Hi guys I was wondering if anybody has purchased this cam yet for the 2200 and how is it working for you? I am still in search of a cam for my car. It doesn't state any specs but wanted to get any imput possible from the OHV guys who might be running the cam in their car. I will be building the motor for boost but will be spraying the hell out of it untill i get all my turbo parts together.
For those who don't know: here is a link.
http://www.levelzeromotorsports.com/store/view_product.php?product=9
I also know that I can get a custom regrind form crane..I would prefur input on th LZM cam. Also i haven't sent LZM an email yet asking about the cam. I will be doing that next.
Thanks for any help-Jeff
I'd say find the specs and have it reground locally. I'd guess that's basically what they're doing since they have a core charge. I'm getting a regrind for one of my projects for about $200. You might also talk to MadJack or one of the other guys with a desktop dyno program. They might be willing to help you come up with a good profile.
imo i wouldnt purchase anything from a company that wont state specs, how the hell do you know if its going to be good for your combo or not... different engines with different builds like different cams...
just go to comp/crane and get a cam from them...
_______________________
** Flat Broke Racing Inc.**
MadJack wrote:
The stock CLs for the 2.2/2200's is 109*for the intake CL and the lobe separation is 114*(some debate here, some have been measured at 113*). This is not necessarily bad, for these CLs are good for maintaining a smooth idle, broad powerband and are good boosted and nitrous applications. The downside of these CLs is that they wont create the peek torque and horsepower figures that tighter lobe centers and earlier intake CL would create, at the expense of idle quality. A cam with tighter lobe centers (such as the IPP cams) will respond better on a N/A motor, but may trip a CEL or require tuning. Slightly higher compression will help here.
these were just some of the problems with the lzm cams for the eco (the "first" ones) being one of the fellas to install and tune them for a customer they were very poor grinds that had little thought. we ended up taking them out and i gave him a set of custom order cams and kept the lzm cams here, they're sitting in the scrap pile waiting to be taken away.
_______________________
** Flat Broke Racing Inc.**
Thanks for your guys input. Madjack that would be awsome if you took the time to make a list. Where did you get desktop dyno again? I might be better off playing with that to get the specs for my turbo cam.
I picked up dyno2000 off ebay for like $10. It's an older version, but does the same thing. However, it isn't very good at modeling boost, I don't think any of them are.
fortune cookie say:
better a delay than a disaster.
hmm thanks no tec.......I cant get a responce form LZM i sent 2 e mails and no response yet....oh well. Thanks again guys
OHV notec wrote:I picked up dyno2000 off ebay for like $10. It's an older version, but does the same thing. However, it isn't very good at modeling boost, I don't think any of them are.
I was just thinking about that this teh other day. It'd be nice if we could see what a particular cam might do under all motor conditions and also under boost. It's well known that different cam profiles are needed for a given build style, but for the sake of comparison, it'd be cool to see what the what the effect would be - good or bad - on a cam such as the one that Jack came up with a while back. I still have those specs written down somewhere...
remember to take the desktop dyno programs with a "grain" of salt so to speak. they are not very accurate, and to get them even remotely close you have to know very detailed information. however they are fairly accurate on where the HP/TQ peaks are in the power band givin XX cam, etc...
just an fyi for those that like to play around with these types of things.
_______________________
** Flat Broke Racing Inc.**