what do you guys think of this idea? - Performance Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
what do you guys think of this idea?
Wednesday, May 25, 2005 5:48 PM
I'm contemplating either getting a newer car my thoughts are either a 2001 celica gt-s 6 speed, a mitsu eclipse gsx or modding my cavy and hoping it holds together.

first what are your thoughts on the previous 2 cars?

second, if i mod the cavy, i've got a 2200 ohv motor, my hope is to find another motor on ebay or something, tear it down to bear block, have the crank knife edged and balanced and welded, add a set of esp rods, lower compression pistons, probably run something like 8.5 to 1 or 8 to 1 so i dont have to run high octane numbers to keep it together, bigger injectors, fuel management system, upgraded ignition system with timing control, and to top it all off a t3/t4 60 trim turbo with at least a 2.5 inch exhaust probably a 3 inch. now the goal with this car is to make something thats spirited to drive, i'd like to lay down around 200hp at the wheels have a quick spool up, and be reliable, engine and drive train, am i really stretching to pull that off with a cavy or is it possible without breaking the bank? i can do all the hard labor myself, the only thing i'll have to do is have the crank balanced and knife edged, the rest i can do myself or know friends that can do it. tell me which idea you guys like better right now i'm heavily leaning towards the celica

J~

Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Wednesday, May 25, 2005 6:16 PM
its not a stretch, but as with many people, most never follow through....


really the choice is yours... no one has reached the limit on any of these motors really yet... and anything is possible if you plan it out and not a fly by night effort.


and anything you get and mod the more power you put into it, the shorter the life will be... its a give and take once you start doubling and trippling power numbers.



Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Wednesday, May 25, 2005 7:36 PM
so your going to get a crank knife edged, balenced, and welded, if you are talking about the old school backyard stroker kit where you weld material to the crank and take material off the other side to stroke it, that is not to be used on anything but derby cars.

you have to go over all the angles, i can guarantee that your 2.2 cav. will have lower insurance than the other 2. but you really can't beat a 4G63 eclipse. or maybe a celica with the turbo 3S engine. the other 2 cars will have much more accessable power for less labor.



CAR GODS MADE THE 1.6 SOHC TO MAKE US 2.2 OHV GUYS FEEL BETTER.
Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Wednesday, May 25, 2005 7:57 PM
go with the eclipe IMO



maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow....... but some day
Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Wednesday, May 25, 2005 8:10 PM
if no mod cav. go with eclipse


-Brandon

Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Wednesday, May 25, 2005 8:17 PM
no i'm not going to stroke the crank, i'm going to remove material to allow it to rev freely, while reducing surface for oil to cling to, as well as lowering parasitic loss due to square edge crank journals slamming into oil in the pan at high speed, knife edgeing allows the crank to slice thru the oil more cleanly. my brothers one of the most acomplished welders you'd ever meet, the only thing hes not certified for is underwater welding, and its simply because no job has ever required it, and the welding i'm refering to is welding the pins in the crank so that the counter weights can't shift phase and cause massive lower end failure, it also prevents flex in the crank under high stress. this isnt shade tree 101 does anybody know a good forum for the celicas? i've been searching for days and cant find anything really useful, mostly boards catering to old school 80s and early 90s models.

J~
Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Wednesday, May 25, 2005 8:25 PM
check with falenfenix, i know shes into the corrolla things, but apparently the corrollas have been taking the newest celica engines and swappin em in....so she prob knows some decent celica sites...



Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Wednesday, May 25, 2005 8:45 PM
I say mod the hell out of the cav, 2.2s are coming out everywhere and I am very partial to the OHV motor




http://www.j-body.org/forums/read.php?f=40&i=73028&t=73028







Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Wednesday, May 25, 2005 10:36 PM
the only problem i've got right now is stuff keeps breaking on my cavalier, at first it was little stuff, fuses and bulbs, no biggie, now i've got full led interior lights, dash lights and hvac lights, all the fuses are fixed, all the wiring corrected and tucked away for my stereo and lights, neons hidden nicely, i got my windows tinted and the clutch pedal went to the floor, so i flushed it all out fresh fluid and a couple days driving around town and it came back up, then my a/c went out, now that the ac is out i'm alittle nervous to fix it, everything i fix something else seems to break. i seem to have this problem with every car i own, every upgrade or mod i make seems to have a negative effect on the car for some odd reason, oh well i'm makin pretty good money now so i guess i should just get the mod bug out of my system with my cavy for awhile. My goal with the car this year was to get it tinted, put the new system in and try to get air ride by winter, possibly next spring.

I'm curious to the guys with custom cavies, i realize a project car is a total loss investment, 50,000 in a car today is worth maybe 20,000 if you find the right person and they are desperate from what i've seen, but compared to the stock cavies how well do modded cavaliers and sunfires sell? blue book on my cars is only about 2500 bucks right now and thats almost not worth selling to me, when you figure the air ride kit will cost me 2 grand to install and wire properly thats almost insane.

J~
Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Wednesday, May 25, 2005 10:41 PM
Spending that much time (and time = $$$) on balancing the crank... ain't worth it. Couple of hp, tops. Better spent elsewhere.

Face it, the 2.2L motor is an econobox motor. Not meant for horsepower. Swap a 2.4L or 2.2L Eco in there, and get modding. You'll spend more money getting the 2.2L to make the power a DOHC motor does stock... than you would just swapping and building up.




<a href="http://www.lenkorules.com/"><img src="http://s93165229.onlinehome.us/images/zm/sig/LRDCsig3.jpg"></a>
Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Wednesday, May 25, 2005 10:56 PM
^^ Wow, this is one time I disagree with you Lenko

Take a look at the boost forum and se how many 2.2s are getting up there

Granted the 2.2 is built for economy, any engine that is built and put together correctly can out perform an engine of a "higher class"

It just all depends on the moeny you want to put into it







Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Wednesday, May 25, 2005 11:14 PM
Ok, fair enough.. but at what cost? I can get a 2.4L motor for under $1000... that's 150 hp/tq to start with.






<a href="http://www.lenkorules.com/"><img src="http://s93165229.onlinehome.us/images/zm/sig/LRDCsig3.jpg"></a>
Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Wednesday, May 25, 2005 11:41 PM
Well, for that $1000 and the time (and remember you said time=money) I could turbo a 2.2 and have way more than that

And I will show you with a car that I am turboing here in the next few weeks







Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Thursday, May 26, 2005 12:00 AM
have fun changing your water pump

is 40more hp worth the pain in the a$$ the twin cams are? I think not...

bolt on a turbo or spray and you're faster than most of the tools here anyway.

I see where you come from lenko, but the OHV is starting to be a more accepted and more frequent motor built up for performance reasons

and if you break it, you get a new one for $275 on ebay with a buy it now price.






Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Thursday, May 26, 2005 12:02 AM
oh and btw 10psi on the OHV, which I hear is kosher, yields around 200hp and 220+ tq

I will be running that on my OHV, then with built internals plan on taking it up to at least 15psi and shooting for about 250hp or so






Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Thursday, May 26, 2005 10:41 AM
as i recall hearing, the stock 2200s cant take much more than 170hp on the factory rods before they become a time bomb, which is why i planned rods and pistons as a must have upgrade, the crank and all that i could wait for, it would just allow the motor to rev much happier, if its balanced right and lightened alittle it can rev higher in theory, making the factory redline a very safe sane level, of course gm plays it extremely safe now so i doubt its that much of a need to thing.

even with building the turbo kit myself, upgradeing the pistons and rods and new valves and roller rockers since i'm in there thats still a chunk of cash, and since i run alot of miles up on my car i'm not so sure the trade off in long life/hp is worth the cash put into it, the motors already at 105,000 miles.

thats why i was looking at cars that already make around 200 hp and are proven reliable, not that i would call an eclipse reliable lol, but most of them are decent enough.

J~
Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Thursday, May 26, 2005 5:06 PM
TheFlyingSquirrel (PJ) wrote:have fun changing your water pump

is 40more hp worth the pain in the a$$ the twin cams are? I think not...


Where did that come from? Out of all the people I know in the area (over 300) with J-cars... most with 2.4L's... only one has ever had to do the water pump. About 5 with 2.2L's have had to do the head gasket.

Problems like the water pump are rare... don't blow it out of proportion.

I still stand by my 2.4L swap opinion.. There are so few fast 2.2L's compared to even the number of spraying 2.4L's... which are still faster. Geez, my old Z24 ran 13.8's on giggle juice and not much else. Show me some 2.2L's that can run 13.8's that cheap.

(Not ecotecs!)




<a href="http://www.lenkorules.com/"><img src="http://s93165229.onlinehome.us/images/zm/sig/LRDCsig3.jpg"></a>
Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Thursday, May 26, 2005 6:06 PM
John Lenko wrote:
TheFlyingSquirrel (PJ) wrote:have fun changing your water pump

is 40more hp worth the pain in the a$$ the twin cams are? I think not...


Where did that come from? Out of all the people I know in the area (over 300) with J-cars... most with 2.4L's... only one has ever had to do the water pump. About 5 with 2.2L's have had to do the head gasket.

Problems like the water pump are rare... don't blow it out of proportion.

I still stand by my 2.4L swap opinion.. There are so few fast 2.2L's compared to even the number of spraying 2.4L's... which are still faster. Geez, my old Z24 ran 13.8's on giggle juice and not much else. Show me some 2.2L's that can run 13.8's that cheap.

(Not ecotecs!)


def definately must disagree with ya john..... you my man, 50 grand and all, but somethings are being overlooked...


for starters, i have seen more #3 rod bearings spun, and water pumps going out than i have seen on headgaskets in the baltimore/dc area. about a 4 to 1 ratio at that....

i;ve personally changed 3 head gaskets, but have turned down over 10 people on doing water pump or rod bearing repairs cause i dont feel comfy with em.... but really the older 2.2;s were known for the head gasket problems.... by 98, the quality of the material was fixed. so 95-97 were the mainstay for that, but then again the 96-98 2.4's had their #3 bearing and water pump issues.

and i;ve def seen quite a few posts on that on this forum and the rksport forum back when it was still up.
water pumps where you are might be rare, but in this area, it was common. might be due to the avg temps... no idea. might just be what factory it came from.....



now on few fast 2.2;s...... i can legitamently say the same for 2.4's.... you guys run 15's and 16's stock... the avg is around low 15 seconds out of most here on this site.... not really that impressive for a 35 hp lead, and more of an abundance of parts readily available for some time now...

but you have people who break out of the mold, like karo for example....

N/a karo ran 13.1 seconds i believe.... built motor, lightened car.....

Byron clements did 13.6 N/A in a older 2.2 ohv sunfire.... http://members.aol.com/KWZ26/byronC.html

.5 seconds.... not really that much a difference, not to mention karo did later run faster with nitrous.


but how many people realistically are gonna reach 13;s N/A or take the time to learn how to use nitrous properly or do a turbo setup that will do 13;s or less?


take a look at any forum....

you have people asking repetitive or straight out rediculous questions about ebay electric superchargers....

but no one takes the time to read anything....
no one takes the time to learn.... and thats the main reason they arent fast.... in whatever racing you do.... more than just drag racin


now you ask, name a 2.2 thats doing 13.8's in the price range of your past z24 and nitrous setup?

no praaaaahblem, brah!

http://www.j-body.org/members/scrufdog/cars/1/

Scruf was doing 13;s before anyone else really even hit 13's if i remember correct, atleast none that were on rksport of jbo at the time....

and i am def sure the price of a z24 and nitrous vs what he paid for his entire setup was decently less than what you had paid.


but what does that prove? it proves that in all three engines available, the same goals can be accomplished.... it doesnt take a boat load of money. the 2.2 ohv isnt hard to mod.... after doing my rebuild... i found this out.... ITS EASY.

but you have to know what you want to do, roughly how much you wanna spend AND above all you have to be realistc about it. and know what you are shopping for....

so far i have seen people rave about 3 angle valve jobs like they are really amazing..... thats stock...... but the person who was raving about it, paid about 40$ more than i did my valve job which is multi-angle radiused. which offers more flow at that.

the reason you dont see as many 13 second 2.2's....

its not because the parts arent there......
its not because the the support isnt there, theres plenty of people who want your money
its MAINLY because with 2.2's being the majority of the 3 engines.....

theres younger people
theres less knowledge
theres less effort
and theres less patience to learn.

you tell someone to read an faq when they ask about an intake, the b--ch and complain.... but its the same person a day later asking why his check engine light is on..... but that could have been avoided if he would have read the FAQ and saw on page 2 where to put his IAT sensor and not throw it out in the trash.....


but check the boost forum.... plenty of boosted 2.2's.... not alot of money either....

above someone posted 275 for a 2.2 on ebay.......


i went to the junkyard and pulled my own, with my bare hands, lifted it with my body, brought it back here, and took it apart in my living room. cost me a total of 125$ http://www.angelfire.com/md/TOWSONFTBLPLYR/PROject2200.html


you can ALWAYS get something for less, when YOU do more of the work yourself. and you learn alot more than way as well.


also on fast 2.2;s vs 2.4;s spraying???

lest not forget justin cox with a 2.2 ohv, 3 speed auto with basic boltons and a full body kit and molded wing running 15.9's

but then we have posts like http://www.j-body.org/forums/read.php?f=2&i=205833&t=205833&arch=1#205833

2000$ in mods on a z24, and running 16's???

brads a cool kid, watched him over the years, and hes learned...that i can vouch for him in his defense..... now hes applying what hes learned and improving. but justin had prob less money in parts, and ran faster with a slower engine?

goes to show you, its not how much you spend, its what you spend it on and the knowlege of knowing what works....

sure big reciepts may impress some, but for others time slips matter.


on that note i;ll conclude, swapping an engine, for 35 hp.... for me... prob isnt worth it. i'm not trying to make a magazine for having the most horsepower. to have a decently fast car it can be done easily with any of the 3 gm engines for j bodies and it can be done for relative LITTLE money.

thats if you know what you are doing, and know how to shop around.


for the amount of people who will swap over an engine, and not do much with it, there will be MANY more who stick with what they have and surpassed the guy who swapped.

cause as it stands, you can swap to a DOHC..... but then you pay nearly double in some parts that i pay single for.... so then you will have those complaining about parts being so expensive... like cams, etc...

as it stands on fast cars, theres only a handful of 300+ hp cars...

200+ is easily reachable on any engine.... so is 300, but it takes some knowledge and patience.... the second is of which the majority in life in general lack






Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Thursday, May 26, 2005 6:31 PM
Wow I'm not gonna quote that... ha ha Art.. some very good points there.

The #3 bearing is more common than the water pump (in my area) by far. I know quite a few people who have spun #3.. one person did it twice!!

Comparing my 2000Z24 to Doomie is apples & oranges... cost wise that is. The initial cost on the car ignored, I'm way ahead. The nitrous was only $500 If you were to compare a 2000 with the LD9 to a 2000 with the 2200... put the same amount of money into both... it's a no-brainer which one wins. (and still runs at the end of the quarter mile).

There's a 2001 Z24 5-speed up the street from me for sale... $2000, but it's got a ticking lifter (what's why it's so cheap). Just over 100,000 miles. For another $500, I could put nitrous on it and put it down the track in the 13's time and time again... and it would STILL be faster than most of the cars on this site in a straight line.

But you're bang on Art...

Quote:

thats if you know what you are doing, and know how to shop around.



If I had a 2.2L, I might feel differently...

but the number of times I've considered swapping my piddly 2.4L engine out for an L67... man... even the numerous possibilities for the 2.4L leave me wanting more than it could ever provide. If only it weren't a daily driver...






<a href="http://www.lenkorules.com/"><img src="http://s93165229.onlinehome.us/images/zm/sig/LRDCsig3.jpg"></a>
Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Thursday, May 26, 2005 6:41 PM
becides that, pretty much all the quads ( i do love them) it seems like the car was built around the engine.

i bet i can change the headgasket on my 2.2 OHV faster than you can change the water pump on the 2.4DOHC.

Just face it, if you want to play you have to pay, you can get a spare 2.2 ohv for next to nothing and spend, say $1,000 upgrading it, or spend a good bit more buying a DOHC from the start. but in terms of reliability i have to stick with the 2.2, change the oil, give it a headgasket and timing chain every 100,000 miles and it will never die.



CAR GODS MADE THE 1.6 SOHC TO MAKE US 2.2 OHV GUYS FEEL BETTER.
Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Thursday, May 26, 2005 6:49 PM
John Lenko wrote:Wow I'm not gonna quote that... ha ha Art.. some very good points there.

The #3 bearing is more common than the water pump (in my area) by far. I know quite a few people who have spun #3.. one person did it twice!!

Comparing my 2000Z24 to Doomie is apples & oranges... cost wise that is. The initial cost on the car ignored, I'm way ahead. The nitrous was only $500 If you were to compare a 2000 with the LD9 to a 2000 with the 2200... put the same amount of money into both... it's a no-brainer which one wins. (and still runs at the end of the quarter mile).

There's a 2001 Z24 5-speed up the street from me for sale... $2000, but it's got a ticking lifter (what's why it's so cheap). Just over 100,000 miles. For another $500, I could put nitrous on it and put it down the track in the 13's time and time again... and it would STILL be faster than most of the cars on this site in a straight line.

But you're bang on Art...

Quote:

thats if you know what you are doing, and know how to shop around.



If I had a 2.2L, I might feel differently...

but the number of times I've considered swapping my piddly 2.4L engine out for an L67... man... even the numerous possibilities for the 2.4L leave me wanting more than it could ever provide. If only it weren't a daily driver...


i hear ya man....

but one thing....

lets take the 2000 2.4

personally without checking inside, you dont know how many times that 2.4 with a ticking lifter or more damage will go down the track with nitrous....

and then you figure, 2000$ for a 2001.... you can find a 99-01 2200 ohv for 300$ in essex/middle river, md....

so 1700$ into engine work, and if you play your cars smartly, for the price you would pay for that z24 for 2000$ you could have a 2.2 ohv that surpasses it, rebuilt engine

(joe almeida is selling some crower pistons and rods 12:1 CR pistons in classified for 250 - shave em down to lower comp ratio a bit and clean em)

after pistons that leaves you with 1450$ for block work... or you can get pistons done for 300 and rods for 300, leaving you with 1100$ for engine work


and then when all is said and rebuilt you can add that 500$ in nitrous, and you;ve got a new engine, 13;s easily, and reliability.....



for me i do have the 2.2, so i can see how some think i may be biased, but then again i also have a 2.5L V6 4wd in the form of a calibra i bought back home 9 years ago... and still under 50k.... so i have projects... but i just honestly believe one can def accomplish normal goals with what they have, without going through extra effort and ultimately a higher price

i can kinda parrallel it to plastic surgery and a gym..... i dont need calf implants or bicep implants of thigh implants or etc..... i can do all of those on my own at the gym.... i have to put in a bit of work, but ultimately its less a price, i learn during the process, and way less stress and downtime than with the other....


but i know what you mean on the larger engine and wanting like the L67.... once again i can parrallel that to the gym.... i have alot of friends who want my size, and strength....and their EASY option........take roids to do it.... but then again, when you reach that 1st goal.....whats the next step? it can turn out to be a vicious cycle.




Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Thursday, May 26, 2005 6:52 PM
Quote:

does anybody know a good forum for the celicas? i've been searching for days and cant find anything really useful, mostly boards catering to old school 80s and early 90s models.
Try newcelica.org



Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Thursday, May 26, 2005 9:21 PM
sounds like a lot of good information, i'm not much of a strip kinda guy, sure straight is fun, but i like curves myself, my idea was to build a motor that is capable of putting out around 200-250, has a very wide powerband, or a very useable powerband, i dont want to be mid corner in 2nd gear only to find my car has lost the curve and i have to scramble to find some revs, thats one of the negatives about the celica, the engine has a very narrow range that it works in, the acuras are similar but better from what i've heard, i was also thinking about a vw gti the power is nice and broad. then again if i can get my car straightened out it might be worth while to just fix mine.

if i figure the cost of a newer car to be around 15,000 equipped how i want, the resale on my car only is 2500 in mint condition, i'd need to save a nice chunk for a down payment, at least 5 grand, and i'd prefer more so my payments are lower but if you figure the 10 grand i'll try to put down with the cash from my current cavy, i could do alot of work in smart areas..... very in depth choices to make...guess i'll have to think about it for awhile and see which works out cheaper inthe long run, while still giving me the most fun for the buck.

one thing i'm curious about, does anybody know of a company that makes new chips for the j-bodies? i know a few other cars have aftermarket ecu chips as upgrades but i havent heard much about it from the j-body site.

J~
Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Thursday, May 26, 2005 11:45 PM
J~ wrote:one thing i'm curious about, does anybody know of a company that makes new chips for the j-bodies? i know a few other cars have aftermarket ecu chips as upgrades but i havent heard much about it from the j-body site.


OBD2 J-cars aren't chippable... so 96+ you have to reflash the ECU. The "chip" is soldered to the board and isn't removeable... (I'm almost certain the board the chip is on is sealed inside the ecu unit anyway...)

www.jbodyperformance.com for the reflash.




<a href="http://www.lenkorules.com/"><img src="http://s93165229.onlinehome.us/images/zm/sig/LRDCsig3.jpg"></a>
Re: what do you guys think of this idea?
Friday, May 27, 2005 7:46 PM
me advise is to go with the gsx. they can put out over 250 hp with out much modification at all and not only that, they are fun as hell to drive and they get around great. i drove one and got through the snow at normal speed and didnt slip once and i could go around corners on dry pavment ot like 45 or 50 with the tires skidding accross the ground at all.
Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search