oh sure, blow of MI for that. you suck
j/k man hope all the tuning went well, maybe you can make it to MI next year
02 Cavalier sedan ECOTEC special plans ahead
04 Malibu classic ECOTEC now the daily driver
ECOTEC Cavalier 13's coming summer 2008
thats it! im breaking your @!#$ hands!
McLovin wrote:thats it! im breaking your @!#$ hands!
But there's not that many pics of my car...I have more if you really want to see them.
---------------------------------------------------
4 Cams...32 Valves...5 Liters...This Could Get Fun!
I'm also contemplating getting rid of the body kit. Not gonna ship it so don't ask. Anyone w/ a blue ls sport, or any ls sport for that matter willing to trade plus $$$ pm me.
---------------------------------------------------
4 Cams...32 Valves...5 Liters...This Could Get Fun!
Lots of nice cars! the Elise is pretty slick too!
Qwik2k2z24 wrote:track times??
14.0 @ 104
14.1 @ 105
and the real laugher 14.9 @ 108
All runs w/ afr of 10.5 and 10psi.
---------------------------------------------------
4 Cams...32 Valves...5 Liters...This Could Get Fun!
Skunk v.2K4 wrote:Qwik2k2z24 wrote:track times??
14.0 @ 104
14.1 @ 105
and the real laugher 14.9 @ 108
All runs w/ afr of 10.5 and 10psi.
damn dude.. we would have had some serious fun if you came to MI and ran with us... those were roughly my times on same boost level..
BeardLife /
Club Awesome Reject Blog
nice times....on another note
I wish RKSport didnt discontinue this spoiler, cause I like this and hate the brickyard.
Those are not nice times, my car w/ those trap speeds should run in the mid to hi 12's at least low 13's. My afr's were in the mid 10's.
---------------------------------------------------
4 Cams...32 Valves...5 Liters...This Could Get Fun!
Skunk v.2K4 wrote:Those are not nice times, my car w/ those trap speeds should run in the mid to hi 12's at least low 13's. My afr's were in the mid 10's.
Then tune your AFRs and learn to drive better.. or don't complain.
BeardLife /
Club Awesome Reject Blog
hatch wrote:nice times....on another note
I wish RKSport didnt discontinue this spoiler, cause I like this and hate the brickyard.
I thought that IS the Brickyard?!
--- --- ---
Why the F&CK did I buy a POS new 07 Hyundai Elantra?!
I shoulda kept the 02 Ranger 4x4 - comfort is better than MPG's
Qwik2k2z24 wrote:Skunk v.2K4 wrote:Those are not nice times, my car w/ those trap speeds should run in the mid to hi 12's at least low 13's. My afr's were in the mid 10's.
Then tune your AFRs and learn to drive better.. or don't complain.
Well considering my 60's were 2.2, 2.3 ish, i blame most of it on afr's, which have been corrected, they are now in the mid to upper 11's. And it's my thread, if I wanna bitch about my times I can. So
---------------------------------------------------
4 Cams...32 Valves...5 Liters...This Could Get Fun!
Skunk v.2K4 wrote:Those are not nice times, my car w/ those trap speeds should run in the mid to hi 12's at least low 13's. My afr's were in the mid 10's.
"mid 12s". Another dreamer.
Evolution of Cavyboy-->C22t--> C24na--->c24s/c
1995 Cavalier W/2k1 Engine
GM S/C 13.940@99.78pmh w/2.068 60ft
i was only able to pull off a 15.13 @ 90.79 =/
12.33 @ 111.67 mph [Oct 2009]
Dyno'd on 08/02/09 - Mustang Dyno:
327.6 WHP 333.6 WTQ [10.1 AFR]
Proof
Click here if you dare to find out the truth...input vehicle weight at 2900, trap speed of 108 and get hp of 285.11, then follow up with inputting those numbers in the second field...and you get the magic 12.62083. Wow amazing how facts and numbers work huh. I know that is saying w/ a perfect launch and perfect track conditions, so hi 12's low 13's should certainly have been possible, but i guess that's what you get when you're taking it a lil easy on your car.
And for further proof there are others that would be willing to input their numbers and amazingly they are accurate, I believe Tom (Wrench Monkey) would be one of those individuals.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edited Monday, October 22, 2007 9:38 PM
---------------------------------------------------
4 Cams...32 Valves...5 Liters...This Could Get Fun!
I can't believe I'm not even 10 minutes away from you every weekend, and I still haven't seen the car
Ya gotta PM me the directions again, god knows where they are now. I moved to Huntley about 6 weeks ago, so everything is still in total dis-array. Hows that cheekbone healin?
--- --- ---
Why the F&CK did I buy a POS new 07 Hyundai Elantra?!
I shoulda kept the 02 Ranger 4x4 - comfort is better than MPG's
so no one posted a video of me poppin my axle yet? damit I wanna see it thanks for the pics curt
Team GREEN
07 Cobalt SS/SC
Tom's got it, just make ask him to bring the cam to work.
---------------------------------------------------
4 Cams...32 Valves...5 Liters...This Could Get Fun!
Skunk, that website sucks. You can just go by a mathematical equation, get some slicks, drive a bit better, then you should be happy and in the 13's. I would think a 12.5 would be what you have with some built internals at least.
hatch wrote:nice times....on another note
I wish RKSport didnt discontinue this spoiler, cause I like this and hate the brickyard.
funny cuz that IS the brickyard...
5 YEAR ANNIVERSARY FREEBIE GIVEAWAY - CLICK HERE TO ENTER
What you know about Street Racing anyways? Only what Fast & Furious taught us....
SO EVERYTHING!
That's funny built internals add no increase of hp, if you do stock replacement but forged, everything is still the same, hmmm imagine that, when you go from 10:1 compression to 10:1 compression you don't gain any hp, wow, i think i just made a big discovery. FYI, I wasn't launching hard at the track...ON PURPOSE. And you're absouletly right math has no place when trying to formualte things for the car.
Those are the times you would get w/ a perfect launch and all that. So let's consider something, I have seen w/ my own eyes a completely stock eco run a 12.7, only difference between his car and mine...Drag Radials. 1.7 sec 60's, his best run on a street tire was in the mid 13's somewhere I don't recall exactly. So seeing as I was still pulling low 2 sec 60's and not pushing it hard till 3rd, I'd say yeah the runs were good, but the car can do more and shouldn't be judged by the times. You don't think that formula is acurate, wow, you really are dense. So everyone listen he has all the answers to my problems, to solve my issue I need slicks and forged internals and I'll run mid 12's
. The car can do it now, just need radials, but we'll never know bc I don't have them and won't have them until next year, and next year it'll be far from a stock eco, I was more interested in my trap speeds than anything else on that day, so getting a 14.9 @ 108 really didn't hurt my feelings too bad. Especially considering how rich I was running. Guess this weekends dyno will reveal a lil bit more huh.
End Rant.
---------------------------------------------------
4 Cams...32 Valves...5 Liters...This Could Get Fun!
DaFlyinSkwirl (PJ) - BPU++ wrote:I miss WI =(
Well then drive the 15hrs or whatever it is for you, in NJ aren't you? And come see us, I missed your car the last time you were up there, wanted to see the 14.0 all motor eco. Extremely impressive my friend.
---------------------------------------------------
4 Cams...32 Valves...5 Liters...This Could Get Fun!
