as they should be.





Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Friday, May 26, 2006 4:43 AM
I looked around last night and found that the 366 and 427 powered trucks take the same size injectors. The injector top is red instead of black, so there's probably something different in terms of spray angle or pattern, but I wouldn't be worried about it. The Saturn injectors don't show up when you're looking for rebuilt injectors, but I did a search for 366 tbi injector and I found a place selling reman ones for $35 plus a $35 core. I dunno which site it was, sorry.

I started working on a top feed several months ago. The conversion can be done fairly easily with some planning. I plan to use the steel 2200 fuel rail to save on machining costs. The aluminum rail looks nice, but requires a fair amount of additional work imo. If I were to use aluminum I'd buy some unmachined fuel rail stock and build the rails from scratch.

I will say that the 52# / hr Saturn injectors are to very tough to tune. It would be easier to use a 30-38# injector for applications to about 10-12 psi imo. Too bad I haven't found any for the bottom feed rail.

-->Slow
Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Friday, May 26, 2006 4:58 AM
That port fueler thing is an awesome idea. Looks very sharp.



Cardomain|Myspace

Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Friday, May 26, 2006 6:00 AM
slowolej wrote:
Quote:

Notec- why no spacer?
That's a LOT of extra machining time, and I don't have the tools/$$$ for it. Also, I'm worried about the possibility of it making the plenum hit a strut tower bar.



fortune cookie say:
better a delay than a disaster.
Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Friday, May 26, 2006 6:37 AM
what about increasing the chance of a boost/vacuum leak?

You're creating another mating surface, one more spot to leak air... (just thinking outloud)




Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Friday, May 26, 2006 6:52 AM
Lol, I hear ya. I had that upper intake gasket blow out on a regular basis under boost



fortune cookie say:
better a delay than a disaster.
Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Friday, May 26, 2006 11:04 AM
what did you do to combat that?

At work we use thread and 315 loctite on our engine split lines, do you think that might work?

I guess not much replaces the convenience of a gasket.

In order to use thread you'd have to make sure both surfaces were 100% flat/smooth.





Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Friday, May 26, 2006 6:46 PM
I just replaced them until the engine blew lol.



fortune cookie say:
better a delay than a disaster.
Re: a easier solution to the top feed conversion?
Friday, May 26, 2006 9:21 PM
lol thats one way of doing it



Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search