2003 cavalier ecotec with 100hp wet nx kit 1.9 60ft..... 14.3 1/4 mile

ok?






09:f9:11:02:9d:74:e3:5b:d8:41:56:c5:63

i have a video but how wold i put it on here

putfile.com

photobucket.com

BUT....





to tell the truth you should be doing extremely better than a 14.3. Do you have a stock 03 and just threw some nitrous on and ran a 100shot?


N2O + Bolt-ons = 220Hp/250Tq

Coming Soon:HpTunersPro, EagleConnectingRods, WiescoPistons, 13sec2200

cookie?



Im a Xbox 360 fanboy...and damn proud of it!!

2004 cavalier ecotec 2.448 60ft..... 16.135 1/4 mile

Were your numbers from a track or from a g-tech? Just asking because timeslips have the time in to the thousandants and g-techs have them in the hundredths.

99redz24 wrote:cookie?

Yes please.



http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2265283

short ram thats it ... i ran it at the track thats where the video is from

Where is the video?



http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2265283

check out the video at http://www.putfile.com/abadasscav

Are you on bags? looks like it. If so that could be why your time was still in the 14's with a 100 shot. Good run tho. Mustang didnt have you by too much.

no im not on bags just lowered the cheapest way cut the springs and wlded them

^^^^not good to admit.

good looking run, you jumped off the line pretty good


-Brandon

uh... whats your track elevation? u pulled a 1.9 60ft? what kinda tires? trap speed?

darkstarts ran a 13.3 i believe with 100 shot with basic bolt ons like header and exhaust.... im pretty sure he was letting off as well so he wouldnt hit the 108 limiter.....

i have no clue what track elevation is the track is in pittsburgh... my tires were hankook hrII ventus.... my speed was 92

Quote:

2003 cavalier ecotec with 100hp wet nx kit 1.9 60ft..... 14.3 1/4 mile

Quote:

my tires were hankook hrII ventus.... my speed was 92

something doesnt seem right... 92mph is a low 15 trap speed.. and if u pulled a 1.9 60ft. it shoudl be alot higher. specially with 100 shot.

frank hart wrote:no im not on bags just lowered the cheapest way cut the springs and wlded them

you should fix that right away



Im a Xbox 360 fanboy...and damn proud of it!!

quickness gets u lower times not all speed..well the video shows it plus when it shifted into drive it like died a lil.... the mustang i ran against ran a 13.5 at 79mph.

Quote:

something doesnt seem right... 92mph is a low 15 trap speed.. and if u pulled a 1.9 60ft. it shoudl be alot higher. specially with 100 shot

check out my new video when i run a 2.5 60ft.-15.2 1/4 at the same speed 92 http://media.putfile.com/03-cav-vs-STI--cav-spun-too-much

Something's not adding up about your car. I'll pass your times on a smaller engine and less of a shot? WITH THE SAME TIRES haha


N2O + Bolt-ons = 220Hp/250Tq

Coming Soon:HpTunersPro, EagleConnectingRods, WiescoPistons, 13sec2200

[quote=Th�f�stf�ngz]2004 cavalier ecotec 2.448 60ft..... 16.135 1/4 mile

Were your numbers from a track or from a g-tech? Just asking because timeslips have the time in to the thousandants and g-techs have them in the hundredths.

you should be a mid 15 i think, stock ecos can get even low 15's if you know how to drive (auto or manual) by launching correct and adjusting tire preasure.

do your exuast... 2.5 piping headers..... crank pulley, and a few other bolt ons and you could hit 12's.... MAYBE.



My Cav
I give up...
i'm buying a VW those people love trees, so they should love eachother too... "Andy"